Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SWAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Florida A&M 1,413.1822 1,417.7266 1,415.4526 48.68 49.22 -0.048
2nd Alabama St. 1,369.8953 1,370.9059 1,370.4005 45.51 45.51 -0.088
3rd Jackson St. 1,325.3493 1,333.0439 1,329.1910 43.82 45.92 -0.122
4th Grambling 1,292.9803 1,300.1527 1,296.5616 44.40 43.24 -0.161
5th Ark.-Pine Bluff 1,258.9292 1,268.0208 1,263.4668 41.40 40.13 -0.215
6th Bethune-Cookman 1,257.3250 1,257.3366 1,257.3308 42.16 40.40 -0.199
7th Texas Southern 1,208.1295 1,212.1783 1,210.1522 45.91 36.90 -0.262
8th Prairie View 1,196.6596 1,208.5676 1,202.5989 40.21 38.64 -0.236
9th Alabama A&M 1,199.1685 1,201.8329 1,200.5000 40.31 38.14 -0.278
10th Southern U. 1,162.9787 1,175.7755 1,169.3596 42.08 34.99 -0.274
11th Alcorn 1,137.1434 1,143.5369 1,140.3357 37.33 38.20 -0.332
12th Mississippi Val. 948.8168 962.6989 955.7327 38.18 26.60 -0.517

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Florida A&M 0.1859 35.58 16.99 33.09 51.48 6.65 6.12
2nd Alabama St. 0.1656 34.53 17.98 31.95 49.63 5.70 6.44
3rd Jackson St. 0.1587 33.77 17.89 31.85 50.78 6.89 4.48
4th Bethune-Cookman 0.0929 28.30 19.01 25.94 57.90 6.62 4.10
5th Grambling 0.0924 27.27 18.02 25.13 58.39 6.35 5.54
6th Ark.-Pine Bluff 0.0835 27.09 18.74 24.83 54.51 5.71 5.09
7th Prairie View 0.0684 27.42 20.58 25.51 55.73 6.86 4.22
8th Alabama A&M 0.0611 26.99 20.88 25.04 57.35 6.40 5.02
9th Texas Southern 0.0420 22.66 18.47 20.44 60.57 7.39 6.05
10th Southern U. 0.0298 24.17 21.19 21.68 57.67 7.01 4.15
11th Alcorn 0.0280 24.58 21.77 22.82 60.88 6.69 6.14
12th Mississippi Val. -0.1079 13.85 24.64 12.33 73.73 5.79 4.62

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Florida A&M 0.2338 37.70 14.32 35.38 50.06 5.16 7.30
2nd Grambling 0.2537 38.30 12.93 35.15 47.59 4.77 6.88
3rd Alabama St. 0.2539 39.92 14.52 36.34 44.32 6.17 6.56
4th Jackson St. 0.2808 40.85 12.77 37.84 44.40 4.32 8.12
5th Bethune-Cookman 0.2920 43.37 14.17 40.59 40.16 6.59 9.50
6th Ark.-Pine Bluff 0.2987 42.17 12.30 37.97 41.63 4.49 7.99
7th Southern U. 0.3042 44.45 14.03 39.95 37.26 5.90 10.57
8th Texas Southern 0.3042 42.54 12.12 37.95 40.10 3.75 9.88
9th Prairie View 0.3044 41.39 10.94 37.55 42.91 3.79 9.78
10th Alabama A&M 0.3391 46.68 12.77 43.41 39.94 4.29 12.12
11th Alcorn 0.3596 47.94 11.98 43.60 37.45 3.66 11.72
12th Mississippi Val. 0.4091 51.41 10.50 46.52 33.75 1.62 14.88

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,234.2569 1,243.9897 1,241.1451 1,238.4350 1,239.4567
Difference 9.7328 6.8883 4.1782 6.9331

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Florida A&M 121 2,599 1,440 208 211 55.41 12.5 12.3 2,301 1,116 171 204 51.50 13.5 11.3
Grambling 98 2,115 1,138 164 188 53.81 12.9 11.3 2,046 1,070 121 152 47.70 16.9 13.5
Jackson St. 99 2,064 1,065 145 160 51.60 14.2 12.9 2,015 1,028 159 153 48.98 12.7 13.2
Alabama St. 124 2,690 1,413 230 247 52.53 11.7 10.9 2,522 1,313 149 264 47.94 16.9 9.6
Texas Southern 101 1,917 1,056 156 140 55.09 12.3 13.7 2,210 1,297 190 170 41.31 11.6 13.0
Ark.-Pine Bluff 112 2,309 1,188 174 233 51.45 13.3 9.9 2,443 1,345 166 204 44.95 14.7 12.0
Bethune-Cookman 108 2,008 1,011 129 187 50.35 15.6 10.7 2,261 1,270 199 213 43.83 11.4 10.6
Prairie View 113 2,174 1,055 132 200 48.53 16.5 10.9 2,565 1,480 230 206 42.30 11.2 12.5
Southern U. 101 1,867 950 113 156 50.88 16.5 12.0 2,274 1,378 227 198 39.40 10.0 11.5
Alcorn 98 1,790 853 151 204 47.65 11.9 8.8 2,279 1,309 240 224 42.56 9.5 10.2
Alabama A&M 111 1,954 944 142 158 48.31 13.8 12.4 2,364 1,377 282 236 41.75 8.4 10.0
Mississippi Val. 76 967 471 79 133 48.71 12.2 7.3 1,769 1,205 243 147 31.88 7.3 12.0
Conference Average 105 2,038 1,049 152 185 51.19 13.6 11.1 2,254 1,266 198 198 43.68 12.0 11.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SWAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

69.18

2022-11-06
Florida A&M
Alabama St.
1
3
23
25
25
17
28
30
23
25
GAME

67.14

2022-11-10
Grambling
Ark.-Pine Bluff
3
1
24
26
28
26
25
23
25
23
GAME

65.35

2022-10-30 Prairie View, TX
Grambling
Alabama St.
2
3
25
23
23
25
29
27
16
25
14
16
GAME

65.09

2022-10-02
Alabama St.
Florida A&M
2
3
25
18
25
22
23
25
20
25
11
15
GAME

64.72

2022-10-14
Jackson St.
Florida A&M
1
3
26
24
15
25
21
25
19
25
GAME

63.06

2022-11-12
Florida A&M
Jackson St.
3
1
16
25
25
10
25
20
25
23
GAME

62.90

2022-11-18 Houston, TX
Grambling
Bethune-Cookman
2
3
25
15
19
25
25
23
23
25
10
15
GAME

62.74

2022-11-20 Houston, TX
Alabama St.
Florida A&M
0
3
22
25
19
25
24
26
GAME

61.81

2022-10-31 Prairie View, TX
Bethune-Cookman
Grambling
2
3
17
25
25
22
12
25
25
16
13
15
GAME

61.34

2022-11-07
Prairie View
Ark.-Pine Bluff
2
3
25
22
23
25
23
25
25
21
9
15

HuskerGeek SWAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.6161
2 18.9496
3 17.5342
4 17.2472
5 17.1823
6 15.7147
7 14.9273
8 14.2415
9 14.0897
10 13.7509

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.5952
2 11.8170
3 10.3850
4 9.6176
5 8.7933
6 8.1561
7 7.3724
8 7.0571
9 6.7549
10 6.7545

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.0474
2 13.7015
3 10.4909
4 10.1711
5 10.0209
6 9.3147
7 8.9104
8 8.8429
9 8.7409
10 8.5646

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2060
2 0.2019
3 0.1888
4 0.1865
5 0.1526
6 0.1511
7 0.1432
8 0.1397
9 0.1345
10 0.1250

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1299
2 0.1129
3 0.1125
4 0.0935
5 0.0824
6 0.0784
7 0.0782
8 0.0720
9 0.0704
10 0.0668

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1420
2 0.1249
3 0.1143
4 0.1114
5 0.0994
6 0.0931
7 0.0930
8 0.0913
9 0.0903
10 0.0900


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek