Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Skyline - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Manhattanville 1,338.4541 1,300.8331 1,319.5095 51.34 46.06 -0.004
2nd Merchant Marine 1,319.3166 1,286.2062 1,302.6562 48.16 48.49 0.014
3rd CMSV 1,290.3480 1,250.5383 1,270.2872 47.20 49.90 -0.009
4th Farmingdale St. 1,198.4864 1,164.8050 1,181.5257 46.37 39.96 -0.122
5th St. Joseph's (L.I.) 1,194.2737 1,157.9777 1,175.9856 29.68 25.03 -0.110
6th Mt. St. Mary (NY) 1,167.3922 1,133.1266 1,150.1318 47.67 41.78 -0.140
7th Sarah Lawrence 1,088.5208 1,053.6523 1,070.9446 40.95 41.96 -0.236
8th Old Westbury 1,018.2027 991.8098 1,004.9196 41.23 33.13 -0.292
9th St. Joseph's (Brkln) 1,012.8815 978.5815 995.5838 45.95 24.99 -0.282
10th SUNY Maritime 980.0823 947.5431 963.6754 40.01 32.62 -0.315
11th Purchase 847.7120 817.4235 832.4300 38.16 24.75 -0.441
12th Yeshiva 687.9745 651.4295 669.4526 28.23 17.96 -0.631

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st CMSV 0.1818 32.76 14.58 29.94 55.33 4.35 10.08
2nd Manhattanville 0.1794 32.40 14.46 30.31 52.91 4.56 10.56
3rd Merchant Marine 0.1723 34.45 17.22 31.57 51.13 4.85 9.08
4th Farmingdale St. 0.0977 25.68 15.91 23.64 60.83 3.82 7.51
5th St. Joseph's (L.I.) 0.0781 28.40 20.59 25.53 53.68 7.47 17.57
6th Mt. St. Mary (NY) 0.0702 24.18 17.16 22.86 64.14 4.66 10.05
7th SUNY Maritime 0.0056 21.51 20.96 20.26 64.70 6.22 6.22
8th Old Westbury 0.0040 19.78 19.38 17.10 68.90 4.50 7.09
9th Sarah Lawrence -0.0131 17.06 18.37 15.45 72.39 4.02 7.87
10th St. Joseph's (Brkln) -0.0150 15.46 16.96 13.10 73.73 3.98 10.25
11th Purchase -0.1076 13.65 24.41 11.80 73.38 4.69 4.73
12th Yeshiva -0.2084 12.13 32.96 8.87 73.81 4.42 4.22

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Merchant Marine 0.1586 32.60 16.75 30.26 52.79 4.18 10.43
2nd Manhattanville 0.1832 32.62 14.30 30.00 57.10 2.05 9.79
3rd St. Joseph's (L.I.) 0.1884 35.46 16.63 31.47 47.63 3.75 7.53
4th CMSV 0.1910 34.92 15.83 32.26 53.94 4.11 11.32
5th Mt. St. Mary (NY) 0.2106 36.43 15.37 33.29 51.34 2.98 11.83
6th Farmingdale St. 0.2192 35.32 13.39 33.14 50.43 2.66 11.26
7th Sarah Lawrence 0.2233 38.14 15.81 35.58 50.60 1.65 12.50
8th St. Joseph's (Brkln) 0.2668 38.82 12.14 35.70 49.79 0.83 13.71
9th Old Westbury 0.2959 43.41 13.82 39.35 44.08 2.71 13.32
10th SUNY Maritime 0.3202 44.73 12.71 41.14 43.43 1.14 18.26
11th Purchase 0.3329 45.32 12.02 40.48 43.23 0.64 16.99
12th Yeshiva 0.4229 53.94 11.65 48.06 31.57 0.35 27.68

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,078.0918 1,094.8140 1,101.6317 1,096.5152 1,092.7632
Difference 16.7222 23.5399 18.4233 19.5618

