Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Colorado Col. | 1,528.3385 | 1,544.6791 | 1,536.4871 | 60.56 | 70.38 | 0.298 |
2nd | Southwestern (TX) | 1,487.5047 | 1,524.9428 | 1,506.1074 | 59.30 | 70.02 | 0.274 |
3rd | Trinity (TX) | 1,410.2629 | 1,449.1287 | 1,429.5637 | 55.69 | 63.57 | 0.176 |
4th | Texas Lutheran | 1,390.6983 | 1,410.2781 | 1,400.4540 | 54.85 | 61.27 | 0.157 |
5th | Austin | 1,338.9372 | 1,377.1396 | 1,357.9041 | 51.90 | 59.29 | 0.131 |
6th | Dallas | 1,274.2201 | 1,293.9735 | 1,284.0588 | 49.04 | 56.11 | 0.036 |
7th | Schreiner | 1,206.5120 | 1,263.2794 | 1,234.5695 | 45.67 | 53.88 | 0.024 |
8th | Centenary (LA) | 1,122.7509 | 1,172.0848 | 1,147.1527 | 40.98 | 49.68 | -0.097 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Southwestern (TX) | 0.3207 | 41.17 | 9.10 | 38.11 | 48.75 | 2.36 | 8.56 |
2nd | Colorado Col. | 0.3140 | 43.44 | 12.04 | 40.35 | 44.37 | 3.45 | 10.61 |
3rd | Trinity (TX) | 0.2648 | 39.08 | 12.60 | 36.67 | 48.92 | 3.55 | 9.96 |
4th | Austin | 0.2372 | 36.96 | 13.24 | 33.97 | 52.12 | 3.26 | 7.17 |
5th | Texas Lutheran | 0.2346 | 36.89 | 13.43 | 34.24 | 52.30 | 3.00 | 8.36 |
6th | Schreiner | 0.1601 | 31.46 | 15.44 | 28.99 | 57.50 | 3.13 | 6.88 |
7th | Dallas | 0.1522 | 30.62 | 15.40 | 28.54 | 56.24 | 3.91 | 8.87 |
8th | Centenary (LA) | 0.1091 | 29.10 | 18.19 | 27.10 | 58.35 | 5.20 | 8.85 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Colorado Col. | 0.0156 | 21.77 | 20.21 | 20.13 | 63.50 | 6.99 | 4.62 |
2nd | Southwestern (TX) | 0.0469 | 22.15 | 17.46 | 21.03 | 64.16 | 4.59 | 3.66 |
3rd | Texas Lutheran | 0.0779 | 24.69 | 16.91 | 23.04 | 60.47 | 5.15 | 4.89 |
4th | Trinity (TX) | 0.0890 | 25.79 | 16.89 | 23.97 | 60.48 | 5.47 | 5.36 |
5th | Austin | 0.1060 | 28.54 | 17.95 | 26.58 | 54.66 | 6.48 | 5.96 |
6th | Dallas | 0.1162 | 26.85 | 15.23 | 25.31 | 62.42 | 3.59 | 5.07 |
7th | Schreiner | 0.1363 | 29.96 | 16.33 | 27.01 | 56.79 | 4.49 | 7.21 |
8th | Centenary (LA) | 0.2058 | 36.54 | 15.96 | 33.58 | 49.60 | 3.92 | 8.46 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,362.0372 | 1,368.7763 | 1,367.9952 | 1,379.1790 | 1,369.4969 |
Difference | 6.7391 | 5.9580 | 17.1419 | 9.9463 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Colorado Col. | 119 | 2,522 | 1,313 | 212 | 207 | 52.06 | 11.9 | 12.2 | 1,999 | 761 | 125 | 153 | 61.93 | 16.0 | 13.1 |
Southwestern (TX) | 118 | 2,676 | 1,380 | 151 | 150 | 51.57 | 17.7 | 17.8 | 2,176 | 843 | 100 | 128 | 61.26 | 21.8 | 17.0 |
Texas Lutheran | 90 | 2,014 | 1,031 | 149 | 103 | 51.19 | 13.5 | 19.6 | 1,793 | 801 | 98 | 112 | 55.33 | 18.3 | 16.0 |
Trinity (TX) | 124 | 2,692 | 1,316 | 199 | 183 | 48.89 | 13.5 | 14.7 | 2,482 | 1,095 | 150 | 185 | 55.88 | 16.5 | 13.4 |
Austin | 128 | 2,740 | 1,334 | 165 | 151 | 48.69 | 16.6 | 18.1 | 2,625 | 1,220 | 179 | 164 | 53.52 | 14.7 | 16.0 |
Dallas | 100 | 1,984 | 858 | 129 | 103 | 43.25 | 15.4 | 19.3 | 2,260 | 1,154 | 124 | 140 | 48.94 | 18.2 | 16.1 |
Schreiner | 93 | 1,754 | 720 | 92 | 129 | 41.05 | 19.1 | 13.6 | 2,097 | 1,088 | 173 | 148 | 48.12 | 12.1 | 14.2 |
Centenary (LA) | 97 | 1,566 | 623 | 156 | 163 | 39.78 | 10.0 | 9.6 | 2,075 | 1,152 | 200 | 174 | 44.48 | 10.4 | 11.9 |
Conference Average | 109 | 2,244 | 1,072 | 157 | 149 | 47.06 | 14.7 | 15.6 | 2,188 | 1,014 | 144 | 151 | 53.68 | 16.0 | 14.7 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
75.15 |
2015-11-06 | Georgetown, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
71.70 |
2015-10-24 | Colorado Springs, CO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
70.92 |
2015-10-23 | Colorado Springs, CO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
70.23 |
2015-11-07 | Georgetown, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
69.64 |
2015-10-23 | Colorado Springs, CO |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
69.47 |
2015-10-10 | Kerrville, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
68.31 |
2015-09-27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
67.97 |
2015-11-06 | Georgetown, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
67.37 |
2015-09-27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
66.48 |
2015-10-24 | Colorado Springs, CO |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Kaitlyn Foster | Southwestern (TX) |
2 | Kristin Fording | Texas Lutheran |
3 | Courtney Birkett | Colorado Col. |
4 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) |
5 | Erika Edrington | Trinity (TX) |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Kristin Fording | Texas Lutheran |
2 | Courtney Birkett | Colorado Col. |
3 | Reagan Folaron | Colorado Col. |
4 | Rebekah Bowden | Austin |
5 | Delanie Cauthen | Schreiner |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Erika Edrington | Trinity (TX) |
2 | Nikki Welch | Southwestern (TX) |
3 | Sarah Barker | Colorado Col. |
4 | Rebecca Watson | Colorado Col. |
5 | Elizabeth Smith | Dallas |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Megan Dugie | Texas Lutheran |
2 | Jessie Koster | Dallas |
3 | Rachel Fusselman | Austin |
4 | Sophie Merrifield | Colorado Col. |
5 | Macey Pool | Southwestern (TX) |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kaitlyn Foster | Southwestern (TX) | 26.7930 |
2 | Erika Edrington | Trinity (TX) | 23.9459 |
3 | Courtney Birkett | Colorado Col. | 23.7939 |
4 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) | 23.5894 |
5 | Rachel Fusselman | Austin | 20.8800 |
6 | Jessie Koster | Dallas | 20.1988 |
7 | Kristin Fording | Texas Lutheran | 20.1914 |
8 | Abbe Holtze | Colorado Col. | 19.5122 |
9 | Katie Ingle | Austin | 17.7317 |
10 | Megan Dugie | Texas Lutheran | 16.8764 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Courtney Birkett | Colorado Col. | 15.0589 |
2 | Erika Edrington | Trinity (TX) | 13.4350 |
3 | Kaitlyn Foster | Southwestern (TX) | 12.5634 |
4 | Kristin Fording | Texas Lutheran | 10.7594 |
5 | Katie Ingle | Austin | 10.3517 |
6 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) | 9.8555 |
7 | Abbe Holtze | Colorado Col. | 9.5811 |
8 | Rebekah Bowden | Austin | 9.0133 |
9 | Nikki Welch | Southwestern (TX) | 8.9400 |
10 | Abbie Robb | Southwestern (TX) | 7.7919 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jessie Koster | Dallas | 19.5177 |
2 | Rachel Fusselman | Austin | 18.7455 |
3 | Sophie Merrifield | Colorado Col. | 15.6223 |
4 | Megan Dugie | Texas Lutheran | 15.5949 |
5 | Andie Alford | Southwestern (TX) | 15.0758 |
6 | Shannon Courtney | Trinity (TX) | 14.5080 |
7 | Kaitlyn Foster | Southwestern (TX) | 14.2296 |
8 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) | 13.7339 |
9 | Nicole West | Schreiner | 11.4745 |
10 | Diana Hassink | Dallas | 10.6872 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kaitlyn Foster | Southwestern (TX) | 0.2653 |
2 | Kristin Fording | Texas Lutheran | 0.2294 |
3 | Courtney Birkett | Colorado Col. | 0.2266 |
4 | Jessie Koster | Dallas | 0.2020 |
5 | Erika Edrington | Trinity (TX) | 0.2012 |
6 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) | 0.1999 |
7 | Abbe Holtze | Colorado Col. | 0.1951 |
8 | Megan Dugie | Texas Lutheran | 0.1875 |
9 | Nikki Welch | Southwestern (TX) | 0.1685 |
10 | Rachel Fusselman | Austin | 0.1670 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Courtney Birkett | Colorado Col. | 0.1434 |
2 | Kaitlyn Foster | Southwestern (TX) | 0.1244 |
3 | Kristin Fording | Texas Lutheran | 0.1223 |
4 | Erika Edrington | Trinity (TX) | 0.1129 |
5 | Abbe Holtze | Colorado Col. | 0.0958 |
6 | Nikki Welch | Southwestern (TX) | 0.0894 |
7 | Delanie Cauthen | Schreiner | 0.0844 |
8 | Alyssa Chapman | Schreiner | 0.0836 |
9 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) | 0.0835 |
10 | Katie Ingle | Austin | 0.0815 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jessie Koster | Dallas | 0.1952 |
2 | Megan Dugie | Texas Lutheran | 0.1733 |
3 | Rachel Fusselman | Austin | 0.1500 |
4 | Sophie Merrifield | Colorado Col. | 0.1474 |
5 | Kaitlyn Foster | Southwestern (TX) | 0.1409 |
6 | Nicole West | Schreiner | 0.1399 |
7 | Andie Alford | Southwestern (TX) | 0.1334 |
8 | Shannon Courtney | Trinity (TX) | 0.1262 |
9 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) | 0.1164 |
10 | Diana Hassink | Dallas | 0.1080 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.