Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Trinity (TX) 1,580.7913 1,578.6416 1,579.7160 56.92 53.94 0.159
2nd Colorado Col. 1,566.5275 1,564.0521 1,565.2893 57.84 57.55 0.192
3rd Southwestern (TX) 1,392.8746 1,390.4437 1,391.6586 47.05 48.84 -0.003
4th Austin 1,361.5665 1,358.9950 1,360.2802 49.04 56.00 -0.030
5th Texas Lutheran 1,331.4663 1,328.9130 1,330.1890 51.84 42.86 -0.058
6th Schreiner 1,328.5928 1,327.0098 1,327.8011 50.20 46.29 -0.062
7th Centenary (LA) 1,311.0787 1,309.6403 1,310.3593 38.02 48.05 -0.086
8th Dallas 1,285.3057 1,283.1845 1,284.2447 46.67 47.49 -0.092

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Colorado Col. 0.3588 41.11 5.23 39.00 42.62 4.69 6.49
2nd Trinity (TX) 0.3548 41.64 6.16 37.26 43.93 4.64 9.59
3rd Southwestern (TX) 0.2654 32.50 5.96 28.51 51.25 5.45 8.83
4th Austin 0.2273 31.66 8.92 28.84 55.78 4.71 6.13
5th Schreiner 0.2073 27.64 6.91 24.95 55.28 2.77 4.52
6th Centenary (LA) 0.2057 30.26 9.69 28.71 55.51 8.44 7.82
7th Dallas 0.2050 29.29 8.79 27.49 57.50 5.03 5.40
8th Texas Lutheran 0.1940 28.27 8.87 26.10 58.13 5.39 7.22

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Colorado Col. 0.1670 26.70 10.00 25.07 57.91 5.89 5.20
2nd Trinity (TX) 0.1962 29.86 10.24 26.83 53.52 6.29 4.03
3rd Texas Lutheran 0.2516 32.70 7.54 30.92 53.21 5.03 8.67
4th Austin 0.2570 35.36 9.66 31.70 49.92 6.87 9.23
5th Southwestern (TX) 0.2688 32.16 5.28 29.02 52.14 4.47 5.24
6th Schreiner 0.2690 32.95 6.05 29.88 49.27 3.47 6.91
7th Centenary (LA) 0.2920 35.16 5.95 33.58 53.26 4.91 6.48
8th Dallas 0.2971 35.65 5.95 32.12 52.55 4.05 8.08

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,393.6923 1,380.9296 1,352.4822 1,345.2346 1,368.0847
Difference -12.7627 -41.2101 -48.4577 -34.1435

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Austin 48 1,272 941 63 88 73.98 20.2 14.5 750 347 69 99 53.73 10.9 7.6
Colorado Col. 56 1,180 735 86 151 62.29 13.7 7.8 923 470 53 86 49.08 17.4 10.7
Dallas 43 1,023 664 50 83 64.91 20.5 12.3 858 477 65 88 44.41 13.2 9.8
Schreiner 59 1,379 867 55 82 62.87 25.1 16.8 1,192 657 84 110 44.88 14.2 10.8
Trinity (TX) 47 972 560 98 80 57.61 9.9 12.2 970 599 29 77 38.25 33.4 12.6
Texas Lutheran 57 1,131 585 73 110 51.72 15.5 10.3 1,270 713 110 113 43.86 11.5 11.2
Southwestern (TX) 43 628 324 66 91 51.59 9.5 6.9 981 721 55 76 26.50 17.8 12.9
Centenary (LA) 45 646 403 44 48 62.38 14.7 13.5 1,287 1,095 70 84 14.92 18.4 15.3
Conference Average 50 1,029 635 67 92 60.92 16.1 11.8 1,029 635 67 92 39.45 17.1 11.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

80.64

2021-03-27 Shreveport, La.
Centenary (LA)
Dallas
3
2
25
22
24
26
25
23
11
25
15
10
GAME

79.11

2021-03-20 Shreveport, La.
Centenary (LA)
Schreiner
3
2
28
26
21
25
19
25
25
20
15
11
GAME

76.37

2021-03-20 Shreveport, La.
Centenary (LA)
Schreiner
1
3
23
25
25
27
25
17
19
25
GAME

72.91

2021-05-01
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
3
1
22
25
25
21
30
28
25
19
GAME

69.57

2021-03-06
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
3
2
25
23
18
25
23
25
25
22
15
9
GAME

69.05

2021-03-05
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
3
0
25
19
25
22
25
21
GAME

67.73

2021-03-05
Schreiner
Southwestern (TX)
3
2
25
23
22
25
25
22
19
25
15
13
GAME

66.01

2021-03-27 Shreveport, La.
Centenary (LA)
Dallas
1
3
18
25
27
25
22
25
22
25
GAME

65.03

2021-03-05
Schreiner
Southwestern (TX)
1
3
28
30
26
24
20
25
19
25
GAME

64.38

2021-03-27
Colorado Col.
Austin
3
0
25
18
25
23
25
15

HuskerGeek SCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 14.2733
2 11.5028
3 9.5248
4 9.4994
5 8.3541
6 8.2713
7 8.1428
8 7.7224
9 7.5918
10 7.2030

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 8.0586
2 6.0470
3 4.6144
4 4.5697
5 4.4684
6 4.0162
7 3.8925
8 3.2615
9 3.1250
10 3.0074

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 10.8107
2 10.0612
3 9.3378
4 7.8364
5 6.7031
6 6.2147
7 5.7981
8 5.3903
9 5.3294
10 5.3044

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2500
2 0.2419
3 0.2323
4 0.1994
5 0.1950
6 0.1847
7 0.1843
8 0.1839
9 0.1671
10 0.1650

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1440
2 0.1366
3 0.1241
4 0.1172
5 0.0923
6 0.0845
7 0.0779
8 0.0766
9 0.0739
10 0.0721

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2648
2 0.2278
3 0.1832
4 0.1567
5 0.1559
6 0.1480
7 0.1447
8 0.1375
9 0.1254
10 0.1139


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek