Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SWAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Florida A&M 1,356.5433 1,364.3766 1,360.4543 46.46 48.23 -0.063
2nd Jackson St. 1,320.5100 1,322.4108 1,321.4600 44.58 44.48 -0.104
3rd Ark.-Pine Bluff 1,301.8593 1,298.6876 1,300.2725 44.49 40.36 -0.154
4th Alabama St. 1,286.4606 1,280.9602 1,283.7074 44.11 41.09 -0.142
5th Texas Southern 1,179.4047 1,184.0707 1,181.7354 44.16 36.81 -0.251
6th Grambling 1,172.9216 1,176.1461 1,174.5327 42.80 35.28 -0.273
7th Southern U. 1,165.2485 1,164.6260 1,164.9372 40.00 39.07 -0.275
8th Prairie View 1,159.1612 1,159.2571 1,159.2091 40.57 35.21 -0.297
9th Bethune-Cookman 1,132.8481 1,135.6258 1,134.2361 38.45 37.20 -0.289
10th Alcorn 1,110.3594 1,116.3269 1,113.3392 39.47 34.06 -0.332
11th Alabama A&M 1,093.5329 1,100.2527 1,096.8877 41.95 33.43 -0.347
12th Mississippi Val. 1,000.9469 1,001.3290 1,001.1379 35.95 32.36 -0.406

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Florida A&M 0.2041 36.59 16.19 33.27 48.88 6.71 6.52
2nd Jackson St. 0.1505 32.19 17.15 29.64 52.65 6.04 6.90
3rd Alabama St. 0.1459 33.76 19.17 30.77 51.25 5.68 5.96
4th Ark.-Pine Bluff 0.0994 27.51 17.58 25.45 57.65 6.37 4.58
5th Southern U. 0.0707 23.76 16.69 22.14 59.96 7.22 3.60
6th Texas Southern 0.0532 23.56 18.24 21.47 59.77 6.18 4.85
7th Prairie View 0.0478 23.90 19.11 21.55 58.84 6.84 4.28
8th Bethune-Cookman 0.0341 23.08 19.68 20.13 63.58 6.14 3.32
9th Grambling 0.0230 22.79 20.49 20.23 61.89 7.00 3.40
10th Alcorn 0.0019 22.98 22.80 20.92 59.90 7.27 3.12
11th Alabama A&M -0.0034 23.00 23.34 20.39 61.55 7.93 4.08
12th Mississippi Val. -0.0289 17.24 20.13 15.67 70.06 6.31 3.49

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Ark.-Pine Bluff 0.2533 38.44 13.11 35.39 48.80 5.17 8.83
2nd Jackson St. 0.2549 38.27 12.78 34.94 48.01 4.54 8.16
3rd Florida A&M 0.2674 39.13 12.39 35.44 47.91 3.93 6.84
4th Alabama St. 0.2876 42.76 14.00 37.93 42.30 5.24 9.19
5th Grambling 0.2957 41.56 11.99 36.90 41.57 3.82 8.67
6th Texas Southern 0.3046 40.69 10.23 36.99 43.04 2.24 9.09
7th Bethune-Cookman 0.3229 46.70 14.40 41.85 36.86 5.78 11.07
8th Alcorn 0.3343 44.38 10.96 40.51 42.29 2.80 10.31
9th Alabama A&M 0.3435 47.33 12.98 41.65 36.29 3.83 12.29
10th Prairie View 0.3447 44.94 10.47 40.44 36.55 3.27 9.58
11th Southern U. 0.3454 44.16 9.62 40.23 40.49 3.41 10.35
12th Mississippi Val. 0.3774 48.39 10.65 43.08 35.58 2.76 12.65

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,190.9925 1,193.0317 1,188.9962 1,183.0597 1,189.0200
Difference 2.0393 -1.9963 -7.9328 -2.6299

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Florida A&M 113 2,102 1,169 218 168 55.61 9.6 12.5 1,804 877 152 178 51.39 11.9 10.1
Jackson St. 110 2,145 1,144 219 233 53.33 9.8 9.2 2,054 1,073 165 203 47.76 12.4 10.1
Ark.-Pine Bluff 112 2,281 1,249 178 191 54.76 12.8 11.9 2,213 1,230 180 195 44.42 12.3 11.3
Southern U. 86 1,615 850 113 120 52.63 14.3 13.5 1,789 995 174 122 44.38 10.3 14.7
Alabama St. 126 2,390 1,236 215 227 51.72 11.1 10.5 2,488 1,389 230 222 44.17 10.8 11.2
Texas Southern 108 1,971 1,056 148 158 53.58 13.3 12.5 2,302 1,355 194 197 41.14 11.9 11.7
Grambling 98 1,807 980 116 132 54.23 15.6 13.7 2,011 1,204 154 161 40.13 13.1 12.5
Prairie View 107 1,919 974 132 140 50.76 14.5 13.7 2,357 1,431 215 219 39.29 11.0 10.8
Alcorn 87 1,500 766 95 138 51.07 15.8 10.9 1,868 1,144 182 168 38.76 10.3 11.1
Bethune-Cookman 90 1,479 710 99 110 48.01 14.9 13.4 1,892 1,117 214 179 40.96 8.8 10.6
Alabama A&M 94 1,116 565 114 137 50.63 9.8 8.1 1,514 952 250 203 37.12 6.1 7.5
Mississippi Val. 68 869 406 75 114 46.72 11.6 7.6 1,365 861 194 123 36.92 7.0 11.1
Conference Average 100 1,766 925 144 156 51.92 12.8 11.5 1,971 1,136 192 181 42.20 10.5 11.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SWAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.03

2021-11-20 Huntsville, AL
Florida A&M
Ark.-Pine Bluff
3
2
21
25
25
22
25
23
27
29
15
8
GAME

66.18

2021-11-14
Alabama St.
Florida A&M
2
3
22
25
25
20
10
25
29
27
19
21
GAME

63.04

2021-11-20 Huntsville, AL
Jackson St.
Alabama St.
3
2
21
25
25
20
25
18
20
25
15
13
GAME

61.48

2021-10-25
Florida A&M
Jackson St.
3
0
25
22
26
24
25
22
GAME

60.48

2021-10-24
Bethune-Cookman
Jackson St.
1
3
19
25
14
25
25
12
10
25
GAME

60.29

2021-11-01 Baton Rouge, LA
Alabama A&M
Prairie View
3
1
20
25
26
24
30
28
25
18
GAME

60.27

2021-10-17
Florida A&M
Alabama St.
2
3
27
25
25
14
17
25
25
27
10
15
GAME

59.80

2021-10-03
Ark.-Pine Bluff
Southern U.
3
1
25
15
25
23
30
32
25
15
GAME

59.69

2021-10-30 Grambling, LA
Florida A&M
Texas Southern
3
2
20
25
25
27
25
17
25
16
17
15
GAME

59.52

2021-10-10 Tallahassee, FL
Bethune-Cookman
Southern U.
3
1
26
24
13
25
25
22
25
23

HuskerGeek SWAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.6962
2 19.8931
3 15.9245
4 15.4202
5 15.3803
6 15.3327
7 14.1753
8 13.6904
9 13.0341
10 12.9486

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.5951
2 12.8766
3 7.4519
4 7.4279
5 6.8031
6 6.7195
7 6.5600
8 6.2066
9 6.1533
10 6.0748

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.9098
2 14.6858
3 11.1856
4 10.7347
5 10.1011
6 9.9320
7 9.2093
8 8.7928
9 8.7007
10 7.9283

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2548
2 0.2139
3 0.1761
4 0.1659
5 0.1631
6 0.1593
7 0.1577
8 0.1493
9 0.1456
10 0.1440

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1462
2 0.1385
3 0.0972
4 0.0830
5 0.0762
6 0.0750
7 0.0741
8 0.0723
9 0.0660
10 0.0655

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1693
2 0.1512
3 0.1454
4 0.1325
5 0.1086
6 0.1075
7 0.1068
8 0.1038
9 0.1035
10 0.0940


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek