Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Kentucky | 1,674.4071 | 1,678.1120 | 1,676.2585 | 59.07 | 63.23 | 0.271 |
2nd | Florida | 1,634.2763 | 1,638.0283 | 1,636.1512 | 55.05 | 62.56 | 0.261 |
3rd | Tennessee | 1,591.3137 | 1,599.8737 | 1,595.5880 | 54.62 | 62.43 | 0.213 |
4th | Mississippi St. | 1,554.7719 | 1,558.0458 | 1,556.4080 | 53.09 | 59.43 | 0.155 |
5th | LSU | 1,547.2764 | 1,548.7816 | 1,548.0289 | 52.43 | 57.29 | 0.164 |
6th | Ole Miss | 1,541.8508 | 1,548.0868 | 1,544.9657 | 52.74 | 58.84 | 0.150 |
7th | Arkansas | 1,541.2490 | 1,546.3086 | 1,543.7767 | 53.25 | 58.23 | 0.139 |
8th | Georgia | 1,518.4745 | 1,528.0389 | 1,523.2492 | 50.92 | 57.36 | 0.117 |
9th | South Carolina | 1,510.9291 | 1,524.7129 | 1,517.8053 | 51.19 | 61.38 | 0.138 |
10th | Texas A&M | 1,491.7589 | 1,503.5224 | 1,497.6291 | 52.50 | 54.79 | 0.105 |
11th | Auburn | 1,468.7707 | 1,482.7136 | 1,475.7257 | 54.12 | 53.97 | 0.089 |
12th | Alabama | 1,432.3636 | 1,443.3859 | 1,437.8642 | 51.21 | 50.48 | 0.013 |
13th | Missouri | 1,426.8661 | 1,434.3043 | 1,430.5804 | 47.26 | 52.36 | 0.041 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Kentucky | 0.3723 | 48.12 | 10.89 | 43.53 | 39.66 | 3.71 | 7.35 |
2nd | Florida | 0.3580 | 46.74 | 10.94 | 43.56 | 40.08 | 3.90 | 7.15 |
3rd | Tennessee | 0.3325 | 44.68 | 11.43 | 40.67 | 43.27 | 4.29 | 5.57 |
4th | South Carolina | 0.3042 | 42.91 | 12.49 | 39.13 | 44.87 | 5.19 | 7.83 |
5th | Ole Miss | 0.2977 | 43.45 | 13.69 | 38.58 | 40.74 | 4.68 | 6.00 |
6th | LSU | 0.2971 | 41.98 | 12.28 | 37.70 | 45.00 | 4.28 | 6.98 |
7th | Mississippi St. | 0.2886 | 42.42 | 13.57 | 38.42 | 42.83 | 5.66 | 6.43 |
8th | Georgia | 0.2843 | 42.94 | 14.50 | 39.77 | 42.44 | 6.27 | 7.83 |
9th | Arkansas | 0.2742 | 40.54 | 13.11 | 37.32 | 45.47 | 6.13 | 8.17 |
10th | Missouri | 0.2494 | 38.86 | 13.92 | 35.79 | 47.87 | 5.50 | 6.78 |
11th | Texas A&M | 0.2493 | 39.23 | 14.30 | 35.77 | 46.86 | 5.01 | 6.43 |
12th | Auburn | 0.2262 | 34.59 | 11.97 | 31.23 | 53.92 | 3.96 | 4.96 |
13th | Alabama | 0.2093 | 36.85 | 15.92 | 33.29 | 47.65 | 6.22 | 6.45 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Florida | 0.0966 | 27.66 | 18.00 | 25.52 | 55.67 | 8.53 | 4.73 |
2nd | Kentucky | 0.1012 | 28.67 | 18.56 | 26.28 | 54.36 | 8.03 | 3.23 |
3rd | Tennessee | 0.1190 | 29.66 | 17.76 | 27.46 | 54.93 | 8.93 | 3.93 |
4th | LSU | 0.1333 | 30.70 | 17.37 | 28.06 | 52.28 | 7.98 | 6.12 |
5th | Mississippi St. | 0.1335 | 30.57 | 17.22 | 28.74 | 53.24 | 6.50 | 4.88 |
6th | Arkansas | 0.1352 | 29.96 | 16.44 | 28.08 | 55.38 | 6.60 | 4.32 |
7th | Auburn | 0.1376 | 30.89 | 17.13 | 28.56 | 52.33 | 6.78 | 5.84 |
8th | Texas A&M | 0.1441 | 29.83 | 15.42 | 27.25 | 57.42 | 6.11 | 7.24 |
9th | Ole Miss | 0.1472 | 32.40 | 17.68 | 29.01 | 50.33 | 7.58 | 4.32 |
10th | South Carolina | 0.1667 | 34.59 | 17.92 | 32.54 | 47.89 | 8.07 | 4.77 |
11th | Georgia | 0.1673 | 34.15 | 17.42 | 31.68 | 49.49 | 7.59 | 5.30 |
12th | Alabama | 0.1965 | 34.80 | 15.15 | 32.30 | 50.06 | 5.79 | 5.00 |
13th | Missouri | 0.2080 | 36.34 | 15.54 | 32.63 | 49.05 | 6.82 | 6.41 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,537.2331 | 1,534.2902 | 1,533.6863 | 1,533.1233 | 1,534.5832 |
Difference | -2.9430 | -3.5469 | -4.1099 | -3.5332 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Kentucky | 106 | 2,050 | 1,061 | 148 | 206 | 51.76 | 13.9 | 10.0 | 1,724 | 733 | 86 | 193 | 57.48 | 20.0 | 8.9 |
Tennessee | 109 | 2,093 | 1,030 | 113 | 207 | 49.21 | 18.5 | 10.1 | 1,859 | 780 | 99 | 204 | 58.04 | 18.8 | 9.1 |
Florida | 106 | 1,885 | 911 | 151 | 236 | 48.33 | 12.5 | 8.0 | 1,730 | 739 | 107 | 200 | 57.28 | 16.2 | 8.7 |
Auburn | 103 | 2,044 | 1,072 | 101 | 200 | 52.45 | 20.2 | 10.2 | 1,951 | 929 | 134 | 208 | 52.38 | 14.6 | 9.4 |
Ole Miss | 110 | 2,310 | 1,130 | 132 | 209 | 48.92 | 17.5 | 11.1 | 2,116 | 942 | 111 | 259 | 55.48 | 19.1 | 8.2 |
Mississippi St. | 125 | 2,662 | 1,288 | 156 | 267 | 48.39 | 17.1 | 10.0 | 2,465 | 1,088 | 137 | 269 | 55.86 | 18.0 | 9.2 |
Arkansas | 116 | 2,420 | 1,189 | 187 | 324 | 49.13 | 12.9 | 7.5 | 2,307 | 1,052 | 110 | 220 | 54.40 | 21.0 | 10.5 |
South Carolina | 103 | 1,520 | 690 | 130 | 225 | 45.40 | 11.7 | 6.8 | 1,430 | 604 | 131 | 238 | 57.76 | 10.9 | 6.0 |
LSU | 109 | 2,278 | 1,058 | 141 | 251 | 46.44 | 16.2 | 9.1 | 2,267 | 1,065 | 155 | 213 | 53.02 | 14.6 | 10.6 |
Georgia | 114 | 2,264 | 1,032 | 167 | 247 | 45.58 | 13.6 | 9.2 | 2,315 | 1,092 | 142 | 260 | 52.83 | 16.3 | 8.9 |
Texas A&M | 106 | 1,967 | 920 | 127 | 216 | 46.77 | 15.5 | 9.1 | 2,017 | 992 | 179 | 254 | 50.82 | 11.3 | 7.9 |
Alabama | 108 | 1,874 | 878 | 140 | 200 | 46.85 | 13.4 | 9.4 | 2,077 | 1,095 | 134 | 244 | 47.28 | 15.5 | 8.5 |
Missouri | 110 | 2,061 | 864 | 132 | 253 | 41.92 | 15.6 | 8.1 | 2,372 | 1,224 | 164 | 231 | 48.40 | 14.5 | 10.3 |
Conference Average | 110 | 2,110 | 1,009 | 140 | 234 | 47.78 | 15.3 | 9.1 | 2,048 | 949 | 130 | 230 | 53.93 | 16.2 | 8.9 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
77.46 |
2021-10-08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
77.01 |
2021-11-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.48 |
2021-09-24 | Gainesville, Fla. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.19 |
2021-10-23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
74.69 |
2021-11-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
74.65 |
2021-10-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
74.18 |
2021-10-02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
74.12 |
2021-10-03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
73.77 |
2021-10-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
73.74 |
2021-10-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Bella Bell | Kentucky | A |
T'Ara Ceasar | Florida | A |
Danielle Mahaffey | Tennessee | A |
Lauren Myrick | Mississippi St. | A |
Alli Stumler | Kentucky | A |
Raigen Cianciulli | LSU | D |
Emma Grome | Kentucky | S |
Natalie Hayward | Tennessee | S |
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Whitney Foreman | LSU | A |
Sasha Ratliff | Ole Miss | A |
Breana Runnels | Tennessee | A |
Madi Skinner | Kentucky | A |
Gabby Waden | Mississippi St. | A |
Eleanor Beavin | Kentucky | D |
Kylee McLaughlin | Ole Miss | S |
Marlie Monserez | Florida | S |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee |
2 | Emma Grome | Kentucky |
3 | Marlie Monserez | Florida |
4 | Alli Stumler | Kentucky |
5 | Kylee McLaughlin | Ole Miss |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Alli Stumler | Kentucky |
2 | T'Ara Ceasar | Florida |
3 | Lauren Myrick | Mississippi St. |
4 | Breana Runnels | Tennessee |
5 | Madi Skinner | Kentucky |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee |
2 | Emma Grome | Kentucky |
3 | Marlie Monserez | Florida |
4 | Kylee McLaughlin | Ole Miss |
5 | Ella Larkin | LSU |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Raigen Cianciulli | LSU |
2 | Eleanor Beavin | Kentucky |
3 | Elli McKissock | Florida |
4 | Lilly Gunter | Mississippi St. |
5 | Bella Rosenthall | Auburn |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee | 22.8065 |
2 | Lauren Myrick | Mississippi St. | 21.9665 |
3 | Gracie Ryan | Arkansas | 21.9325 |
4 | Kylee McLaughlin | Ole Miss | 21.5963 |
5 | Gabby Waden | Mississippi St. | 21.2420 |
6 | Camille Conner | Texas A&M | 20.6269 |
7 | Ella Larkin | LSU | 20.2139 |
8 | Jillian Gillen | Arkansas | 18.7629 |
9 | Marlie Monserez | Florida | 18.6504 |
10 | Jackie Barrett | Auburn | 18.5301 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gabby Waden | Mississippi St. | 17.3905 |
2 | Camille Conner | Texas A&M | 13.1006 |
3 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee | 13.0326 |
4 | Kylee McLaughlin | Ole Miss | 12.2597 |
5 | Amber Stivrins | Georgia | 12.1134 |
6 | Marlie Monserez | Florida | 11.6605 |
7 | Anna Bair | Ole Miss | 11.6450 |
8 | Gracie Ryan | Arkansas | 11.0090 |
9 | Emma Grome | Kentucky | 10.9935 |
10 | Alli Stumler | Kentucky | 10.5596 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Raigen Cianciulli | LSU | 15.7611 |
2 | Lilly Gunter | Mississippi St. | 15.5185 |
3 | Bella Rosenthall | Auburn | 15.0576 |
4 | Courtney Jackson | Arkansas | 11.7102 |
5 | Lauren Myrick | Mississippi St. | 11.4529 |
6 | Gracie Ryan | Arkansas | 10.9235 |
7 | Emily Brown | Missouri | 10.5030 |
8 | Macy Carrabine | Texas A&M | 10.4944 |
9 | Elli McKissock | Florida | 10.1914 |
10 | Madison Bryant | Tennessee | 10.1897 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee | 0.2534 |
2 | Marlie Monserez | Florida | 0.2303 |
3 | Camille Conner | Texas A&M | 0.2292 |
4 | Kylee McLaughlin | Ole Miss | 0.2117 |
5 | Ella Larkin | LSU | 0.2042 |
6 | Breana Runnels | Tennessee | 0.2022 |
7 | Jackie Barrett | Auburn | 0.2014 |
8 | Gracie Ryan | Arkansas | 0.2012 |
9 | T'Ara Ceasar | Florida | 0.1988 |
10 | Lauren Myrick | Mississippi St. | 0.1979 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gabby Waden | Mississippi St. | 0.1474 |
2 | Camille Conner | Texas A&M | 0.1456 |
3 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee | 0.1448 |
4 | Marlie Monserez | Florida | 0.1440 |
5 | Emma Grome | Kentucky | 0.1235 |
6 | Amber Stivrins | Georgia | 0.1224 |
7 | Kylee McLaughlin | Ole Miss | 0.1202 |
8 | Alli Stumler | Kentucky | 0.1186 |
9 | Anna Bair | Ole Miss | 0.1164 |
10 | Breana Runnels | Tennessee | 0.1145 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bella Rosenthall | Auburn | 0.1585 |
2 | Raigen Cianciulli | LSU | 0.1515 |
3 | Lilly Gunter | Mississippi St. | 0.1349 |
4 | Macy Carrabine | Texas A&M | 0.1328 |
5 | Elli McKissock | Florida | 0.1258 |
6 | Emily Brown | Missouri | 0.1207 |
7 | Madison Bryant | Tennessee | 0.1145 |
8 | Morgan Carter | South Carolina | 0.1134 |
9 | Courtney Jackson | Arkansas | 0.1105 |
10 | Dru Kuck | Alabama | 0.1093 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.