Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Southeastern - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Florida 1,670.3685 1,657.4657 1,663.9046 53.82 72.62 0.287
2nd Tennessee 1,626.4083 1,622.6101 1,624.5081 49.90 71.35 0.224
3rd Kentucky 1,587.9135 1,598.0707 1,592.9840 50.52 68.21 0.194
4th Arkansas 1,542.3754 1,544.0936 1,543.2343 49.17 64.83 0.143
5th LSU 1,540.5855 1,528.5035 1,534.5326 47.84 65.59 0.134
6th Ole Miss 1,511.8676 1,516.8091 1,514.3363 47.05 64.37 0.110
7th Mississippi St. 1,461.1330 1,465.8763 1,463.5027 44.80 61.88 0.060
8th Georgia 1,463.1141 1,460.0266 1,461.5695 44.68 62.05 0.056
9th Auburn 1,463.5778 1,456.6763 1,460.1230 44.18 62.49 0.089
10th South Carolina 1,461.2960 1,452.6746 1,456.9789 43.16 62.79 0.059
11th Alabama 1,446.9243 1,431.5371 1,439.2101 44.28 60.67 0.060

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Florida 0.3722 48.40 11.19 44.17 39.51 3.32 7.62
2nd Tennessee 0.3288 44.89 12.01 41.22 41.09 4.71 5.90
3rd Kentucky 0.3068 44.22 13.54 40.77 42.47 4.08 6.81
4th Arkansas 0.2731 41.41 14.10 38.21 45.24 5.05 6.09
5th LSU 0.2679 41.42 14.63 38.32 44.08 4.47 6.05
6th South Carolina 0.2593 38.40 12.47 35.81 50.33 4.12 5.21
7th Auburn 0.2572 40.69 14.97 37.63 44.73 5.04 4.50
8th Ole Miss 0.2560 40.75 15.15 37.51 45.97 4.02 5.26
9th Georgia 0.2537 41.04 15.67 38.00 44.56 5.99 6.30
10th Alabama 0.2432 36.90 12.58 34.04 52.43 4.98 5.44
11th Mississippi St. 0.2377 38.00 14.23 35.72 49.58 5.22 4.71

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Florida 0.0847 28.16 19.69 25.97 54.52 8.42 3.68
2nd Tennessee 0.1044 28.64 18.20 26.90 56.52 7.82 3.56
3rd Kentucky 0.1128 28.85 17.57 26.51 55.42 8.27 2.93
4th Arkansas 0.1306 31.63 18.57 30.05 51.37 7.67 4.81
5th LSU 0.1336 29.07 15.71 26.89 57.63 6.96 3.69
6th Ole Miss 0.1459 32.64 18.06 30.19 51.48 7.38 4.03
7th Auburn 0.1684 32.97 16.13 29.81 51.50 6.85 4.29
8th Mississippi St. 0.1773 34.14 16.41 32.15 50.31 7.02 4.88
9th Alabama 0.1833 33.90 15.57 31.88 53.17 4.85 5.61
10th Georgia 0.1977 35.62 15.86 33.34 49.64 7.56 4.96
11th South Carolina 0.2007 33.80 13.73 31.54 54.31 4.41 5.70

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,523.1713 1,516.8633 1,510.0403 1,503.4351 1,513.3775
Difference -6.3080 -13.1309 -19.7362 -13.0584

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Florida 117 2,734 1,277 183 304 46.71 14.9 9.0 2,267 768 93 255 66.12 24.4 8.9
Tennessee 124 2,900 1,263 142 332 43.55 20.4 8.7 2,530 871 105 233 65.57 24.1 10.9
LSU 114 2,563 1,174 147 240 45.81 17.4 10.7 2,302 889 91 223 61.38 25.3 10.3
Kentucky 126 2,884 1,250 165 299 43.34 17.5 9.6 2,673 1,012 94 205 62.14 28.4 13.0
Arkansas 112 2,282 997 136 180 43.69 16.8 12.7 2,148 862 119 207 59.87 18.1 10.4
Ole Miss 109 2,357 958 103 211 40.65 22.9 11.2 2,382 986 110 251 58.61 21.7 9.5
South Carolina 104 2,241 888 103 178 39.63 21.8 12.6 2,289 943 137 192 58.80 16.7 11.9
Mississippi St. 106 2,181 874 92 139 40.07 23.7 15.7 2,259 958 121 230 57.59 18.7 9.8
Alabama 113 2,374 951 114 215 40.06 20.8 11.0 2,508 1,093 147 222 56.42 17.1 11.3
Auburn 108 2,313 899 87 287 38.87 26.6 8.1 2,450 1,042 113 246 57.47 21.7 10.0
Georgia 111 2,365 926 130 223 39.15 18.2 10.6 2,500 1,078 131 219 56.88 19.1 11.4
Conference Average 113 2,472 1,042 127 237 41.96 20.1 10.9 2,392 955 115 226 60.08 21.4 10.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Southeastern

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

79.15

2011-11-23 Knoxville, Tenn.
Tennessee
Kentucky
3
1
28
30
25
20
30
28
25
18
GAME

76.50

2011-10-30 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
Florida
3
2
25
23
19
25
25
21
17
25
15
9
GAME

76.08

2011-11-13 Fayetteville, Ark.
Arkansas
Florida
2
3
25
18
32
30
21
25
24
26
9
15
GAME

75.73

2011-11-13 Oxford, Miss.
Ole Miss
Kentucky
2
3
21
25
23
25
25
19
33
31
15
17
GAME

75.41

2011-09-25 Gainesville, Fla.
Florida
Tennessee
2
3
21
25
25
20
21
25
25
19
16
18
GAME

75.20

2011-11-04 Auburn, Ala.
Auburn
LSU
1
3
26
28
35
33
25
27
23
25
GAME

75.19

2011-11-11 Oxford, Miss.
Ole Miss
Tennessee
2
3
24
26
28
26
23
25
25
17
13
15
GAME

74.72

2011-11-20 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
Arkansas
3
2
18
25
26
28
25
23
25
21
15
13
GAME

74.16

2011-10-12 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
Tennessee
3
2
26
24
24
26
25
20
24
26
15
13
GAME

73.69

2011-11-13 Baton Rouge, La.
LSU
South Carolina
3
2
22
25
24
26
25
21
25
23
15
6

HuskerGeek Southeastern All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 31.8029
2 27.3472
3 25.8908
4 25.8875
5 22.6188
6 22.5816
7 21.8937
8 21.8905
9 21.5457
10 21.5183

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.2804
2 18.3700
3 17.8647
4 16.8406
5 15.2721
6 15.2625
7 14.4633
8 14.2979
9 13.1529
10 12.6012

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.3747
2 16.6482
3 15.4361
4 15.2829
5 14.0594
6 13.4329
7 12.6508
8 12.4765
9 12.1837
10 11.8913

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2565
2 0.2420
3 0.2391
4 0.2218
5 0.2213
6 0.2146
7 0.2110
8 0.2088
9 0.2077
10 0.2034

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1795
2 0.1497
3 0.1481
4 0.1441
5 0.1439
6 0.1402
7 0.1375
8 0.1327
9 0.1265
10 0.1248

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1617
2 0.1542
3 0.1470
4 0.1290
5 0.1245
6 0.1172
7 0.1147
8 0.1124
9 0.1083
10 0.1081


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek