Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Kentucky | 1,654.1978 | 1,659.3128 | 1,656.7533 | 56.61 | 62.31 | 0.234 |
2nd | Florida | 1,643.2664 | 1,647.0064 | 1,645.1353 | 53.68 | 64.35 | 0.254 |
3rd | Arkansas | 1,634.8125 | 1,638.0654 | 1,636.4382 | 56.64 | 61.63 | 0.220 |
4th | Tennessee | 1,586.7277 | 1,585.5172 | 1,586.1223 | 53.47 | 57.42 | 0.147 |
5th | Georgia | 1,574.9441 | 1,575.1205 | 1,575.0323 | 53.49 | 57.30 | 0.155 |
6th | Mississippi St. | 1,562.0704 | 1,572.5040 | 1,567.2785 | 54.64 | 57.33 | 0.141 |
7th | LSU | 1,561.1732 | 1,569.3536 | 1,565.2580 | 52.10 | 59.57 | 0.154 |
8th | Texas A&M | 1,551.3611 | 1,557.8572 | 1,554.6058 | 51.40 | 58.56 | 0.145 |
9th | Ole Miss | 1,546.3278 | 1,550.4721 | 1,548.3986 | 50.65 | 58.17 | 0.130 |
10th | Auburn | 1,543.9260 | 1,546.5871 | 1,545.2560 | 53.59 | 56.52 | 0.121 |
11th | South Carolina | 1,533.6949 | 1,538.5747 | 1,536.1328 | 49.39 | 58.51 | 0.089 |
12th | Missouri | 1,495.7839 | 1,502.3458 | 1,499.0612 | 47.35 | 56.37 | 0.082 |
13th | Alabama | 1,494.8300 | 1,494.3319 | 1,494.5809 | 52.64 | 49.97 | 0.052 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Kentucky | 0.3617 | 47.39 | 11.21 | 43.72 | 37.96 | 5.02 | 8.80 |
2nd | Florida | 0.3381 | 48.13 | 14.32 | 44.60 | 36.64 | 5.99 | 8.21 |
3rd | Tennessee | 0.3222 | 44.32 | 12.10 | 39.93 | 40.91 | 3.84 | 7.58 |
4th | Arkansas | 0.3172 | 42.84 | 11.12 | 40.01 | 43.80 | 5.35 | 7.50 |
5th | Ole Miss | 0.3077 | 44.60 | 13.83 | 40.45 | 37.63 | 5.98 | 6.79 |
6th | Texas A&M | 0.2960 | 43.54 | 13.95 | 40.88 | 42.23 | 4.63 | 7.39 |
7th | Mississippi St. | 0.2833 | 41.25 | 12.92 | 38.34 | 45.31 | 4.75 | 5.68 |
8th | LSU | 0.2811 | 40.60 | 12.49 | 37.57 | 45.48 | 4.91 | 6.62 |
9th | Georgia | 0.2794 | 42.86 | 14.92 | 39.88 | 40.84 | 5.70 | 8.80 |
10th | Auburn | 0.2752 | 41.42 | 13.89 | 38.29 | 44.72 | 5.26 | 7.63 |
11th | Missouri | 0.2601 | 40.72 | 14.71 | 37.05 | 44.36 | 5.42 | 6.67 |
12th | South Carolina | 0.2420 | 40.11 | 15.91 | 37.59 | 44.66 | 6.95 | 7.68 |
13th | Alabama | 0.2137 | 37.34 | 15.97 | 34.25 | 47.68 | 6.17 | 9.96 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Florida | 0.0842 | 29.06 | 20.64 | 26.49 | 52.50 | 9.17 | 4.85 |
2nd | Arkansas | 0.0967 | 27.41 | 17.75 | 25.96 | 55.97 | 8.00 | 3.45 |
3rd | Georgia | 0.1243 | 31.88 | 19.45 | 29.75 | 50.94 | 8.97 | 3.57 |
4th | LSU | 0.1269 | 29.75 | 17.06 | 27.48 | 55.75 | 6.40 | 4.81 |
5th | Kentucky | 0.1281 | 29.96 | 17.15 | 27.20 | 53.96 | 8.59 | 3.47 |
6th | Mississippi St. | 0.1425 | 29.73 | 15.48 | 28.36 | 56.20 | 5.65 | 5.11 |
7th | Texas A&M | 0.1514 | 32.73 | 17.59 | 30.61 | 51.55 | 7.52 | 4.77 |
8th | South Carolina | 0.1535 | 33.21 | 17.86 | 31.47 | 50.67 | 8.37 | 5.01 |
9th | Auburn | 0.1539 | 33.27 | 17.87 | 30.53 | 50.44 | 7.91 | 5.74 |
10th | Alabama | 0.1621 | 32.33 | 16.12 | 29.78 | 53.15 | 7.08 | 6.01 |
11th | Tennessee | 0.1751 | 33.56 | 16.04 | 30.38 | 50.79 | 6.82 | 6.06 |
12th | Ole Miss | 0.1782 | 33.46 | 15.64 | 29.24 | 48.96 | 7.31 | 5.04 |
13th | Missouri | 0.1782 | 33.68 | 15.86 | 30.85 | 52.41 | 6.73 | 6.07 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,570.0041 | 1,568.9745 | 1,568.2803 | 1,563.1359 | 1,567.5987 |
Difference | -1.0296 | -1.7238 | -6.8682 | -3.2072 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Arkansas | 109 | 2,477 | 1,244 | 150 | 244 | 50.22 | 16.5 | 10.2 | 2,200 | 941 | 97 | 216 | 57.23 | 22.7 | 10.2 |
Florida | 113 | 2,539 | 1,196 | 179 | 276 | 47.11 | 14.2 | 9.2 | 2,250 | 904 | 129 | 247 | 59.82 | 17.4 | 9.1 |
Kentucky | 106 | 2,477 | 1,221 | 177 | 253 | 49.29 | 14.0 | 9.8 | 2,174 | 929 | 94 | 176 | 57.27 | 23.1 | 12.4 |
Auburn | 122 | 2,712 | 1,358 | 184 | 272 | 50.07 | 14.7 | 10.0 | 2,576 | 1,181 | 165 | 267 | 54.15 | 15.6 | 9.6 |
Georgia | 120 | 2,691 | 1,319 | 213 | 314 | 49.02 | 12.6 | 8.6 | 2,517 | 1,149 | 107 | 246 | 54.35 | 23.5 | 10.2 |
Mississippi St. | 108 | 2,341 | 1,130 | 99 | 196 | 48.27 | 23.6 | 11.9 | 2,286 | 1,061 | 135 | 244 | 53.59 | 16.9 | 9.4 |
Tennessee | 116 | 2,594 | 1,246 | 159 | 218 | 48.03 | 16.3 | 11.9 | 2,491 | 1,160 | 170 | 247 | 53.43 | 14.7 | 10.1 |
LSU | 119 | 2,578 | 1,178 | 131 | 231 | 45.69 | 19.7 | 11.2 | 2,555 | 1,142 | 142 | 241 | 55.30 | 18.0 | 10.6 |
Texas A&M | 110 | 2,221 | 994 | 142 | 278 | 44.76 | 15.6 | 8.0 | 2,240 | 1,024 | 137 | 278 | 54.29 | 16.4 | 8.1 |
South Carolina | 106 | 2,261 | 991 | 144 | 229 | 43.83 | 15.7 | 9.9 | 2,329 | 1,045 | 138 | 226 | 55.13 | 16.9 | 10.3 |
Ole Miss | 111 | 2,371 | 1,054 | 131 | 264 | 44.45 | 18.1 | 9.0 | 2,402 | 1,098 | 145 | 240 | 54.29 | 16.6 | 10.0 |
Missouri | 107 | 2,248 | 961 | 120 | 141 | 42.75 | 18.7 | 15.9 | 2,319 | 1,096 | 155 | 206 | 52.74 | 15.0 | 11.3 |
Alabama | 110 | 2,275 | 1,084 | 207 | 353 | 47.65 | 11.0 | 6.4 | 2,483 | 1,315 | 162 | 222 | 47.04 | 15.3 | 11.2 |
Conference Average | 112 | 2,445 | 1,152 | 157 | 251 | 47.01 | 16.2 | 10.1 | 2,371 | 1,080 | 137 | 235 | 54.51 | 17.8 | 10.2 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
78.43 |
2022-10-08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
77.79 |
2022-09-21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
77.73 |
2022-11-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
77.09 |
2022-10-08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
76.21 |
2022-10-08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.14 |
2022-10-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.75 |
2022-11-16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
75.32 |
2022-10-09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.05 |
2022-10-19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
74.86 |
2022-10-30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Morgahn Fingall | Tennessee | A |
Sasha Ratliff | Ole Miss | A |
Adanna Rollins | Kentucky | A |
Reagan Rutherford | Kentucky | A |
Azhani Taylor | Kentucky | A |
Eleanor Beavin | Kentucky | D |
Emma Grome | Kentucky | S |
Natalie Hayward | Tennessee | S |
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Merritt Beason | Florida | A |
Kaylee Cox | Missouri | A |
Sophie Fischer | Georgia | A |
Elise Goetzinger | Kentucky | A |
Taylor Head | Arkansas | A |
Emily Janek | Alabama | D |
Ella Larkin | LSU | D |
Elena Karakasi | Texas A&M | S |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Emma Grome | Kentucky |
2 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee |
3 | Reagan Rutherford | Kentucky |
4 | Adanna Rollins | Kentucky |
5 | Morgahn Fingall | Tennessee |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Reagan Rutherford | Kentucky |
2 | Adanna Rollins | Kentucky |
3 | Morgahn Fingall | Tennessee |
4 | Kaylee Cox | Missouri |
5 | Taylor Head | Arkansas |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Emma Grome | Kentucky |
2 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee |
3 | Elena Karakasi | Texas A&M |
4 | Alexis Stucky | Florida |
5 | Jackie Barrett | Auburn |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Eleanor Beavin | Kentucky |
2 | Ella Larkin | LSU |
3 | Elli McKissock | Florida |
4 | Courtney Jackson | Arkansas |
5 | Jenna Hampton | South Carolina |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee | 27.9648 |
2 | Kacie Evans | Georgia | 23.5385 |
3 | Kaylee Cox | Missouri | 23.2659 |
4 | Morgahn Fingall | Tennessee | 23.1903 |
5 | Emma Grome | Kentucky | 23.1771 |
6 | Elena Karakasi | Texas A&M | 21.9582 |
7 | Jackie Barrett | Auburn | 21.8633 |
8 | Reagan Rutherford | Kentucky | 20.8572 |
9 | Taylor Head | Arkansas | 20.7200 |
10 | Gabrielle Coulter | Mississippi St. | 20.6009 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee | 18.5241 |
2 | Emma Grome | Kentucky | 14.4837 |
3 | Kacie Evans | Georgia | 14.2785 |
4 | Morgahn Fingall | Tennessee | 14.2236 |
5 | Gabby Waden | Mississippi St. | 13.8649 |
6 | Reagan Rutherford | Kentucky | 13.6673 |
7 | Jackie Barrett | Auburn | 13.3223 |
8 | Elena Karakasi | Texas A&M | 12.9952 |
9 | Madison Scheer | Auburn | 12.6680 |
10 | Kaylee Cox | Missouri | 12.6503 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ella Larkin | LSU | 17.3272 |
2 | Jenna Hampton | South Carolina | 15.4380 |
3 | Sarah Morton | Auburn | 14.5955 |
4 | Bailey Cox | Georgia | 13.8299 |
5 | Cammy Niesen | Ole Miss | 13.4387 |
6 | Lilly Gunter | Mississippi St. | 13.3677 |
7 | Eleanor Beavin | Kentucky | 13.1782 |
8 | Elli McKissock | Florida | 12.4280 |
9 | Jill Bohnet | LSU | 11.6564 |
10 | Erykah Lovett | Tennessee | 10.7100 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Emily Janek | Alabama | 0.2456 |
2 | Elena Karakasi | Texas A&M | 0.2413 |
3 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee | 0.2411 |
4 | Kaylee Cox | Missouri | 0.2281 |
5 | Emma Grome | Kentucky | 0.2187 |
6 | Morgahn Fingall | Tennessee | 0.2108 |
7 | Jackie Barrett | Auburn | 0.2063 |
8 | Reagan Rutherford | Kentucky | 0.2045 |
9 | Kacie Evans | Georgia | 0.2012 |
10 | Logan Lednicky | Texas A&M | 0.1999 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Natalie Hayward | Tennessee | 0.1597 |
2 | Elena Karakasi | Texas A&M | 0.1428 |
3 | Emma Grome | Kentucky | 0.1366 |
4 | Reagan Rutherford | Kentucky | 0.1340 |
5 | Morgahn Fingall | Tennessee | 0.1293 |
6 | Gabby Waden | Mississippi St. | 0.1284 |
7 | Jackie Barrett | Auburn | 0.1257 |
8 | Kaylee Cox | Missouri | 0.1240 |
9 | Aly Borellis | Ole Miss | 0.1235 |
10 | Adanna Rollins | Kentucky | 0.1221 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jenna Hampton | South Carolina | 0.1456 |
2 | Ella Larkin | LSU | 0.1456 |
3 | Emily Janek | Alabama | 0.1315 |
4 | Lilly Gunter | Mississippi St. | 0.1249 |
5 | Cammy Niesen | Ole Miss | 0.1244 |
6 | Eleanor Beavin | Kentucky | 0.1243 |
7 | Sarah Morton | Auburn | 0.1227 |
8 | Bailey Cox | Georgia | 0.1152 |
9 | Lauren Hogan | Texas A&M | 0.1132 |
10 | Elli McKissock | Florida | 0.1130 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.