Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SEC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Kentucky 1,777.0364 1,775.9822 1,776.5092 87.11 91.82 0.416
2nd Florida 1,706.5537 1,701.9635 1,704.2570 81.48 89.71 0.342
3rd Missouri 1,637.5720 1,640.4353 1,639.0030 76.81 90.33 0.242
4th Tennessee 1,615.2180 1,617.7399 1,616.4785 81.20 84.33 0.258
5th LSU 1,602.9249 1,604.7222 1,603.8233 77.97 85.63 0.219
6th Arkansas 1,596.1747 1,595.4759 1,595.8252 79.48 82.14 0.212
7th Texas A&M 1,567.0164 1,568.5965 1,567.8063 74.01 77.89 0.187
8th South Carolina 1,564.0709 1,568.4295 1,566.2487 75.78 85.65 0.199
9th Georgia 1,539.7514 1,545.5687 1,542.6573 76.04 82.42 0.171
10th Mississippi St. 1,513.1155 1,517.8932 1,515.5025 76.62 79.45 0.152
11th Ole Miss 1,514.5435 1,516.2162 1,515.3796 70.87 82.79 0.145
12th Alabama 1,508.2675 1,508.2042 1,508.2358 76.88 76.20 0.118
13th Auburn 1,456.5531 1,459.0199 1,457.7860 71.13 78.07 0.140

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Kentucky 0.5212 53.39 1.27 49.46 34.47 2.03 9.20
2nd Florida 0.4475 48.44 3.69 45.85 38.97 2.77 9.73
3rd Missouri 0.4332 46.48 3.16 42.07 38.79 3.01 8.68
4th Tennessee 0.4034 43.30 2.95 38.69 43.01 2.85 6.07
5th South Carolina 0.4010 45.59 5.49 43.13 39.63 4.39 7.88
6th Arkansas 0.3807 42.07 4.00 39.71 44.41 4.82 9.49
7th LSU 0.3784 43.12 5.28 39.95 43.37 3.53 8.35
8th Ole Miss 0.3684 44.75 7.91 42.55 39.09 4.13 7.83
9th Texas A&M 0.3578 41.66 5.88 38.36 44.13 4.73 11.84
10th Georgia 0.3561 40.87 5.26 37.79 44.62 5.01 9.02
11th Auburn 0.3516 37.55 2.39 36.81 48.96 1.57 6.78
12th Mississippi St. 0.3402 39.68 5.65 37.48 46.47 3.52 7.98
13th Alabama 0.3256 39.82 7.26 37.36 44.75 4.95 9.61

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Kentucky 0.1050 24.25 13.75 21.91 59.12 9.29 3.22
2nd Florida 0.1051 23.38 12.87 20.66 58.96 8.88 3.30
3rd Tennessee 0.1457 26.06 11.49 22.00 58.95 8.33 2.74
4th LSU 0.1593 26.14 10.21 23.03 58.70 6.72 3.90
5th Arkansas 0.1692 26.87 9.95 25.10 58.03 6.91 3.88
6th Texas A&M 0.1711 27.22 10.11 23.75 59.20 6.62 5.19
7th Georgia 0.1851 28.63 10.12 24.88 55.77 7.84 4.24
8th Mississippi St. 0.1880 28.61 9.81 26.04 55.89 6.34 5.56
9th Missouri 0.1912 29.23 10.11 26.23 55.18 6.96 4.82
10th South Carolina 0.2025 29.93 9.68 26.67 52.78 8.12 4.98
11th Alabama 0.2071 29.10 8.39 26.38 56.03 7.16 5.66
12th Auburn 0.2120 31.85 10.65 29.76 49.29 7.67 7.85
13th Ole Miss 0.2238 32.42 10.04 29.24 51.19 7.43 5.96

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,585.3471 1,579.5652 1,573.6360 1,572.6202 1,577.7922
Difference -5.7819 -11.7111 -12.7269 -10.0733

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Kentucky 76 1,840 978 122 156 53.15 15.1 11.8 1,378 493 65 133 64.22 21.2 10.4
Missouri 84 1,983 1,009 115 175 50.88 17.2 11.3 1,665 642 100 218 61.44 16.7 7.6
South Carolina 77 1,809 952 95 165 52.63 19.0 11.0 1,529 641 97 171 58.08 15.8 8.9
Florida 76 1,682 780 118 170 46.37 14.3 9.9 1,490 582 72 151 60.94 20.7 9.9
Tennessee 68 1,552 746 57 177 48.07 27.2 8.8 1,434 615 60 166 57.11 23.9 8.6
LSU 81 1,668 725 97 160 43.47 17.2 10.4 1,635 698 88 157 57.31 18.6 10.4
Arkansas 76 1,646 754 110 209 45.81 15.0 7.9 1,681 776 91 174 53.84 18.5 9.7
Georgia 77 1,518 626 100 206 41.24 15.2 7.4 1,648 754 92 182 54.25 17.9 9.1
Mississippi St. 75 1,435 619 80 161 43.14 17.9 8.9 1,584 767 116 146 51.58 13.7 10.8
Alabama 58 1,201 528 84 125 43.96 14.3 9.6 1,340 687 93 159 48.73 14.4 8.4
Ole Miss 64 1,305 478 67 151 36.63 19.5 8.6 1,479 675 111 168 54.36 13.3 8.8
Auburn 12 201 67 5 32 33.33 40.2 6.3 292 164 24 26 43.84 12.2 11.2
Texas A&M 61 694 294 80 111 42.36 8.7 6.3 1,254 934 106 133 25.52 11.8 9.4
Conference Average 68 1,426 658 87 154 44.70 18.5 9.1 1,416 648 86 153 53.17 16.8 9.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SEC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

81.77

2021-03-19 Gainesville, Fla.
Florida
Kentucky
3
2
18
25
27
25
17
25
25
16
17
15
GAME

80.22

2020-10-28 Columbia, MO
Missouri
Kentucky
1
3
25
23
33
35
20
25
18
25
GAME

78.71

2021-03-12 Gainesville, Fla.
Florida
Missouri
3
2
23
25
23
25
25
19
27
25
15
13
GAME

77.44

2020-10-18
Mississippi St.
Arkansas
2
3
25
23
25
19
29
31
23
25
13
15
GAME

76.85

2021-02-12
Tennessee
Missouri
3
2
27
25
25
27
18
25
26
24
15
11
GAME

76.28

2020-11-04 Columbia, MO
Missouri
Arkansas
3
2
25
13
25
22
21
25
25
27
15
6
GAME

75.82

2020-11-12 Columbia, S.C.
South Carolina
Florida
3
2
25
21
17
25
21
25
25
13
15
12
GAME

75.62

2021-03-20 Gainesville, Fla.
Florida
Kentucky
0
3
20
25
18
25
21
25
GAME

75.47

2021-02-26
Tennessee
Florida
0
3
23
25
27
29
16
25
GAME

75.44

2020-11-05 Columbia, MO
Missouri
Arkansas
3
0
28
26
25
19
29
27

HuskerGeek SEC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 18.7438
2 17.7696
3 17.4277
4 17.1514
5 16.6125
6 15.6372
7 15.4160
8 15.0321
9 14.5731
10 13.7590

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.4603
2 11.8292
3 11.4271
4 11.1911
5 10.5376
6 9.5061
7 9.2445
8 8.8897
9 8.3721
10 8.3438

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 10.1758
2 9.1445
3 8.5319
4 8.4859
5 8.4645
6 8.1500
7 8.0161
8 7.3138
9 7.2585
10 7.2320

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2575
2 0.2466
3 0.2293
4 0.2257
5 0.2186
6 0.2143
7 0.2059
8 0.2058
9 0.2028
10 0.1992

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1640
2 0.1556
3 0.1527
4 0.1504
5 0.1473
6 0.1414
7 0.1368
8 0.1321
9 0.1251
10 0.1231

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1454
2 0.1345
3 0.1272
4 0.1164
5 0.1123
6 0.1118
7 0.1117
8 0.1114
9 0.1048
10 0.1036


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek