Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SWAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Alabama St. 1,368.6443 1,352.1130 1,360.3535 37.66 48.72 -0.133
2nd Alabama A&M 1,349.8377 1,334.6658 1,342.2303 35.37 49.57 -0.134
3rd Southern U. 1,289.6995 1,272.4092 1,281.0252 32.48 45.83 -0.218
4th Jackson St. 1,265.8720 1,249.6895 1,257.7548 32.74 44.76 -0.228
5th Texas Southern 1,250.7167 1,233.3791 1,242.0177 30.54 45.04 -0.246
6th Prairie View 1,219.6825 1,206.8393 1,213.2439 28.18 44.20 -0.284
7th Ark.-Pine Bluff 1,217.4154 1,202.8165 1,210.0939 28.73 43.15 -0.271
8th Alcorn 1,214.8482 1,195.0379 1,204.9023 30.33 40.97 -0.297
9th Grambling 1,210.1758 1,193.8212 1,201.9707 30.49 41.71 -0.275
10th Mississippi Val. 1,144.5414 1,125.5582 1,135.0101 27.80 37.00 -0.357

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Alabama A&M 0.1579 32.74 16.95 30.76 53.25 6.16 3.89
2nd Alabama St. 0.1193 32.26 20.32 29.83 51.19 5.90 5.01
3rd Southern U. 0.0701 26.60 19.59 24.61 57.13 6.73 4.30
4th Texas Southern 0.0701 27.73 20.72 26.18 56.49 5.97 3.69
5th Jackson St. 0.0632 28.35 22.03 26.44 52.35 9.05 3.80
6th Ark.-Pine Bluff 0.0560 23.54 17.94 22.04 63.13 5.86 3.98
7th Grambling 0.0548 26.19 20.71 24.93 57.54 7.15 2.77
8th Prairie View 0.0430 25.75 21.45 23.88 58.17 6.72 2.24
9th Alcorn 0.0367 25.24 21.57 23.52 57.57 7.55 6.59
10th Mississippi Val. -0.0276 20.50 23.25 19.46 64.50 7.28 4.63

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Alabama St. 0.2521 39.85 14.64 37.15 44.97 5.37 9.98
2nd Southern U. 0.2883 41.71 12.88 38.79 43.24 5.14 8.79
3rd Jackson St. 0.2914 42.59 13.45 38.39 41.69 4.94 8.09
4th Alabama A&M 0.2920 42.60 13.40 39.45 44.49 4.53 9.69
5th Texas Southern 0.3158 44.10 12.52 41.12 41.19 4.80 8.57
6th Prairie View 0.3272 44.52 11.79 41.84 41.97 3.74 7.90
7th Ark.-Pine Bluff 0.3273 44.76 12.03 41.07 41.06 4.40 9.82
8th Mississippi Val. 0.3296 43.90 10.94 40.11 44.34 1.84 8.68
9th Grambling 0.3297 44.97 12.00 42.15 39.72 4.67 8.56
10th Alcorn 0.3340 45.60 12.19 41.99 40.67 3.25 8.80

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,244.8603 1,244.1549 1,234.8396 1,230.7776 1,238.6581
Difference -0.7054 -10.0206 -14.0827 -8.2696

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Alabama A&M 129 2,703 1,240 173 163 45.88 15.6 16.6 2,624 1,162 239 237 55.72 11.0 11.1
Alabama St. 142 3,015 1,416 210 250 46.97 14.4 12.1 2,980 1,385 271 258 53.52 11.0 11.6
Southern U. 107 2,271 1,009 154 191 44.43 14.7 11.9 2,324 1,068 173 222 54.05 13.4 10.5
Jackson St. 130 2,645 1,143 159 177 43.21 16.6 14.9 2,888 1,396 202 247 51.66 14.3 11.7
Texas Southern 117 2,359 981 143 209 41.59 16.5 11.3 2,637 1,274 196 223 51.69 13.5 11.8
Alcorn 96 1,906 823 179 212 43.18 10.6 9.0 2,144 1,082 153 182 49.53 14.0 11.8
Prairie View 108 2,117 834 97 134 39.40 21.8 15.8 2,476 1,211 173 199 51.09 14.3 12.4
Grambling 117 2,226 923 113 141 41.47 19.7 15.8 2,642 1,363 198 183 48.41 13.3 14.4
Ark.-Pine Bluff 93 1,768 701 110 205 39.65 16.1 8.6 2,142 1,094 187 145 48.93 11.5 14.8
Mississippi Val. 98 1,664 641 115 158 38.52 14.5 10.5 2,281 1,284 171 164 43.71 13.3 13.9
Conference Average 114 2,267 971 145 184 42.43 16.1 12.6 2,514 1,232 196 206 50.83 13.0 12.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SWAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

65.90

2018-10-04 Montgomery, Alabama
Alabama St.
Alabama A&M
1
3
23
25
28
30
25
21
20
25
GAME

64.71

2018-09-23 Baton Rouge, La.
Alcorn
Southern U.
3
2
17
25
29
27
27
29
25
23
15
9
GAME

61.28

2018-10-21 Huntsville, Ala.
Alabama St.
Texas Southern
3
1
34
32
22
25
26
24
25
9
GAME

61.08

2018-09-21 Baton Rouge, La
Alabama St.
Grambling
2
3
25
14
25
23
24
26
19
25
10
15
GAME

60.88

2018-11-04 Jackson, MS
Jackson St.
Alabama A&M
1
3
26
24
22
25
16
25
22
25
GAME

60.63

2018-11-01 Huntsville, AL
Alabama A&M
Alabama St.
2
3
19
25
17
25
27
25
25
23
8
15
GAME

60.48

2018-10-07 Huntsville, Ala.
Alabama A&M
Jackson St.
3
1
25
22
25
20
24
26
26
24
GAME

59.90

2018-11-18 Itta Bena, Miss.
Alabama A&M
Alabama St.
1
3
13
25
15
25
25
22
19
25
GAME

59.05

2018-11-16 Itta Bena, Miss.
Grambling
Southern U.
1
3
18
25
27
25
23
25
23
25
GAME

59.04

2018-10-08 Pine Bluff, Arkansas
Ark.-Pine Bluff
Prairie View
3
0
26
24
25
17
25
22

HuskerGeek SWAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.2422
2 18.2211
3 17.1630
4 16.0755
5 13.9873
6 13.3091
7 13.1027
8 12.3826
9 11.9531
10 11.9177

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.8532
2 12.9510
3 9.6190
4 8.3920
5 8.1970
6 7.7609
7 7.6873
8 7.6812
9 7.3302
10 6.8953

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 12.3717
2 12.2604
3 11.3266
4 9.6089
5 9.4248
6 8.9975
7 8.9483
8 8.5551
9 8.4080
10 8.4023

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1684
2 0.1557
3 0.1504
4 0.1395
5 0.1318
6 0.1258
7 0.1245
8 0.1230
9 0.1193
10 0.1177

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1107
2 0.1076
3 0.0902
4 0.0873
5 0.0782
6 0.0701
7 0.0660
8 0.0657
9 0.0644
10 0.0636

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1097
2 0.1059
3 0.1011
4 0.0977
5 0.0944
6 0.0943
7 0.0933
8 0.0928
9 0.0923
10 0.0850


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek