Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Cal Lutheran | 1,578.0820 | 1,583.7618 | 1,580.9193 | 61.43 | 71.50 | 0.297 |
2nd | Claremont-M-S | 1,548.6680 | 1,567.4953 | 1,558.0532 | 61.87 | 71.20 | 0.284 |
3rd | La Verne | 1,495.1462 | 1,523.0809 | 1,509.0489 | 57.72 | 70.33 | 0.242 |
4th | Pomona-Pitzer | 1,390.7807 | 1,419.9256 | 1,405.2776 | 54.28 | 60.92 | 0.125 |
5th | Occidental | 1,362.8605 | 1,401.1082 | 1,381.8520 | 52.13 | 61.60 | 0.126 |
6th | Chapman | 1,355.7505 | 1,403.4610 | 1,379.3995 | 54.00 | 59.79 | 0.102 |
7th | Whittier | 1,342.8608 | 1,375.8584 | 1,359.2595 | 52.12 | 57.89 | 0.100 |
8th | Redlands | 1,318.0347 | 1,341.3847 | 1,329.6584 | 51.29 | 58.38 | 0.070 |
9th | Caltech | 1,116.7178 | 1,148.7468 | 1,132.6191 | 39.14 | 46.98 | -0.138 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Cal Lutheran | 0.3296 | 44.16 | 11.20 | 40.87 | 43.87 | 2.81 | 9.77 |
2nd | Claremont-M-S | 0.3276 | 42.99 | 10.23 | 40.55 | 43.89 | 3.29 | 10.66 |
3rd | La Verne | 0.3239 | 44.44 | 12.05 | 41.24 | 43.03 | 3.92 | 11.80 |
4th | Occidental | 0.2367 | 37.73 | 14.06 | 35.16 | 47.98 | 4.45 | 12.52 |
5th | Pomona-Pitzer | 0.2356 | 38.14 | 14.57 | 35.32 | 50.05 | 4.10 | 8.72 |
6th | Whittier | 0.2181 | 36.31 | 14.49 | 33.92 | 50.71 | 3.23 | 8.41 |
7th | Chapman | 0.2175 | 37.45 | 15.70 | 34.74 | 45.71 | 6.07 | 9.55 |
8th | Redlands | 0.2096 | 35.74 | 14.77 | 32.91 | 51.64 | 3.75 | 11.72 |
9th | Caltech | 0.0768 | 25.78 | 18.11 | 23.64 | 61.24 | 4.36 | 9.65 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Cal Lutheran | 0.0328 | 22.98 | 19.69 | 21.50 | 60.32 | 7.09 | 4.16 |
2nd | Claremont-M-S | 0.0434 | 19.63 | 15.29 | 18.33 | 69.01 | 4.69 | 3.10 |
3rd | La Verne | 0.0817 | 26.66 | 18.49 | 24.59 | 61.71 | 6.39 | 3.39 |
4th | Occidental | 0.1107 | 27.90 | 16.83 | 25.93 | 58.46 | 3.68 | 7.64 |
5th | Pomona-Pitzer | 0.1108 | 28.29 | 17.21 | 26.07 | 58.08 | 4.64 | 5.40 |
6th | Chapman | 0.1159 | 29.00 | 17.41 | 26.65 | 58.36 | 4.72 | 6.59 |
7th | Whittier | 0.1185 | 28.68 | 16.82 | 26.82 | 55.83 | 5.00 | 7.92 |
8th | Redlands | 0.1394 | 30.25 | 16.30 | 27.98 | 57.24 | 4.47 | 7.94 |
9th | Caltech | 0.2151 | 36.80 | 15.29 | 34.20 | 53.11 | 1.89 | 12.70 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,404.0097 | 1,417.5070 | 1,406.9675 | 1,388.8430 | 1,404.3318 |
Difference | 13.4973 | 2.9578 | -15.1667 | 0.4295 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Claremont-M-S | 92 | 1,831 | 974 | 175 | 109 | 53.20 | 10.5 | 16.8 | 1,426 | 546 | 86 | 119 | 61.71 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
Cal Lutheran | 108 | 2,569 | 1,330 | 191 | 161 | 51.77 | 13.5 | 16.0 | 2,072 | 797 | 122 | 219 | 61.54 | 17.0 | 9.5 |
La Verne | 100 | 1,859 | 936 | 221 | 213 | 50.35 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 1,555 | 608 | 99 | 162 | 60.90 | 15.7 | 9.6 |
Pomona-Pitzer | 94 | 1,685 | 809 | 150 | 146 | 48.01 | 11.2 | 11.5 | 1,651 | 777 | 151 | 177 | 52.94 | 10.9 | 9.3 |
Chapman | 82 | 1,802 | 859 | 146 | 140 | 47.67 | 12.3 | 12.9 | 1,786 | 849 | 159 | 165 | 52.46 | 11.2 | 10.8 |
Occidental | 87 | 1,741 | 798 | 193 | 186 | 45.84 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 1,752 | 816 | 171 | 148 | 53.43 | 10.2 | 11.8 |
Redlands | 91 | 1,569 | 731 | 220 | 182 | 46.59 | 7.1 | 8.6 | 1,658 | 818 | 186 | 188 | 50.66 | 8.9 | 8.8 |
Whittier | 93 | 1,898 | 856 | 129 | 138 | 45.10 | 14.7 | 13.8 | 2,071 | 1,045 | 206 | 168 | 49.54 | 10.1 | 12.3 |
Caltech | 54 | 725 | 235 | 65 | 99 | 32.41 | 11.2 | 7.3 | 1,230 | 762 | 192 | 124 | 38.05 | 6.4 | 9.9 |
Conference Average | 89 | 1,742 | 836 | 166 | 153 | 46.77 | 10.9 | 11.7 | 1,689 | 780 | 152 | 163 | 53.47 | 11.9 | 10.5 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
74.35 |
2016-10-18 | Claremont, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
72.74 |
2016-09-24 | Claremont, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
72.40 |
2016-09-30 | La Verne, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
71.74 |
2016-11-03 | Claremont, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
70.17 |
2016-10-21 | Thousand Oaks, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
68.83 |
2016-11-05 | Thousand Oaks, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
68.76 |
2016-10-29 | Claremont, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
68.72 |
2016-09-24 | Orange,CA |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
66.83 |
2016-10-04 | Thousand Oaks, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
66.75 |
2016-10-15 | Claremont, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Kylie Cooke | Chapman | A |
Monica Lundgren | Cal Lutheran | A |
Shelbi Stein | Claremont-M-S | A |
Cassie Thompson | La Verne | A |
Amanda Roberts | Cal Lutheran | D |
Mikena Warner | Claremont-M-S | D |
Kaitlyn Raymundo | Chapman | S |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Hope Stewart | Cal Lutheran |
2 | Jamie Smith | Cal Lutheran |
3 | Nicole Kerkhof | Claremont-M-S |
4 | Michelle Lawrence | Cal Lutheran |
5 | Nicki Tetherow | Cal Lutheran |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Hope Stewart | Cal Lutheran |
2 | Michelle Lawrence | Cal Lutheran |
3 | Sarah Pappas | Cal Lutheran |
4 | Kelsi Robinson | La Verne |
5 | Shelbi Stein | Claremont-M-S |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Jamie Smith | Cal Lutheran |
2 | Kaitlyn Raymundo | Chapman |
3 | Tiffany Mancuso | La Verne |
4 | Tiareh Cruz | Occidental |
5 | Clara Madsen | Claremont-M-S |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Nicki Tetherow | Cal Lutheran |
2 | Mikena Warner | Claremont-M-S |
3 | Kristen Sanchez | La Verne |
4 | Sara Utsugi | Chapman |
5 | Clarissa Standafer | Whittier |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hope Stewart | Cal Lutheran | 21.1810 |
2 | Jamie Smith | Cal Lutheran | 18.0056 |
3 | Nicki Tetherow | Cal Lutheran | 16.0015 |
4 | Nicole Kerkhof | Claremont-M-S | 15.8839 |
5 | Michelle Lawrence | Cal Lutheran | 15.0110 |
6 | Amanda Roberts | Cal Lutheran | 14.5091 |
7 | Amanda Herold | Occidental | 13.9178 |
8 | Tiffany Mancuso | La Verne | 13.6475 |
9 | Mikena Warner | Claremont-M-S | 12.9029 |
10 | Tiareh Cruz | Occidental | 12.8089 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jamie Smith | Cal Lutheran | 12.9389 |
2 | Hope Stewart | Cal Lutheran | 12.0174 |
3 | Kelsi Robinson | La Verne | 9.7711 |
4 | Tiffany Mancuso | La Verne | 9.7686 |
5 | Shelbi Stein | Claremont-M-S | 9.0333 |
6 | Tiareh Cruz | Occidental | 8.7581 |
7 | Rebecca Slattery | Whittier | 8.5236 |
8 | Sarah Pappas | Cal Lutheran | 8.2234 |
9 | Kaitlyn Raymundo | Chapman | 7.7835 |
10 | Nicole Kerkhof | Claremont-M-S | 7.6791 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Nicki Tetherow | Cal Lutheran | 14.5562 |
2 | Mikena Warner | Claremont-M-S | 11.1435 |
3 | Kristen Sanchez | La Verne | 9.7836 |
4 | Clarissa Standafer | Whittier | 9.2809 |
5 | Hope Stewart | Cal Lutheran | 9.1636 |
6 | Sara Utsugi | Chapman | 8.2205 |
7 | Nicole Kerkhof | Claremont-M-S | 8.2049 |
8 | Amanda Roberts | Cal Lutheran | 7.8983 |
9 | Michelle Lawrence | Cal Lutheran | 7.8616 |
10 | Amanda Herold | Occidental | 7.3707 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Nicole Kerkhof | Claremont-M-S | 0.2206 |
2 | Hope Stewart | Cal Lutheran | 0.2056 |
3 | Mikena Warner | Claremont-M-S | 0.1792 |
4 | Jamie Smith | Cal Lutheran | 0.1783 |
5 | Tiffany Mancuso | La Verne | 0.1750 |
6 | Kaitlyn Raymundo | Chapman | 0.1749 |
7 | Amanda Herold | Occidental | 0.1740 |
8 | Kelsi Robinson | La Verne | 0.1644 |
9 | Marisa Rojo | La Verne | 0.1636 |
10 | Tiareh Cruz | Occidental | 0.1621 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jamie Smith | Cal Lutheran | 0.1281 |
2 | Kelsi Robinson | La Verne | 0.1269 |
3 | Shelbi Stein | Claremont-M-S | 0.1255 |
4 | Tiffany Mancuso | La Verne | 0.1252 |
5 | Hope Stewart | Cal Lutheran | 0.1167 |
6 | Kaitlyn Raymundo | Chapman | 0.1112 |
7 | Tiareh Cruz | Occidental | 0.1109 |
8 | Nicole Kerkhof | Claremont-M-S | 0.1067 |
9 | Rebecca Slattery | Whittier | 0.0947 |
10 | Cassie Thompson | La Verne | 0.0886 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mikena Warner | Claremont-M-S | 0.1548 |
2 | Nicki Tetherow | Cal Lutheran | 0.1456 |
3 | Kristen Sanchez | La Verne | 0.1223 |
4 | Nicole Kerkhof | Claremont-M-S | 0.1140 |
5 | Sara Utsugi | Chapman | 0.1126 |
6 | Sophie Janssen | Pomona-Pitzer | 0.1090 |
7 | Abby Hickman | Redlands | 0.1075 |
8 | Clarissa Standafer | Whittier | 0.1067 |
9 | Lauren Lux | Redlands | 0.0949 |
10 | Claire Stohm | Occidental | 0.0934 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.