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Manhattanville 99 2,205 1,352 297 177 61.32 7.4 12.5 1,778 928 171 193 47.81 10.4 9.2
Merchant Marine 90 946 555 254 196 58.67 3.7 4.8 782 395 144 172 49.49 5.4 4.5
CMSV 109 2,156 1,278 295 269 59.28 7.3 8.0 1,815 947 223 215 47.82 8.1 8.4
Sarah Lawrence 96 1,948 1,145 258 216 58.78 7.6 9.0 1,805 958 213 243 46.93 8.5 7.4
Mt. St. Mary (NY) 105 1,779 1,046 285 242 58.80 6.2 7.4 1,652 937 235 258 43.28 7.0 6.4
Farmingdale St. 111 2,118 1,223 265 235 57.74 8.0 9.0 2,001 1,114 248 227 44.33 8.1 8.8
Old Westbury 66 1,315 821 181 151 62.43 7.3 8.7 1,296 787 145 125 39.28 8.9 10.4
SUNY Maritime 86 1,255 662 159 172 52.75 7.9 7.3 1,590 997 331 173 37.30 4.8 9.2
Purchase 63 939 506 113 134 53.89 8.3 7.0 1,398 952 240 162 31.90 5.8 8.6
St. Joseph's (Brkln) 64 815 480 162 101 58.90 5.0 8.1 1,305 995 194 147 23.76 6.7 8.9
Yeshiva 52 530 242 55 128 45.66 9.6 4.1 1,118 828 332 150 25.94 3.4 7.5
St. Joseph's (L.I.) 100 877 356 244 216 40.59 3.6 4.1 2,702 2,451 207 214 9.29 13.1 12.6
Conference Average 87 1,407 806 214 186 55.73 6.8 7.5 1,604 1,024 224 190 37.26 7.5 8.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Skyline

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

64.74

2019-11-09
Manhattanville
Merchant Marine
3
2
25
23
30
32
25
15
22
25
15
9
GAME

60.16

2019-10-23
CMSV
Manhattanville
0
3
23
25
22
25
26
28
GAME

59.98

2019-10-09
Manhattanville
Merchant Marine
3
2
25
18
18
25
23
25
25
18
17
15
GAME

59.76

2019-10-17
Manhattanville
Farmingdale St.
3
2
25
21
23
25
25
16
19
25
15
12
GAME

56.22

2019-10-21 Patchogue, N.Y.
St. Joseph's (L.I.)
CMSV
1
3
18
25
26
24
16
25
17
25
GAME

55.71

2019-10-15
Farmingdale St.
CMSV
1
3
25
23
22
25
14
25
18
25
GAME

55.69

2019-10-23
Farmingdale St.
St. Joseph's (L.I.)
2
3
25
20
25
22
24
26
18
25
12
15
GAME

54.97

2019-10-15
Mt. St. Mary (NY)
Manhattanville
0
3
23
25
24
26
9
25
GAME

54.88

2019-10-03
Farmingdale St.
Merchant Marine
0
3
18
25
22
25
16
25
GAME

53.86

2019-10-31
Manhattanville
St. Joseph's (L.I.)
3
0
25
13
25
22
25
16

HuskerGeek Skyline All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 17.3507
2 17.2328
3 16.2579
4 15.4797
5 14.4816
6 14.3882
7 13.7674
8 13.5285
9 13.5084
10 13.0778

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 10.7929
2 9.3450
3 8.6318
4 8.4447
5 8.1310
6 6.7172
7 6.2671
8 6.2562
9 6.2243
10 5.8339

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.5979
2 12.3081
3 11.2866
4 10.4649
5 9.9451
6 9.6458
7 9.2150
8 8.9060
9 8.2844
10 7.9602

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2084
2 0.2076
3 0.1753
4 0.1612
5 0.1547
6 0.1538
7 0.1478
8 0.1470
9 0.1468
10 0.1465

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1198
2 0.1113
3 0.0997
4 0.0883
5 0.0881
6 0.0874
7 0.0853
8 0.0782
9 0.0730
10 0.0717

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2482
2 0.1338
3 0.1297
4 0.1292
5 0.1112
6 0.1110
7 0.1057
8 0.1005
9 0.1003
10 0.0952


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek