Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Colorado Col. 1,528.3385 1,544.6791 1,536.4871 60.56 70.38 0.298
2nd Southwestern (TX) 1,487.5047 1,524.9428 1,506.1074 59.30 70.02 0.274
3rd Trinity (TX) 1,410.2629 1,449.1287 1,429.5637 55.69 63.57 0.176
4th Texas Lutheran 1,390.6983 1,410.2781 1,400.4540 54.85 61.27 0.157
5th Austin 1,338.9372 1,377.1396 1,357.9041 51.90 59.29 0.131
6th Dallas 1,274.2201 1,293.9735 1,284.0588 49.04 56.11 0.036
7th Schreiner 1,206.5120 1,263.2794 1,234.5695 45.67 53.88 0.024
8th Centenary (LA) 1,122.7509 1,172.0848 1,147.1527 40.98 49.68 -0.097

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Southwestern (TX) 0.3207 41.17 9.10 38.11 48.75 2.36 8.56
2nd Colorado Col. 0.3140 43.44 12.04 40.35 44.37 3.45 10.61
3rd Trinity (TX) 0.2648 39.08 12.60 36.67 48.92 3.55 9.96
4th Austin 0.2372 36.96 13.24 33.97 52.12 3.26 7.17
5th Texas Lutheran 0.2346 36.89 13.43 34.24 52.30 3.00 8.36
6th Schreiner 0.1601 31.46 15.44 28.99 57.50 3.13 6.88
7th Dallas 0.1522 30.62 15.40 28.54 56.24 3.91 8.87
8th Centenary (LA) 0.1091 29.10 18.19 27.10 58.35 5.20 8.85

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Colorado Col. 0.0156 21.77 20.21 20.13 63.50 6.99 4.62
2nd Southwestern (TX) 0.0469 22.15 17.46 21.03 64.16 4.59 3.66
3rd Texas Lutheran 0.0779 24.69 16.91 23.04 60.47 5.15 4.89
4th Trinity (TX) 0.0890 25.79 16.89 23.97 60.48 5.47 5.36
5th Austin 0.1060 28.54 17.95 26.58 54.66 6.48 5.96
6th Dallas 0.1162 26.85 15.23 25.31 62.42 3.59 5.07
7th Schreiner 0.1363 29.96 16.33 27.01 56.79 4.49 7.21
8th Centenary (LA) 0.2058 36.54 15.96 33.58 49.60 3.92 8.46

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,362.0372 1,368.7763 1,367.9952 1,379.1790 1,369.4969
Difference 6.7391 5.9580 17.1419 9.9463

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Colorado Col. 119 2,522 1,313 212 207 52.06 11.9 12.2 1,999 761 125 153 61.93 16.0 13.1
Southwestern (TX) 118 2,676 1,380 151 150 51.57 17.7 17.8 2,176 843 100 128 61.26 21.8 17.0
Texas Lutheran 90 2,014 1,031 149 103 51.19 13.5 19.6 1,793 801 98 112 55.33 18.3 16.0
Trinity (TX) 124 2,692 1,316 199 183 48.89 13.5 14.7 2,482 1,095 150 185 55.88 16.5 13.4
Austin 128 2,740 1,334 165 151 48.69 16.6 18.1 2,625 1,220 179 164 53.52 14.7 16.0
Dallas 100 1,984 858 129 103 43.25 15.4 19.3 2,260 1,154 124 140 48.94 18.2 16.1
Schreiner 93 1,754 720 92 129 41.05 19.1 13.6 2,097 1,088 173 148 48.12 12.1 14.2
Centenary (LA) 97 1,566 623 156 163 39.78 10.0 9.6 2,075 1,152 200 174 44.48 10.4 11.9
Conference Average 109 2,244 1,072 157 149 47.06 14.7 15.6 2,188 1,014 144 151 53.68 16.0 14.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.15

2015-11-06 Georgetown, Texas
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
2
3
20
25
20
25
25
23
30
28
12
15
GAME

71.70

2015-10-24 Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
3
1
25
17
25
23
24
26
25
23
GAME

70.92

2015-10-23 Colorado Springs, CO
Austin
Texas Lutheran
3
2
22
25
21
25
25
19
25
22
15
10
GAME

70.23

2015-11-07 Georgetown, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
3
1
25
17
23
25
25
20
25
16
GAME

69.64

2015-10-23 Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
3
0
25
13
25
21
28
26
GAME

69.47

2015-10-10 Kerrville, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Texas Lutheran
3
1
25
23
22
25
25
17
25
17
GAME

68.31

2015-09-27
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
3
1
25
17
25
19
21
25
25
21
GAME

67.97

2015-11-06 Georgetown, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Texas Lutheran
3
0
25
21
25
22
25
11
GAME

67.37

2015-09-27
Trinity (TX)
Dallas
2
3
22
25
24
26
25
16
25
19
14
16
GAME

66.48

2015-10-24 Colorado Springs, CO
Southwestern (TX)
Austin
3
0
25
14
25
23
25
15

HuskerGeek SCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.7930
2 23.9459
3 23.7939
4 23.5894
5 20.8800
6 20.1988
7 20.1914
8 19.5122
9 17.7317
10 16.8764

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.0589
2 13.4350
3 12.5634
4 10.7594
5 10.3517
6 9.8555
7 9.5811
8 9.0133
9 8.9400
10 7.7919

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.5177
2 18.7455
3 15.6223
4 15.5949
5 15.0758
6 14.5080
7 14.2296
8 13.7339
9 11.4745
10 10.6872

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2653
2 0.2294
3 0.2266
4 0.2020
5 0.2012
6 0.1999
7 0.1951
8 0.1875
9 0.1685
10 0.1670

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1434
2 0.1244
3 0.1223
4 0.1129
5 0.0958
6 0.0894
7 0.0844
8 0.0836
9 0.0835
10 0.0815

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1952
2 0.1733
3 0.1500
4 0.1474
5 0.1409
6 0.1399
7 0.1334
8 0.1262
9 0.1164
10 0.1080


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek