Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Samford | 1,601.2892 | 1,569.0815 | 1,585.1035 | 46.77 | 56.00 | 0.038 |
2nd | ETSU | 1,565.0459 | 1,529.1908 | 1,547.0145 | 46.28 | 53.71 | -0.007 |
3rd | Western Caro. | 1,545.9366 | 1,510.9435 | 1,528.3399 | 46.89 | 50.20 | -0.032 |
4th | Furman | 1,494.6163 | 1,460.1808 | 1,477.2983 | 40.78 | 51.49 | -0.048 |
5th | Wofford | 1,489.2990 | 1,457.1974 | 1,473.1608 | 44.39 | 47.11 | -0.059 |
6th | Mercer | 1,488.1165 | 1,456.0621 | 1,472.0020 | 42.80 | 46.06 | -0.053 |
7th | UNC Greensboro | 1,460.7906 | 1,430.3684 | 1,445.4995 | 41.66 | 48.79 | -0.093 |
8th | Chattanooga | 1,440.7638 | 1,410.2292 | 1,425.4148 | 43.99 | 45.91 | -0.116 |
9th | The Citadel | 1,439.8794 | 1,401.7771 | 1,420.7005 | 36.72 | 48.29 | -0.144 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | ETSU | 0.2242 | 36.78 | 14.35 | 34.57 | 47.58 | 5.77 | 6.69 |
2nd | Samford | 0.2214 | 37.18 | 15.04 | 34.85 | 47.15 | 5.86 | 7.22 |
3rd | Furman | 0.1960 | 33.95 | 14.34 | 31.29 | 50.92 | 5.96 | 4.26 |
4th | Western Caro. | 0.1921 | 32.02 | 12.81 | 29.56 | 53.34 | 5.50 | 5.42 |
5th | Mercer | 0.1775 | 35.79 | 18.04 | 33.63 | 46.71 | 7.11 | 6.22 |
6th | Wofford | 0.1766 | 34.24 | 16.58 | 31.39 | 48.64 | 6.54 | 7.14 |
7th | Chattanooga | 0.1528 | 31.30 | 16.02 | 28.51 | 54.91 | 6.09 | 6.42 |
8th | UNC Greensboro | 0.1463 | 31.55 | 16.92 | 29.38 | 53.23 | 5.29 | 5.74 |
9th | The Citadel | 0.1181 | 29.71 | 17.90 | 27.63 | 55.35 | 6.65 | 6.77 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Samford | 0.1838 | 34.10 | 15.72 | 31.67 | 50.78 | 6.14 | 7.50 |
2nd | Western Caro. | 0.2243 | 35.60 | 13.17 | 32.52 | 50.33 | 3.53 | 6.36 |
3rd | Mercer | 0.2302 | 37.76 | 14.74 | 34.36 | 47.87 | 6.02 | 7.73 |
4th | ETSU | 0.2311 | 37.67 | 14.56 | 34.60 | 48.53 | 6.01 | 5.69 |
5th | Wofford | 0.2356 | 37.59 | 14.03 | 34.10 | 44.85 | 5.68 | 7.86 |
6th | UNC Greensboro | 0.2393 | 38.12 | 14.20 | 34.92 | 47.21 | 4.58 | 8.13 |
7th | Furman | 0.2436 | 38.21 | 13.85 | 35.00 | 46.84 | 5.41 | 7.91 |
8th | The Citadel | 0.2624 | 39.71 | 13.46 | 37.02 | 47.91 | 4.12 | 7.87 |
9th | Chattanooga | 0.2687 | 40.08 | 13.21 | 36.44 | 46.72 | 4.24 | 6.84 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,486.0593 | 1,481.2471 | 1,479.2601 | 1,474.1537 | 1,480.1801 |
Difference | -4.8122 | -6.7992 | -11.9056 | -7.8390 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Samford | 110 | 2,280 | 1,143 | 177 | 238 | 50.13 | 12.9 | 9.6 | 2,061 | 900 | 163 | 203 | 56.33 | 12.6 | 10.2 |
ETSU | 113 | 2,523 | 1,292 | 193 | 260 | 51.21 | 13.1 | 9.7 | 2,309 | 1,036 | 122 | 203 | 55.13 | 18.9 | 11.4 |
Western Caro. | 113 | 2,454 | 1,271 | 146 | 156 | 51.79 | 16.8 | 15.7 | 2,361 | 1,135 | 148 | 226 | 51.93 | 16.0 | 10.4 |
Wofford | 116 | 2,471 | 1,226 | 196 | 274 | 49.62 | 12.6 | 9.0 | 2,522 | 1,288 | 193 | 248 | 48.93 | 13.1 | 10.2 |
Mercer | 110 | 2,389 | 1,168 | 162 | 308 | 48.89 | 14.7 | 7.8 | 2,402 | 1,250 | 168 | 212 | 47.96 | 14.3 | 11.3 |
Chattanooga | 115 | 2,387 | 1,164 | 171 | 233 | 48.76 | 14.0 | 10.2 | 2,575 | 1,338 | 159 | 235 | 48.04 | 16.2 | 11.0 |
UNC Greensboro | 97 | 2,017 | 938 | 133 | 210 | 46.51 | 15.2 | 9.6 | 2,147 | 1,077 | 172 | 189 | 49.84 | 12.5 | 11.4 |
The Citadel | 108 | 2,240 | 1,006 | 174 | 259 | 44.91 | 12.9 | 8.6 | 2,404 | 1,173 | 183 | 229 | 51.21 | 13.1 | 10.5 |
Furman | 104 | 2,238 | 994 | 99 | 142 | 44.42 | 22.6 | 15.8 | 2,379 | 1,152 | 185 | 220 | 51.58 | 12.9 | 10.8 |
Conference Average | 110 | 2,333 | 1,134 | 161 | 231 | 48.47 | 15.0 | 10.7 | 2,351 | 1,150 | 166 | 218 | 51.22 | 14.4 | 10.8 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
75.76 |
2019-11-09 | Greenville, S.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
74.34 |
2019-10-04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
72.90 |
2019-10-23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
72.56 |
2019-10-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
72.17 |
2019-09-27 | Greenville, S.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
72.16 |
2019-11-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
72.13 |
2019-10-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
71.61 |
2019-10-19 | Birmingham, Ala. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
71.52 |
2019-11-08 | Greenville, S.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
70.58 |
2019-10-18 | Birmingham, Ala. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Riley Coonan | Wofford | A |
Lauren Deaton | Samford | A |
Kelsi Hobbs | Samford | A |
Courtney Hoffman | Furman | A |
Merry Gebel | Western Caro. | D |
Meagan Sanchez | Western Caro. | D |
Hannah Price | Western Caro. | S |
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Jaida Howell | Mercer | A |
Kaela Massey | ETSU | A |
Sierra Rayzor | Samford | A |
Abigail Veit | Western Caro. | A |
Emily Naubert | Samford | D |
Emily Arnold | ETSU | S |
Corinne Meglic | Samford | S |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Hannah Price | Western Caro. |
2 | Merry Gebel | Western Caro. |
3 | Emily Arnold | ETSU |
4 | Lauren Deaton | Samford |
5 | Kelsi Hobbs | Samford |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Lauren Deaton | Samford |
2 | Kelsi Hobbs | Samford |
3 | Kaela Massey | ETSU |
4 | Abigail Veit | Western Caro. |
5 | Nicole Mack | Furman |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Hannah Price | Western Caro. |
2 | Emily Arnold | ETSU |
3 | Corinne Meglic | Samford |
4 | Katie Murphy | Furman |
5 | Gabriela McHugh | UNC Greensboro |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Meagan Sanchez | Western Caro. |
2 | Emily Naubert | Samford |
3 | Marija Popovic | ETSU |
4 | Andrea Aceveda | Furman |
5 | Megan Kaufman | Chattanooga |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Merry Gebel | Western Caro. | 22.4125 |
2 | Emily Arnold | ETSU | 21.9295 |
3 | Hannah Price | Western Caro. | 21.0805 |
4 | Abigail Veit | Western Caro. | 20.8348 |
5 | Kelsi Hobbs | Samford | 19.6717 |
6 | Katie Murphy | Furman | 19.3892 |
7 | Lauren Deaton | Samford | 19.3697 |
8 | Meagan Sanchez | Western Caro. | 18.9823 |
9 | Kaela Massey | ETSU | 18.6106 |
10 | Nicole Mack | Furman | 17.8228 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Emily Arnold | ETSU | 16.6183 |
2 | Katie Murphy | Furman | 13.5033 |
3 | Hannah Price | Western Caro. | 12.6630 |
4 | Kelsi Hobbs | Samford | 12.1045 |
5 | Kaela Massey | ETSU | 11.8208 |
6 | Corinne Meglic | Samford | 11.6235 |
7 | Merry Gebel | Western Caro. | 11.5685 |
8 | Maddie Halsey | Chattanooga | 11.1753 |
9 | Lauren Deaton | Samford | 10.9611 |
10 | Gabriela McHugh | UNC Greensboro | 10.7161 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Meagan Sanchez | Western Caro. | 19.1990 |
2 | Megan Kaufman | Chattanooga | 15.0962 |
3 | Andrea Aceveda | Furman | 13.6273 |
4 | Marija Popovic | ETSU | 13.5751 |
5 | Emily Naubert | Samford | 12.5639 |
6 | Megan Smith | Mercer | 11.4256 |
7 | Catie Cronister | Wofford | 11.4145 |
8 | Grace Howell | UNC Greensboro | 11.3657 |
9 | Kenzie Kellerman | The Citadel | 11.2705 |
10 | Emily Durham | Wofford | 11.0968 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hannah Price | Western Caro. | 0.2151 |
2 | Merry Gebel | Western Caro. | 0.2056 |
3 | Emily Arnold | ETSU | 0.1994 |
4 | Kelsi Hobbs | Samford | 0.1967 |
5 | Lauren Deaton | Samford | 0.1937 |
6 | Abigail Veit | Western Caro. | 0.1911 |
7 | Nicole Mack | Furman | 0.1896 |
8 | Katie Murphy | Furman | 0.1864 |
9 | Gabriela McHugh | UNC Greensboro | 0.1823 |
10 | Maria Esch | UNC Greensboro | 0.1789 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Emily Arnold | ETSU | 0.1511 |
2 | Katie Murphy | Furman | 0.1298 |
3 | Hannah Price | Western Caro. | 0.1292 |
4 | Kelsi Hobbs | Samford | 0.1210 |
5 | Corinne Meglic | Samford | 0.1162 |
6 | Gabriela McHugh | UNC Greensboro | 0.1152 |
7 | Kaela Massey | ETSU | 0.1105 |
8 | Lauren Deaton | Samford | 0.1096 |
9 | Maddie Halsey | Chattanooga | 0.1085 |
10 | Lorissa King | Wofford | 0.1074 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Meagan Sanchez | Western Caro. | 0.1761 |
2 | Marija Popovic | ETSU | 0.1429 |
3 | Andrea Aceveda | Furman | 0.1405 |
4 | Megan Kaufman | Chattanooga | 0.1313 |
5 | Emily Naubert | Samford | 0.1269 |
6 | Grace Howell | UNC Greensboro | 0.1222 |
7 | Megan Smith | Mercer | 0.1178 |
8 | Kenzie Kellerman | The Citadel | 0.1138 |
9 | Nicole Mack | Furman | 0.1031 |
10 | Catie Cronister | Wofford | 0.1019 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.