Nerdly Nebraska.

2022-2023 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Texas 1,730.6611

Football georgia 11.6118
Men's Basketball houston 9.4563
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.7610
Softball columbia 5.0000
Ice Hockey minnesota 8.5914
Men's Lacrosse marquette 7.9259
Men's Soccer kentucky 8.7687
Women's Soccer ucla 11.0741
Men's Volleyball long beach st 9.3011
Women's Volleyball texas 12.4762
Field Hockey north carolina 10.0384

SCIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Claremont-M-S 1,658.3931 1,656.8804 1,657.6366 64.31 69.40 0.383
2nd Pomona-Pitzer 1,526.9943 1,520.6105 1,523.7991 59.99 57.93 0.204
3rd Cal Lutheran 1,522.1975 1,518.4785 1,520.3369 61.04 57.60 0.218
4th La Verne 1,520.3430 1,519.7494 1,520.0462 59.20 59.52 0.222
5th Whittier 1,436.0799 1,437.9360 1,437.0077 58.39 51.88 0.121
6th Chapman 1,438.1980 1,435.2754 1,436.7359 56.61 53.93 0.134
7th Caltech 1,404.6147 1,403.5401 1,404.0773 56.89 49.27 0.084
8th Occidental 1,371.9876 1,371.9795 1,371.9835 53.50 51.49 0.071
9th Redlands 1,274.7961 1,269.5335 1,272.1621 50.96 44.57 -0.027

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.3980 49.29 9.49 45.80 37.09 2.89 11.56
2nd Cal Lutheran 0.2918 41.46 12.28 37.53 44.53 3.62 10.81
3rd La Verne 0.2779 40.94 13.16 37.33 42.91 4.08 11.44
4th Pomona-Pitzer 0.2563 38.12 12.49 35.30 47.74 3.37 9.36
5th Chapman 0.2464 37.72 13.08 35.04 48.43 4.52 9.08
6th Caltech 0.2124 34.92 13.68 32.28 49.22 3.52 10.48
7th Whittier 0.2055 34.68 14.13 31.42 51.72 4.10 10.32
8th Occidental 0.2031 36.64 16.33 33.71 48.95 4.84 10.48
9th Redlands 0.1372 31.25 17.53 28.56 55.99 3.28 11.43

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.0154 21.11 19.57 19.31 63.21 6.53 5.82
2nd Pomona-Pitzer 0.0523 24.28 19.05 22.53 61.49 6.28 5.71
3rd La Verne 0.0555 23.88 18.33 22.61 62.14 6.26 6.19
4th Cal Lutheran 0.0737 26.34 18.97 24.48 57.16 6.20 7.51
5th Whittier 0.0843 26.83 18.41 24.84 57.65 6.00 7.40
6th Chapman 0.1122 28.09 16.86 26.98 59.60 4.52 7.52
7th Caltech 0.1285 29.74 16.89 27.34 56.82 4.21 8.41
8th Occidental 0.1324 31.20 17.95 28.34 55.66 4.89 7.73
9th Redlands 0.1645 33.91 17.46 30.47 53.42 5.44 9.66

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,460.4206 1,459.1409 1,463.6408 1,464.5966 1,461.9497
Difference -1.2796 3.2202 4.1760 2.0389

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Claremont-M-S 99 2,420 1,341 219 190 55.41 11.1 12.7 1,771 649 124 136 63.35 14.3 13.0
Pomona-Pitzer 98 2,085 1,080 160 173 51.80 13.0 12.1 1,938 922 146 197 52.43 13.3 9.8
Cal Lutheran 99 2,163 1,134 180 154 52.43 12.0 14.0 2,013 972 173 191 51.71 11.6 10.5
La Verne 102 2,143 1,086 203 196 50.68 10.6 10.9 2,024 955 155 144 52.82 13.1 14.1
Whittier 97 1,859 939 168 124 50.51 11.1 15.0 1,901 996 175 192 47.61 10.9 9.9
Chapman 82 1,559 745 119 89 47.79 13.1 17.5 1,698 880 160 127 48.17 10.6 13.4
Caltech 56 1,110 546 93 70 49.19 11.9 15.9 1,232 679 116 98 44.89 10.6 12.6
Occidental 73 1,483 685 126 137 46.19 11.8 10.8 1,699 907 152 118 46.62 11.2 14.4
Redlands 69 1,166 499 108 120 42.80 10.8 9.7 1,617 977 174 103 39.58 9.3 15.7
Conference Average 86 1,776 895 153 139 49.64 11.7 13.2 1,766 882 153 145 49.69 11.6 12.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.15

2022-10-15
Pomona-Pitzer
La Verne
3
0
29
27
25
20
25
17
GAME

70.96

2022-10-18
Chapman
Claremont-M-S
0
3
16
25
25
27
16
25
GAME

70.63

2022-10-28 La Verne, CA
La Verne
Cal Lutheran
3
2
19
25
25
12
21
25
25
15
15
12
GAME

70.56

2022-11-05 Claremont, CA
Claremont-M-S
Pomona-Pitzer
3
0
25
20
25
23
25
19
GAME

69.90

2022-09-27
Whittier
Pomona-Pitzer
2
3
18
25
22
25
25
14
30
28
13
15
GAME

69.84

2022-09-24 La Verne, CA
La Verne
Claremont-M-S
0
3
23
25
20
25
19
25
GAME

69.82

2022-09-23
Cal Lutheran
La Verne
3
2
19
25
26
28
25
22
25
13
15
7
GAME

69.45

2022-10-07
Pomona-Pitzer
Cal Lutheran
0
3
24
26
16
25
20
25
GAME

69.40

2022-10-21
Cal Lutheran
Pomona-Pitzer
3
2
24
26
21
25
25
20
25
18
15
12
GAME

69.03

2022-10-01
Chapman
Cal Lutheran
0
3
20
25
21
25
21
25

HuskerGeek SCIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 20.6649
2 18.3294
3 16.4063
4 15.9589
5 15.5344
6 14.5325
7 13.4993
8 13.3196
9 13.1413
10 12.7335

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.2901
2 11.1393
3 7.9245
4 7.8535
5 7.4957
6 7.3796
7 7.1368
8 7.0039
9 6.8043
10 6.7374

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 13.7727
2 13.6433
3 12.4768
4 11.4813
5 10.4759
6 9.6791
7 9.5255
8 8.6350
9 7.5459
10 7.4618

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2222
2 0.2073
3 0.1851
4 0.1761
5 0.1752
6 0.1657
7 0.1653
8 0.1612
9 0.1580
10 0.1476

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1241
2 0.1198
3 0.1072
4 0.0973
5 0.0973
6 0.0921
7 0.0865
8 0.0858
9 0.0800
10 0.0793

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1531
2 0.1465
3 0.1378
4 0.1279
5 0.1260
6 0.1095
7 0.1063
8 0.1058
9 0.1024
10 0.1019


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek