Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Skyline - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Manhattanville 1,388.0864 1,387.1289 1,387.6076 57.69 49.26 0.068
2nd Merchant Marine 1,295.0054 1,292.1030 1,293.5534 54.76 38.58 -0.005
3rd Farmingdale St. 1,266.5085 1,264.4424 1,265.4750 53.74 42.51 -0.043
4th St. Joseph's (L.I.) 1,182.3481 1,182.7775 1,182.5628 46.20 45.81 -0.109
5th Mt. St. Mary (NY) 1,115.1834 1,115.6961 1,115.4397 41.66 45.27 -0.181
6th Sarah Lawrence 1,085.3467 1,087.8131 1,086.5792 48.55 35.05 -0.233
7th Old Westbury 1,070.4655 1,065.2778 1,067.8685 44.29 35.46 -0.264
8th St. Joseph's (Brkln) 1,036.0112 1,033.3538 1,034.6816 49.40 31.83 -0.275
9th CMSV 998.5337 1,001.2995 999.9156 39.24 33.76 -0.324
10th SUNY Maritime 921.9174 921.4861 921.7018 36.95 31.53 -0.396
11th Purchase 842.2171 841.8808 842.0489 42.07 23.96 -0.449
12th Yeshiva 801.6970 798.7630 800.2287 42.76 21.71 -0.463

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Manhattanville 0.1967 34.19 14.51 32.14 50.90 4.70 10.21
2nd Merchant Marine 0.1500 32.34 17.34 29.88 53.98 4.37 6.95
3rd Farmingdale St. 0.1359 31.64 18.05 29.93 55.27 3.83 10.13
4th St. Joseph's (L.I.) 0.0808 25.54 17.46 24.13 60.30 5.04 10.32
5th Mt. St. Mary (NY) 0.0660 24.11 17.52 22.37 62.51 4.52 8.07
6th Sarah Lawrence 0.0139 19.61 18.22 17.61 66.45 4.61 10.16
7th St. Joseph's (Brkln) -0.0046 19.44 19.90 17.35 68.27 4.58 6.73
8th Old Westbury -0.0108 22.73 23.81 21.38 61.65 4.62 6.83
9th CMSV -0.0212 20.96 23.08 19.68 62.99 5.24 7.18
10th SUNY Maritime -0.0734 16.82 24.16 15.69 69.53 5.34 5.10
11th Yeshiva -0.1183 8.69 20.52 7.65 81.95 4.19 2.16
12th Purchase -0.1186 13.68 25.54 13.16 74.39 4.86 5.15

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Manhattanville 0.1287 27.89 15.02 25.64 60.37 2.66 8.16
2nd Merchant Marine 0.1551 30.89 15.39 28.52 56.04 3.14 11.58
3rd Farmingdale St. 0.1790 33.21 15.31 30.70 50.43 3.23 9.21
4th St. Joseph's (L.I.) 0.1903 34.27 15.24 31.66 52.21 2.85 11.75
5th Sarah Lawrence 0.2471 38.84 14.13 35.70 48.66 2.09 14.06
6th Mt. St. Mary (NY) 0.2474 39.88 15.14 36.47 46.29 2.26 16.17
7th Old Westbury 0.2533 39.52 14.20 35.94 46.82 3.79 15.87
8th St. Joseph's (Brkln) 0.2702 39.17 12.15 35.52 49.17 2.21 15.58
9th CMSV 0.3032 41.26 10.94 37.68 46.77 1.41 12.12
10th SUNY Maritime 0.3226 44.95 12.69 40.19 42.71 0.83 16.79
11th Purchase 0.3308 46.22 13.14 42.60 40.49 1.08 22.07
12th Yeshiva 0.3450 45.91 11.41 41.17 40.26 1.22 21.09

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,083.1386 1,080.9827 1,084.2780 1,081.1746 1,082.3935
Difference -2.1559 1.1395 -1.9640 -0.9935

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Manhattanville 101 2,089 1,299 288 243 62.18 7.3 8.6 1,565 765 148 179 51.12 10.6 8.7
Farmingdale St. 77 1,687 1,016 236 203 60.23 7.1 8.3 1,398 739 124 200 47.14 11.3 7.0
St. Joseph's (L.I.) 103 2,173 1,180 320 329 54.30 6.8 6.6 1,948 942 208 239 51.64 9.4 8.2
Merchant Marine 79 1,046 621 150 137 59.37 7.0 7.6 967 567 149 186 41.37 6.5 5.2
Old Westbury 64 1,224 696 168 156 56.86 7.3 7.8 1,149 650 162 200 43.43 7.1 5.7
St. Joseph's (Brkln) 63 1,115 666 158 135 59.73 7.1 8.3 1,174 705 193 180 39.95 6.1 6.5
Mt. St. Mary (NY) 89 1,805 900 208 200 49.86 8.7 9.0 1,944 976 298 198 49.79 6.5 9.8
Sarah Lawrence 93 1,904 1,104 289 213 57.98 6.6 8.9 1,986 1,182 253 222 40.48 7.8 8.9
Yeshiva 54 827 479 88 141 57.92 9.4 5.9 1,262 877 234 149 30.51 5.4 8.5
Purchase 62 941 515 112 148 54.73 8.4 6.4 1,375 925 290 146 32.73 4.7 9.4
SUNY Maritime 72 1,175 552 136 213 46.98 8.6 5.5 1,574 951 272 212 39.58 5.8 7.4
CMSV 61 1,127 535 126 157 47.47 8.9 7.2 1,429 879 159 166 38.49 9.0 8.6
Conference Average 77 1,426 797 190 190 55.63 7.8 7.5 1,481 847 208 190 42.19 7.5 7.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Skyline

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

58.70

2022-11-03
Farmingdale St.
Manhattanville
0
3
21
25
22
25
22
25
GAME

58.58

2022-10-05
Farmingdale St.
Manhattanville
3
0
25
23
25
22
25
18
GAME

57.51

2022-10-27
Mt. St. Mary (NY)
Merchant Marine
0
3
18
25
17
25
16
25
GAME

56.18

2022-09-24 Hoboken, NJ
Farmingdale St.
Manhattanville
0
3
19
25
18
25
15
25
GAME

55.40

2022-10-19 Patchogue, NY
St. Joseph's (L.I.)
Manhattanville
1
3
25
19
12
25
14
25
12
25
GAME

55.12

2022-11-01
Manhattanville
Mt. St. Mary (NY)
3
0
25
22
25
6
25
13
GAME

54.83

2022-10-25
St. Joseph's (Brkln)
St. Joseph's (L.I.)
1
3
28
26
20
25
20
25
21
25
GAME

54.16

2022-10-03 Patchogue, NY
St. Joseph's (L.I.)
Merchant Marine
1
3
18
25
21
25
25
18
23
25
GAME

54.06

2022-10-13 Patchogue, NY
St. Joseph's (L.I.)
Farmingdale St.
2
3
25
20
25
22
21
25
24
26
4
15
GAME

54.03

2022-10-11
Mt. St. Mary (NY)
Sarah Lawrence
3
0
25
21
27
25
25
20

HuskerGeek Skyline All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 15.2534
2 15.0887
3 14.3362
4 13.6460
5 13.0055
6 10.5494
7 10.4934
8 10.3620
9 9.8776
10 8.6069

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 8.7977
2 8.4653
3 8.4389
4 7.5091
5 6.7247
6 5.9725
7 5.7463
8 5.5250
9 5.5045
10 4.9015

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.0957
2 9.9140
3 8.2728
4 8.0639
5 6.8271
6 6.7881
7 6.2910
8 6.1853
9 6.0956
10 6.0658

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2186
2 0.1840
3 0.1832
4 0.1795
5 0.1755
6 0.1558
7 0.1535
8 0.1524
9 0.1483
10 0.1410

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1189
2 0.1151
3 0.1147
4 0.1121
5 0.1073
6 0.0996
7 0.0910
8 0.0816
9 0.0743
10 0.0741

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1493
2 0.1262
3 0.1206
4 0.1199
5 0.1153
6 0.1106
7 0.1039
8 0.0887
9 0.0839
10 0.0820


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek