Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,724.7831

Football ohio st 10.8908
Ice Hockey michigan 5.0000
Men's Soccer marshall 10.0965
Women's Soccer penn st 9.9817
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.7753
Field Hockey northwestern 9.9036

SCIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Claremont-M-S 1,669.3127 1,667.8540 1,668.5832 62.78 65.35 0.316
2nd La Verne 1,610.4357 1,610.2691 1,610.3524 61.91 62.17 0.273
3rd Pomona-Pitzer 1,494.2433 1,494.5948 1,494.4190 60.67 53.57 0.180
4th Whittier 1,480.0801 1,476.0055 1,478.0414 55.88 55.35 0.154
5th Cal Lutheran 1,475.2948 1,471.3438 1,473.3180 59.35 53.70 0.142
6th Chapman 1,446.2975 1,446.8985 1,446.5980 57.36 52.31 0.110
7th Caltech 1,417.9256 1,415.6818 1,416.8032 58.95 47.44 0.050
8th Redlands 1,343.7994 1,338.5165 1,341.1553 50.37 49.25 0.011
9th Occidental 1,315.1914 1,315.4387 1,315.3151 48.21 49.07 0.012

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.3543 46.35 10.92 42.84 40.15 2.80 11.65
2nd La Verne 0.3263 43.97 11.34 41.35 42.60 3.82 11.02
3rd Pomona-Pitzer 0.2517 36.23 11.05 33.89 51.70 3.38 10.27
4th Cal Lutheran 0.2488 37.09 12.21 32.41 48.59 4.28 8.85
5th Whittier 0.2361 37.99 14.37 34.98 49.75 4.35 10.19
6th Chapman 0.2317 37.27 14.10 34.46 48.44 4.43 9.74
7th Caltech 0.2123 34.98 13.76 32.67 51.37 3.29 12.20
8th Redlands 0.1703 31.15 14.13 28.89 55.25 4.28 6.92
9th Occidental 0.1563 29.55 13.92 26.63 58.94 3.75 10.91

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.0378 21.08 17.30 19.49 67.40 5.32 5.71
2nd La Verne 0.0531 22.17 16.85 20.75 64.17 4.59 4.21
3rd Pomona-Pitzer 0.0714 25.08 17.94 23.47 61.08 5.09 6.88
4th Whittier 0.0820 26.32 18.12 25.13 59.52 6.02 7.82
5th Cal Lutheran 0.1066 28.63 17.97 26.06 59.03 5.03 7.09
6th Chapman 0.1214 29.43 17.29 27.53 56.60 3.90 8.45
7th Occidental 0.1445 32.17 17.73 29.38 53.56 4.09 8.57
8th Redlands 0.1593 32.55 16.62 29.49 51.90 4.55 8.58
9th Caltech 0.1621 32.63 16.42 30.22 54.08 2.90 9.05

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,471.6206 1,465.8125 1,461.8359 1,465.9858 1,466.3137
Difference -5.8081 -9.7847 -5.6348 -7.0759

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Claremont-M-S 49 1,144 610 100 91 53.32 11.4 12.6 914 379 62 68 58.53 14.7 13.4
La Verne 54 1,266 674 109 104 53.24 11.6 12.2 1,039 452 55 104 56.50 18.9 10.0
Pomona-Pitzer 61 1,233 659 103 84 53.45 12.0 14.7 1,209 631 101 99 47.81 12.0 12.2
Cal Lutheran 60 1,122 580 92 94 51.69 12.2 11.9 1,155 595 103 114 48.49 11.2 10.1
Caltech 32 650 347 66 60 53.39 9.8 10.8 697 390 66 66 44.05 10.6 10.6
Whittier 58 1,217 580 93 93 47.66 13.1 13.1 1,260 645 112 125 48.81 11.3 10.1
Chapman 55 1,084 528 83 79 48.71 13.1 13.7 1,165 613 112 110 47.38 10.4 10.6
Redlands 36 722 340 40 44 47.09 18.1 16.4 804 431 73 93 46.39 11.0 8.6
Occidental 31 576 242 51 61 42.01 11.3 9.4 729 394 67 51 45.95 10.9 14.3
Conference Average 48 1,002 507 82 79 50.06 12.5 12.8 997 503 83 92 49.32 12.3 11.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

77.26

2023-10-03 Claremont, CA
Claremont-M-S
La Verne
3
0
27
25
25
16
26
24
GAME

72.85

2023-09-23 Whittier, Calif.
Whittier
La Verne
2
3
23
25
25
21
23
25
25
23
4
15
GAME

70.51

2023-09-30
Pomona-Pitzer
Claremont-M-S
0
3
17
25
23
25
10
25
GAME

69.60

2023-09-23
Caltech
Pomona-Pitzer
3
2
25
20
24
26
25
21
19
25
15
9
GAME

69.15

2023-09-22
Pomona-Pitzer
Whittier
3
0
25
22
25
22
25
19
GAME

68.69

2023-09-26
Cal Lutheran
Whittier
1
3
23
25
22
25
25
23
24
26
GAME

68.27

2023-09-30
Cal Lutheran
Chapman
3
0
25
22
29
27
25
19
GAME

67.88

2023-09-23
Chapman
Redlands
3
2
25
22
21
25
25
20
17
25
15
13
GAME

67.79

2023-09-26
Pomona-Pitzer
Chapman
3
0
25
20
25
19
25
23
GAME

67.60

2023-09-29
Chapman
La Verne
0
3
23
25
14
25
20
25

HuskerGeek SCIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 12.9404
2 11.3296
3 11.0317
4 11.0052
5 10.8961
6 10.6672
7 10.2879
8 9.8284
9 9.7770
10 9.1172

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 8.9042
2 7.2968
3 6.9842
4 6.6616
5 6.1917
6 5.1179
7 4.9913
8 4.3457
9 4.0645
10 3.9385

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 8.6303
2 7.7859
3 7.4258
4 6.6893
5 6.5987
6 6.4392
7 5.8385
8 5.5493
9 5.1746
10 4.9339

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2641
2 0.2246
3 0.2163
4 0.2143
5 0.2136
6 0.2092
7 0.2082
8 0.2023
9 0.1964
10 0.1906

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1817
2 0.1431
3 0.1369
4 0.1360
5 0.1290
6 0.1004
7 0.0876
8 0.0865
9 0.0836
10 0.0790

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1589
2 0.1568
3 0.1514
4 0.1486
5 0.1369
6 0.1338
7 0.1326
8 0.1298
9 0.1269
10 0.1265


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek