Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,694.2539

Football georgia 11.9216
Men's Basketball arizona 10.5146
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.2365
Ice Hockey minnesota st 8.1338
Men's Soccer washington 9.3221
Women's Soccer florida st 10.8390
Men's Volleyball hawaii 9.0598
Women's Volleyball louisville 11.6893
Field Hockey iowa 10.0663

SCIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Claremont-M-S 1,643.6239 1,638.7047 1,641.1625 62.15 63.81 0.310
2nd Pomona-Pitzer 1,526.2072 1,523.8463 1,525.0263 64.69 52.12 0.203
3rd Chapman 1,516.0439 1,512.4246 1,514.2332 60.64 55.92 0.184
4th Cal Lutheran 1,508.2317 1,501.2510 1,504.7373 61.39 51.93 0.191
5th Whittier 1,476.0169 1,470.0042 1,473.0075 58.31 54.82 0.124
6th La Verne 1,475.4988 1,468.8975 1,472.1944 62.26 51.78 0.144
7th Caltech 1,463.4101 1,453.2988 1,458.3457 50.23 52.44 0.145
8th Occidental 1,399.7606 1,396.3037 1,398.0310 56.00 51.50 0.071
9th Redlands 1,329.8691 1,325.5855 1,327.7256 44.71 52.99 -0.006

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.3716 46.92 9.76 43.55 41.41 3.00 11.09
2nd Chapman 0.2744 40.28 12.84 37.31 45.44 4.33 7.52
3rd Cal Lutheran 0.2596 38.34 12.39 35.04 50.00 3.73 10.02
4th Caltech 0.2451 37.25 12.74 34.15 49.06 4.13 7.23
5th Pomona-Pitzer 0.2351 37.96 14.45 35.22 48.98 4.17 9.44
6th La Verne 0.2171 35.47 13.76 32.53 49.22 4.19 7.50
7th Whittier 0.2046 35.10 14.65 32.44 51.61 4.45 10.41
8th Occidental 0.2006 34.70 14.63 32.49 52.64 5.51 10.02
9th Redlands 0.1717 32.59 15.42 30.42 54.91 3.89 10.19

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Pomona-Pitzer 0.0319 22.22 19.03 20.94 63.85 6.43 8.31
2nd Claremont-M-S 0.0619 23.29 17.11 21.26 62.35 5.21 4.81
3rd Cal Lutheran 0.0681 25.68 18.87 23.38 57.04 6.60 9.05
4th La Verne 0.0729 23.85 16.56 22.04 61.70 4.80 5.83
5th Whittier 0.0803 26.11 18.08 24.71 58.59 5.26 6.96
6th Chapman 0.0906 25.84 16.78 23.99 60.65 4.62 5.94
7th Caltech 0.1005 26.78 16.73 24.28 58.80 4.60 8.63
8th Occidental 0.1297 31.01 18.04 28.75 56.74 4.38 8.25
9th Redlands 0.1779 32.86 15.07 30.70 54.21 4.12 6.00

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,479.3848 1,477.9393 1,484.5036 1,483.3131 1,481.2852
Difference -1.4455 5.1188 3.9282 2.5338

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Claremont-M-S 117 1,445 763 249 174 52.80 5.8 8.3 1,195 522 130 146 56.32 9.2 8.2
Pomona-Pitzer 95 1,570 893 150 150 56.88 10.5 10.5 1,459 779 172 142 46.61 8.5 10.3
La Verne 84 1,303 726 122 153 55.72 10.7 8.5 1,289 687 145 137 46.70 8.9 9.4
Chapman 94 1,585 837 111 104 52.81 14.3 15.2 1,550 787 136 155 49.23 11.4 10.0
Cal Lutheran 100 1,615 855 155 129 52.94 10.4 12.5 1,647 907 217 164 44.93 7.6 10.0
Whittier 91 1,041 523 134 147 50.24 7.8 7.1 1,127 594 143 190 47.29 7.9 5.9
Occidental 74 898 453 129 129 50.45 7.0 7.0 992 530 135 112 46.57 7.3 8.9
Caltech 57 538 256 88 95 47.58 6.1 5.7 568 298 104 81 47.54 5.5 7.0
Redlands 53 566 210 71 90 37.10 8.0 6.3 758 406 80 93 46.44 9.5 8.2
Conference Average 85 1,173 613 134 130 50.72 8.9 9.0 1,176 612 140 136 47.96 8.4 8.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.07

2021-10-19
La Verne
Whittier
2
3
24
26
25
16
27
25
21
25
15
17
GAME

73.35

2021-10-15
Cal Lutheran
Claremont-M-S
0
3
21
25
19
25
11
25
GAME

72.15

2021-10-12
Chapman
Whittier
1
3
26
28
16
25
25
21
15
25
GAME

71.79

2021-10-26
Chapman
Claremont-M-S
2
3
21
25
25
18
25
20
19
25
8
15
GAME

70.78

2021-09-28
Cal Lutheran
Chapman
2
3
25
21
25
19
23
25
20
25
12
15
GAME

70.53

2021-10-19
Cal Lutheran
Pomona-Pitzer
2
3
12
25
25
27
25
23
25
22
7
15
GAME

69.75

2021-09-28
La Verne
Pomona-Pitzer
1
3
25
19
16
25
28
30
17
25
GAME

69.73

2021-10-16
Chapman
Cal Lutheran
3
1
25
19
26
24
17
25
25
22
GAME

69.52

2021-11-04
Pomona-Pitzer
Chapman
0
3
24
26
16
25
24
26
GAME

68.84

2021-10-02
Cal Lutheran
Whittier
3
0
25
17
25
16
29
27

HuskerGeek SCIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 16.5414
2 13.4597
3 12.8737
4 12.6829
5 12.2766
6 12.2018
7 11.8827
8 11.6881
9 10.5767
10 10.5194

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.3296
2 8.9075
3 6.5670
4 6.3067
5 6.1664
6 5.9483
7 5.5511
8 5.3977
9 5.3462
10 5.1874

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.9368
2 11.7010
3 10.2187
4 8.9956
5 7.3606
6 7.2933
7 7.2118
8 7.0960
9 6.6641
10 6.3761

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2377
2 0.2361
3 0.2297
4 0.2164
5 0.1982
6 0.1811
7 0.1788
8 0.1779
9 0.1753
10 0.1695

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1296
2 0.1237
3 0.1216
4 0.1082
5 0.1045
6 0.1008
7 0.0985
8 0.0982
9 0.0957
10 0.0910

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1696
2 0.1658
3 0.1572
4 0.1499
5 0.1436
6 0.1419
7 0.1334
8 0.1314
9 0.1280
10 0.1278


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek