Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,694.2539

Football georgia 11.9216
Men's Basketball arizona 10.5146
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.2365
Ice Hockey minnesota st 8.1338
Men's Soccer washington 9.3221
Women's Soccer florida st 10.8390
Men's Volleyball hawaii 9.0598
Women's Volleyball louisville 11.6893
Field Hockey iowa 10.0663

SEC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Kentucky 1,674.4071 1,678.1120 1,676.2585 59.07 63.23 0.271
2nd Florida 1,634.2763 1,638.0283 1,636.1512 55.05 62.56 0.261
3rd Tennessee 1,591.3137 1,599.8737 1,595.5880 54.62 62.43 0.213
4th Mississippi St. 1,554.7719 1,558.0458 1,556.4080 53.09 59.43 0.155
5th LSU 1,547.2764 1,548.7816 1,548.0289 52.43 57.29 0.164
6th Ole Miss 1,541.8508 1,548.0868 1,544.9657 52.74 58.84 0.150
7th Arkansas 1,541.2490 1,546.3086 1,543.7767 53.25 58.23 0.139
8th Georgia 1,518.4745 1,528.0389 1,523.2492 50.92 57.36 0.117
9th South Carolina 1,510.9291 1,524.7129 1,517.8053 51.19 61.38 0.138
10th Texas A&M 1,491.7589 1,503.5224 1,497.6291 52.50 54.79 0.105
11th Auburn 1,468.7707 1,482.7136 1,475.7257 54.12 53.97 0.089
12th Alabama 1,432.3636 1,443.3859 1,437.8642 51.21 50.48 0.013
13th Missouri 1,426.8661 1,434.3043 1,430.5804 47.26 52.36 0.041

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Kentucky 0.3723 48.12 10.89 43.53 39.66 3.71 7.35
2nd Florida 0.3580 46.74 10.94 43.56 40.08 3.90 7.15
3rd Tennessee 0.3325 44.68 11.43 40.67 43.27 4.29 5.57
4th South Carolina 0.3042 42.91 12.49 39.13 44.87 5.19 7.83
5th Ole Miss 0.2977 43.45 13.69 38.58 40.74 4.68 6.00
6th LSU 0.2971 41.98 12.28 37.70 45.00 4.28 6.98
7th Mississippi St. 0.2886 42.42 13.57 38.42 42.83 5.66 6.43
8th Georgia 0.2843 42.94 14.50 39.77 42.44 6.27 7.83
9th Arkansas 0.2742 40.54 13.11 37.32 45.47 6.13 8.17
10th Missouri 0.2494 38.86 13.92 35.79 47.87 5.50 6.78
11th Texas A&M 0.2493 39.23 14.30 35.77 46.86 5.01 6.43
12th Auburn 0.2262 34.59 11.97 31.23 53.92 3.96 4.96
13th Alabama 0.2093 36.85 15.92 33.29 47.65 6.22 6.45

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Florida 0.0966 27.66 18.00 25.52 55.67 8.53 4.73
2nd Kentucky 0.1012 28.67 18.56 26.28 54.36 8.03 3.23
3rd Tennessee 0.1190 29.66 17.76 27.46 54.93 8.93 3.93
4th LSU 0.1333 30.70 17.37 28.06 52.28 7.98 6.12
5th Mississippi St. 0.1335 30.57 17.22 28.74 53.24 6.50 4.88
6th Arkansas 0.1352 29.96 16.44 28.08 55.38 6.60 4.32
7th Auburn 0.1376 30.89 17.13 28.56 52.33 6.78 5.84
8th Texas A&M 0.1441 29.83 15.42 27.25 57.42 6.11 7.24
9th Ole Miss 0.1472 32.40 17.68 29.01 50.33 7.58 4.32
10th South Carolina 0.1667 34.59 17.92 32.54 47.89 8.07 4.77
11th Georgia 0.1673 34.15 17.42 31.68 49.49 7.59 5.30
12th Alabama 0.1965 34.80 15.15 32.30 50.06 5.79 5.00
13th Missouri 0.2080 36.34 15.54 32.63 49.05 6.82 6.41

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,537.2331 1,534.2902 1,533.6863 1,533.1233 1,534.5832
Difference -2.9430 -3.5469 -4.1099 -3.5332

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Kentucky 106 2,050 1,061 148 206 51.76 13.9 10.0 1,724 733 86 193 57.48 20.0 8.9
Tennessee 109 2,093 1,030 113 207 49.21 18.5 10.1 1,859 780 99 204 58.04 18.8 9.1
Florida 106 1,885 911 151 236 48.33 12.5 8.0 1,730 739 107 200 57.28 16.2 8.7
Auburn 103 2,044 1,072 101 200 52.45 20.2 10.2 1,951 929 134 208 52.38 14.6 9.4
Ole Miss 110 2,310 1,130 132 209 48.92 17.5 11.1 2,116 942 111 259 55.48 19.1 8.2
Mississippi St. 125 2,662 1,288 156 267 48.39 17.1 10.0 2,465 1,088 137 269 55.86 18.0 9.2
Arkansas 116 2,420 1,189 187 324 49.13 12.9 7.5 2,307 1,052 110 220 54.40 21.0 10.5
South Carolina 103 1,520 690 130 225 45.40 11.7 6.8 1,430 604 131 238 57.76 10.9 6.0
LSU 109 2,278 1,058 141 251 46.44 16.2 9.1 2,267 1,065 155 213 53.02 14.6 10.6
Georgia 114 2,264 1,032 167 247 45.58 13.6 9.2 2,315 1,092 142 260 52.83 16.3 8.9
Texas A&M 106 1,967 920 127 216 46.77 15.5 9.1 2,017 992 179 254 50.82 11.3 7.9
Alabama 108 1,874 878 140 200 46.85 13.4 9.4 2,077 1,095 134 244 47.28 15.5 8.5
Missouri 110 2,061 864 132 253 41.92 15.6 8.1 2,372 1,224 164 231 48.40 14.5 10.3
Conference Average 110 2,110 1,009 140 234 47.78 15.3 9.1 2,048 949 130 230 53.93 16.2 8.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SEC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

77.46

2021-10-08
Texas A&M
Georgia
3
2
20
25
25
21
29
27
21
25
17
15
GAME

77.01

2021-11-14
Mississippi St.
Tennessee
3
2
25
18
25
23
26
28
15
25
17
15
GAME

76.48

2021-09-24 Gainesville, Fla.
Florida
Mississippi St.
2
3
25
17
23
25
24
26
25
21
13
15
GAME

76.19

2021-10-23
Kentucky
Arkansas
3
2
25
19
21
25
22
25
25
16
16
14
GAME

74.69

2021-11-13
Mississippi St.
Tennessee
3
1
25
23
22
25
25
23
25
23
GAME

74.65

2021-10-10
LSU
Florida
3
1
22
25
25
17
25
21
25
21
GAME

74.18

2021-10-02
Mississippi St.
LSU
3
2
18
25
25
22
19
25
25
21
15
12
GAME

74.12

2021-10-03
Tennessee
Texas A&M
2
3
26
24
23
25
25
17
21
25
15
17
GAME

73.77

2021-10-13
Texas A&M
Ole Miss
2
3
18
25
27
29
25
16
26
24
13
15
GAME

73.74

2021-10-14
LSU
Kentucky
1
3
20
25
25
23
20
25
16
25

HuskerGeek SEC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.8065
2 21.9665
3 21.9325
4 21.5963
5 21.2420
6 20.6269
7 20.2139
8 18.7629
9 18.6504
10 18.5301

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.3905
2 13.1006
3 13.0326
4 12.2597
5 12.1134
6 11.6605
7 11.6450
8 11.0090
9 10.9935
10 10.5596

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.7611
2 15.5185
3 15.0576
4 11.7102
5 11.4529
6 10.9235
7 10.5030
8 10.4944
9 10.1914
10 10.1897

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2534
2 0.2303
3 0.2292
4 0.2117
5 0.2042
6 0.2022
7 0.2014
8 0.2012
9 0.1988
10 0.1979

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1474
2 0.1456
3 0.1448
4 0.1440
5 0.1235
6 0.1224
7 0.1202
8 0.1186
9 0.1164
10 0.1145

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1585
2 0.1515
3 0.1349
4 0.1328
5 0.1258
6 0.1207
7 0.1145
8 0.1134
9 0.1105
10 0.1093


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek