Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Spring Hill 1,522.1134 1,490.0156 1,505.9790 51.77 57.09 0.020
2nd Kentucky St. 1,344.3756 1,306.1676 1,325.1339 44.27 46.87 -0.132
3rd Albany St. (GA) 1,289.6447 1,250.8424 1,270.0953 40.91 44.84 -0.174
4th Benedict 1,231.5186 1,192.4714 1,211.8377 40.26 38.54 -0.239
5th Central St. (OH) 1,218.6223 1,184.8861 1,201.6358 36.57 39.52 -0.259
6th Lane 1,216.0920 1,179.9756 1,197.8977 32.50 43.68 -0.272
7th LeMoyne-Owen 1,205.1377 1,167.8164 1,186.3303 35.55 39.70 -0.283
8th Paine 1,197.6459 1,168.3469 1,182.9057 36.36 41.37 -0.233
9th Clark Atlanta 1,165.2223 1,131.5380 1,148.2567 34.87 36.90 -0.328
10th Tuskegee 1,159.9510 1,128.2256 1,143.9783 32.47 39.66 -0.333
11th Savannah St. 1,150.0635 1,110.5444 1,130.1312 34.55 37.50 -0.289
12th Fort Valley St. 1,117.6856 1,081.1872 1,099.2849 30.89 36.31 -0.367
13th Miles 1,067.5209 1,031.8400 1,049.5288 30.60 33.98 -0.373

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Spring Hill 0.2051 33.64 13.13 31.01 53.38 4.70 6.54
2nd Kentucky St. 0.1323 30.39 17.16 27.91 53.58 4.46 5.33
3rd Albany St. (GA) 0.0852 26.49 17.97 24.61 58.50 5.05 5.83
4th Benedict 0.0793 26.67 18.74 23.36 60.05 5.31 2.60
5th Paine 0.0607 25.57 19.49 24.21 58.63 5.04 4.05
6th Lane 0.0562 24.90 19.29 22.42 60.46 5.57 3.40
7th Savannah St. 0.0458 26.55 21.97 24.33 55.77 6.24 5.24
8th LeMoyne-Owen 0.0230 22.08 19.78 19.67 61.77 5.34 2.37
9th Central St. (OH) 0.0203 23.43 21.40 21.30 62.20 6.56 4.03
10th Tuskegee 0.0030 24.50 24.20 22.72 58.18 5.36 3.98
11th Clark Atlanta -0.0194 21.95 23.89 20.57 61.54 6.23 6.66
12th Fort Valley St. -0.0226 18.28 20.54 16.89 68.07 5.35 2.39
13th Miles -0.0471 17.03 21.75 13.63 67.24 5.11 2.86

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Spring Hill 0.1852 33.34 14.82 31.13 52.09 4.77 7.33
2nd Albany St. (GA) 0.2595 38.89 12.95 35.82 48.37 3.08 9.38
3rd Kentucky St. 0.2638 39.36 12.97 36.89 43.78 5.25 9.69
4th Central St. (OH) 0.2796 42.66 14.70 40.12 42.25 4.52 12.37
5th Paine 0.2935 44.82 15.47 41.00 37.53 5.13 12.08
6th LeMoyne-Owen 0.3058 43.68 13.10 40.89 43.16 3.26 10.88
7th Clark Atlanta 0.3089 44.68 13.79 40.77 41.78 3.54 12.67
8th Benedict 0.3180 44.38 12.58 40.28 40.40 4.27 11.81
9th Miles 0.3261 45.89 13.27 41.06 39.61 3.15 13.59
10th Lane 0.3286 44.94 12.07 41.56 40.93 3.78 10.57
11th Savannah St. 0.3350 45.85 12.35 42.44 39.77 4.25 12.66
12th Tuskegee 0.3358 44.42 10.84 41.02 42.27 2.75 11.63
13th Fort Valley St. 0.3445 46.62 12.18 43.43 40.50 3.38 13.40

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,204.0766 1,190.6807 1,185.8965 1,181.8346 1,190.6221
Difference -13.3959 -18.1800 -22.2420 -17.9393

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Spring Hill 100 2,315 1,367 204 97 59.05 11.3 23.9 1,640 658 92 158 59.88 17.8 10.4
Kentucky St. 92 1,938 1,048 176 112 54.08 11.0 17.3 1,729 826 157 171 52.23 11.0 10.1
Benedict 92 1,709 900 145 107 52.66 11.8 16.0 1,670 848 170 167 49.22 9.8 10.0
Albany St. (GA) 96 1,727 872 180 177 50.49 9.6 9.8 1,710 833 150 167 51.29 11.4 10.2
Tuskegee 86 1,807 918 132 178 50.80 13.7 10.2 1,834 942 165 142 48.64 11.1 12.9
Lane 79 1,494 671 135 151 44.91 11.1 9.9 1,559 733 130 132 52.98 12.0 11.8
Paine 87 1,748 831 136 162 47.54 12.9 10.8 1,873 947 185 159 49.44 10.1 11.8
LeMoyne-Owen 81 1,444 669 92 114 46.33 15.7 12.7 1,660 876 151 154 47.23 11.0 10.8
Clark Atlanta 78 1,572 729 168 196 46.37 9.4 8.0 1,757 940 170 177 46.50 10.3 9.9
Savannah St. 71 1,350 627 128 174 46.44 10.5 7.8 1,535 824 166 116 46.32 9.2 13.2
Central St. (OH) 100 1,863 872 149 137 46.81 12.5 13.6 2,145 1,169 213 198 45.50 10.1 10.8
Fort Valley St. 60 1,052 454 77 76 43.16 13.7 13.8 1,258 671 143 123 46.66 8.8 10.2
Miles 59 983 413 74 110 42.01 13.3 8.9 1,257 711 148 94 43.44 8.5 13.4
Conference Average 83 1,616 798 138 138 48.51 12.0 12.5 1,664 844 157 151 49.18 10.9 11.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

63.10

2019-10-11 Jackson, Tenn.
Kentucky St.
Spring Hill
0
3
17
25
22
25
15
25
GAME

61.32

2019-09-12 Frankfort, Kentucky
Kentucky St.
Spring Hill
1
3
13
25
25
23
10
25
20
25
GAME

61.11

2019-09-27 Albany, GA
Albany St. (GA)
Spring Hill
0
3
19
25
11
25
14
25
GAME

60.44

2019-09-26 Albany, GA
Albany St. (GA)
Kentucky St.
0
3
20
25
23
25
25
27
GAME

60.42

2019-09-26 Albany, GA
Benedict
Kentucky St.
1
3
27
25
17
25
28
30
17
25
GAME

58.56

2019-10-12 Jackson, TN
Lane
Spring Hill
0
3
16
25
15
25
10
25
GAME

57.36

2019-10-01 Savannah, Ga.
Savannah St.
Albany St. (GA)
1
3
25
22
16
25
24
26
25
27
GAME

56.92

2019-09-26 Albany, GA
Spring Hill
Paine
3
0
25
16
25
16
25
15
GAME

56.90

2019-09-13 Frankfort, Kentucky
Lane
Central St. (OH)
3
1
25
19
21
25
31
29
25
23
GAME

56.87

2019-09-14 Frankfort, Kentucky
Central St. (OH)
Spring Hill
0
3
11
25
15
25
16
25

HuskerGeek SIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 16.5932
2 12.8761
3 12.7255
4 12.0106
5 11.9058
6 11.4908
7 11.1739
8 10.8126
9 10.7839
10 10.7523

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.4354
2 8.1255
3 7.4531
4 7.0678
5 7.0557
6 6.7596
7 6.5199
8 6.5099
9 5.9097
10 5.7707

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.2112
2 8.8582
3 8.7621
4 8.6159
5 7.9158
6 7.1578
7 7.0949
8 6.9251
9 6.7771
10 6.7076

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1999
2 0.1922
3 0.1665
4 0.1520
5 0.1495
6 0.1483
7 0.1434
8 0.1424
9 0.1383
10 0.1342

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1137
2 0.1009
3 0.0909
4 0.0905
5 0.0855
6 0.0821
7 0.0781
8 0.0775
9 0.0767
10 0.0748

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1181
2 0.1132
3 0.1056
4 0.1026
5 0.1015
6 0.1005
7 0.0935
8 0.0926
9 0.0913
10 0.0862


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek