Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Spring Hill 1,457.1754 1,461.0548 1,459.1138 45.89 54.33 -0.017
2nd Kentucky St. 1,310.9945 1,320.9364 1,315.9561 39.30 45.95 -0.135
3rd Albany St. (GA) 1,222.9371 1,224.6371 1,223.7868 31.10 43.01 -0.232
4th Clark Atlanta 1,201.3949 1,210.9107 1,206.1434 30.38 42.77 -0.243
5th Tuskegee 1,196.2910 1,192.7149 1,194.5016 31.18 40.57 -0.251
6th Paine 1,141.5029 1,149.7855 1,145.6367 28.53 37.91 -0.305
7th Benedict 1,130.7783 1,142.1663 1,136.4580 28.63 37.56 -0.332
8th LeMoyne-Owen 1,123.4939 1,126.0060 1,124.7493 26.38 38.40 -0.335
9th Fort Valley St. 1,080.0116 1,106.2738 1,093.0638 26.81 36.06 -0.355
10th Lane 1,058.4191 1,086.7728 1,072.5023 24.75 34.22 -0.402
11th Central St. (OH) 1,059.1389 1,075.9270 1,067.4999 28.01 32.20 -0.394
12th Miles 1,034.4986 1,076.5929 1,055.3359 26.21 32.34 -0.401

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Spring Hill 0.2062 34.17 13.56 31.78 53.36 4.81 6.00
2nd Kentucky St. 0.0895 29.75 20.80 27.94 53.63 5.85 4.06
3rd Clark Atlanta 0.0617 28.85 22.69 27.07 55.78 6.13 3.55
4th Albany St. (GA) 0.0546 26.37 20.91 24.33 56.83 6.18 5.40
5th Tuskegee 0.0208 25.28 23.20 23.78 59.04 6.19 6.40
6th Paine 0.0139 22.13 20.75 19.96 63.88 5.92 2.66
7th LeMoyne-Owen 0.0015 21.36 21.21 19.68 63.72 5.99 1.46
8th Benedict -0.0190 19.36 21.25 17.02 67.74 5.44 2.48
9th Fort Valley St. -0.0376 18.57 22.33 18.11 66.70 7.42 1.21
10th Lane -0.0489 18.30 23.20 16.50 68.48 7.10 3.51
11th Central St. (OH) -0.0524 18.14 23.39 16.52 68.23 6.34 3.84
12th Miles -0.0658 17.51 24.09 14.83 69.40 7.55 3.08

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Spring Hill 0.2227 36.09 13.82 33.57 51.62 3.83 6.65
2nd Kentucky St. 0.2244 37.38 14.93 34.08 48.87 4.91 8.83
3rd Tuskegee 0.2721 40.87 13.67 37.98 43.39 2.93 9.57
4th Albany St. (GA) 0.2865 41.74 13.09 38.18 45.91 3.01 9.94
5th Clark Atlanta 0.3042 44.69 14.27 40.96 39.91 4.01 11.27
6th Benedict 0.3127 42.90 11.63 39.62 42.71 3.52 10.34
7th Fort Valley St. 0.3176 43.93 12.18 41.16 42.61 2.05 12.10
8th Paine 0.3185 45.15 13.30 41.12 39.70 5.49 11.76
9th Miles 0.3349 47.21 13.72 43.60 33.91 4.69 13.35
10th LeMoyne-Owen 0.3364 45.26 11.63 41.92 42.17 2.37 10.93
11th Central St. (OH) 0.3420 47.53 13.33 44.03 38.11 3.23 12.91
12th Lane 0.3530 47.16 11.85 43.14 41.00 1.40 11.59

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,174.5623 1,158.0298 1,149.6052 1,150.0921 1,158.0724
Difference -16.5325 -24.9571 -24.4702 -21.9866

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Spring Hill 110 2,462 1,388 222 117 56.38 11.1 21.0 1,854 752 101 153 59.44 18.4 12.1
Kentucky St. 135 2,695 1,314 191 179 48.76 14.1 15.1 2,729 1,351 216 211 50.50 12.6 12.9
Clark Atlanta 68 1,443 656 104 184 45.46 13.9 7.8 1,483 701 138 149 52.73 10.7 10.0
Albany St. (GA) 102 1,989 896 184 240 45.05 10.8 8.3 2,138 1,045 172 189 51.12 12.4 11.3
Paine 73 1,489 679 107 150 45.60 13.9 9.9 1,621 802 144 120 50.52 11.3 13.5
Benedict 80 1,641 747 115 116 45.52 14.3 14.1 1,776 890 138 162 49.89 12.9 11.0
Tuskegee 103 1,893 858 228 367 45.33 8.3 5.2 2,060 1,033 170 214 49.85 12.1 9.6
Fort Valley St. 52 1,012 451 58 61 44.57 17.4 16.6 1,119 567 105 101 49.33 10.7 11.1
Central St. (OH) 87 1,568 716 146 104 45.66 10.7 15.1 1,918 1,083 211 153 43.54 9.1 12.5
Miles 61 1,055 460 81 83 43.60 13.0 12.7 1,291 710 162 127 45.00 8.0 10.2
Lane 74 1,204 502 110 138 41.69 10.9 8.7 1,493 814 164 162 45.48 9.1 9.2
LeMoyne-Owen 96 1,625 654 85 122 40.25 19.1 13.3 2,079 1,118 201 203 46.22 10.3 10.2
Conference Average 87 1,673 777 136 155 45.66 13.1 12.3 1,797 906 160 162 49.47 11.5 11.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

64.02

2018-11-07 Birmimgham, Ala.
Kentucky St.
Spring Hill
1
3
25
23
19
25
17
25
12
25
GAME

60.05

2018-11-06 Birmingham, AL
Kentucky St.
Spring Hill
0
3
12
25
19
25
15
25
GAME

59.80

2018-11-06 Birmingham, Ala.
Albany St. (GA)
Kentucky St.
2
3
25
20
25
21
20
25
23
25
9
15
GAME

59.76

2018-10-12 Memphis, Tenn.
Kentucky St.
Spring Hill
0
3
17
25
15
25
23
25
GAME

59.00

2018-09-15 Wilberforce, Ohio
Kentucky St.
Spring Hill
0
3
7
25
20
25
19
25
GAME

57.72

2018-09-29 Albany, Ga.
Benedict
Spring Hill
0
3
11
25
14
25
25
27
GAME

57.40

2018-11-02 Augusta, GA
Albany St. (GA)
Paine
3
1
21
25
25
21
25
23
31
29
GAME

57.12

2018-08-31 Valdosta, GA
Albany St. (GA)
Spring Hill
0
3
9
25
16
25
18
25
GAME

56.76

2018-09-28 Albany, Ga.
Clark Atlanta
Spring Hill
0
3
12
25
12
25
21
25
GAME

56.69

2018-09-27 Albany, Ga.
Benedict
LeMoyne-Owen
3
2
18
25
17
25
27
25
25
22
15
8

HuskerGeek SIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 16.7686
2 16.2942
3 15.0707
4 14.5350
5 13.6140
6 13.3348
7 12.9817
8 12.0708
9 11.1867
10 9.8384

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.2248
2 10.1864
3 8.8434
4 7.6737
5 7.1046
6 6.3239
7 5.9240
8 5.8272
9 5.8249
10 5.7413

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 12.9115
2 12.1583
3 9.6640
4 9.2168
5 8.6882
6 8.0871
7 7.5678
8 7.5227
9 7.4483
10 7.1729

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1991
2 0.1938
3 0.1523
4 0.1449
5 0.1443
6 0.1408
7 0.1344
8 0.1340
9 0.1300
10 0.1295

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1211
2 0.1128
3 0.1049
4 0.1030
5 0.1009
6 0.0838
7 0.0673
8 0.0654
9 0.0637
10 0.0609

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1246
2 0.1207
3 0.1177
4 0.1081
5 0.1039
6 0.1024
7 0.0971
8 0.0944
9 0.0944
10 0.0919


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek