Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SCIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Claremont-M-S 1,554.3838 1,530.3441 1,542.3171 63.02 72.04 0.333
2nd Cal Lutheran 1,442.4787 1,409.8253 1,426.0585 58.30 64.82 0.212
3rd La Verne 1,438.1968 1,412.5321 1,425.3066 56.52 66.41 0.210
4th Whittier 1,425.1454 1,394.9506 1,409.9672 56.75 64.78 0.181
5th Chapman 1,406.9231 1,379.9809 1,393.3869 53.63 66.29 0.179
6th Occidental 1,371.4323 1,356.7708 1,364.0819 55.38 61.25 0.165
7th Pomona-Pitzer 1,326.5701 1,291.2795 1,308.8059 53.51 56.66 0.090
8th Redlands 1,285.4677 1,243.3312 1,264.2239 49.13 58.47 0.084
9th Caltech 1,197.2983 1,155.8937 1,176.4139 45.30 51.18 -0.015

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.3445 45.55 11.10 42.80 42.14 3.95 10.53
2nd Cal Lutheran 0.2936 40.15 10.79 37.40 49.43 2.89 9.51
3rd Chapman 0.2904 41.82 12.77 38.24 44.00 5.21 9.06
4th La Verne 0.2641 40.35 13.94 37.34 45.84 4.28 10.76
5th Whittier 0.2543 39.09 13.66 35.97 46.70 4.33 9.75
6th Occidental 0.2516 38.69 13.54 35.83 47.76 3.71 10.26
7th Pomona-Pitzer 0.2021 35.99 15.78 33.84 51.36 3.60 11.60
8th Redlands 0.1996 34.46 14.50 31.63 52.57 3.54 10.39
9th Caltech 0.1408 28.94 14.86 26.98 58.67 3.73 7.73

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.0112 20.81 19.70 19.68 64.46 6.77 3.58
2nd La Verne 0.0544 24.64 19.20 22.91 59.99 6.17 5.83
3rd Whittier 0.0731 26.37 19.06 24.85 58.66 5.24 4.57
4th Cal Lutheran 0.0814 25.81 17.67 24.06 59.97 4.09 5.53
5th Occidental 0.0861 26.87 18.25 24.70 59.92 4.08 7.03
6th Chapman 0.1118 29.00 17.82 26.93 56.99 4.74 6.51
7th Pomona-Pitzer 0.1123 28.55 17.32 26.29 57.22 5.30 6.79
8th Redlands 0.1158 29.54 17.96 27.72 55.01 5.20 7.41
9th Caltech 0.1560 31.55 15.95 28.81 56.61 2.94 7.19

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,367.8402 1,370.2616 1,380.3097 1,389.1453 1,376.8892
Difference 2.4213 12.4695 21.3051 12.0653

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Claremont-M-S 126 2,944 1,545 224 183 52.48 13.1 16.1 2,351 908 126 202 61.38 18.7 11.6
La Verne 109 2,296 1,104 199 204 48.08 11.5 11.3 2,099 898 154 203 57.22 13.6 10.3
Cal Lutheran 103 2,220 1,096 158 156 49.37 14.1 14.2 2,090 949 159 169 54.59 13.1 12.4
Whittier 104 2,299 1,100 169 130 47.85 13.6 17.7 2,210 998 141 171 54.84 15.7 12.9
Chapman 97 1,993 916 137 131 45.96 14.5 15.2 1,914 830 163 199 56.64 11.7 9.6
Occidental 89 1,925 944 156 169 49.04 12.3 11.4 1,833 853 150 169 53.46 12.2 10.8
Redlands 78 1,594 706 141 160 44.29 11.3 10.0 1,727 854 149 138 50.55 11.6 12.5
Pomona-Pitzer 100 1,685 751 171 153 44.57 9.9 11.0 1,982 1,060 190 170 46.52 10.4 11.7
Caltech 54 902 355 57 82 39.36 15.8 11.0 1,258 732 112 86 41.81 11.2 14.6
Conference Average 96 1,984 946 157 152 46.78 12.9 13.1 1,940 898 149 167 53.00 13.1 11.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.09

2017-09-23 Orange, Calif.
Chapman
Claremont-M-S
3
2
18
25
20
25
25
21
25
20
25
23
GAME

69.07

2017-10-10 Thousand Oaks, CA
Cal Lutheran
La Verne
2
3
22
25
12
25
25
20
25
23
13
15
GAME

67.83

2017-10-14 Whittier, Calif.
Whittier
Occidental
3
2
16
25
32
30
25
16
20
25
17
15
GAME

67.73

2017-10-17 La Verne, CA
La Verne
Claremont-M-S
2
3
25
17
16
25
26
24
22
25
10
15
GAME

67.01

2017-11-02 La Verne, CA
La Verne
Cal Lutheran
1
3
25
23
22
25
20
25
23
25
GAME

66.94

2017-09-23
Whittier
Cal Lutheran
2
3
21
25
25
14
25
21
23
25
10
15
GAME

66.01

2017-10-03 Los Angeles, CA
Occidental
Chapman
3
2
21
25
18
25
25
19
30
28
15
13
GAME

65.97

2017-10-03 Thousand Oaks, CA
Cal Lutheran
Claremont-M-S
1
3
13
25
25
17
15
25
21
25
GAME

65.79

2017-09-15 Orange,CA
Chapman
Whittier
3
0
25
22
26
24
25
21
GAME

65.71

2017-10-03 Whittier, Calif.
Whittier
La Verne
3
2
25
21
22
25
22
25
25
15
15
11

HuskerGeek SCIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 18.4537
2 18.4309
3 16.5709
4 15.9067
5 15.1523
6 15.1112
7 14.5571
8 14.4861
9 14.4561
10 14.4262

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.0026
2 10.5248
3 9.6231
4 9.3512
5 8.5354
6 7.9321
7 7.3279
8 7.2227
9 7.1979
10 7.0815

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.9495
2 14.7086
3 13.1501
4 8.2798
5 8.1715
6 7.9061
7 7.9047
8 7.7905
9 7.7833
10 7.4269

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1772
2 0.1646
3 0.1578
4 0.1575
5 0.1567
6 0.1538
7 0.1521
8 0.1511
9 0.1457
10 0.1432

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1012
2 0.1000
3 0.0926
4 0.0835
5 0.0829
6 0.0821
7 0.0802
8 0.0795
9 0.0781
10 0.0733

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1401
2 0.1329
3 0.1264
4 0.1236
5 0.1157
6 0.1051
7 0.0974
8 0.0866
9 0.0861
10 0.0855


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek