Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Southwestern - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Jackson St. 1,289.6782 1,299.4471 1,294.5534 38.30 52.02 -0.093
2nd Alabama A&M 1,237.5969 1,195.7852 1,216.5115 35.32 49.57 -0.153
3rd Alabama St. 1,144.7919 1,131.3616 1,138.0569 30.99 45.84 -0.266
4th Prairie View 1,150.1678 1,115.0724 1,132.4842 30.93 42.91 -0.269
5th Grambling 1,076.8217 1,085.5684 1,081.1862 28.49 39.68 -0.270
6th Texas Southern 1,091.5442 1,048.7880 1,069.9526 42.45 60.06 -0.288
7th Mississippi Val. 1,022.5740 1,002.7171 1,012.5969 26.75 39.84 -0.354
8th Southern U. 1,025.0595 999.3645 1,012.1305 26.89 40.26 -0.336
9th Ark.-Pine Bluff 1,013.5199 998.9302 1,006.1986 28.84 36.47 -0.361
10th Alcorn 807.8767 797.8584 802.8519 19.06 30.83 -0.567

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Texas Southern 0.1717 37.62 20.45 24.38 50.15 10.55 -0.11
2nd Jackson St. 0.1529 32.50 17.21 32.27 53.60 7.07 4.31
3rd Alabama A&M 0.1149 29.91 18.42 26.89 55.62 5.71 3.65
4th Alabama St. 0.0712 27.00 19.88 25.78 56.77 6.26 4.53
5th Prairie View 0.0506 28.06 22.99 26.04 56.67 8.43 3.21
6th Mississippi Val. 0.0417 25.36 21.19 22.04 53.85 7.97 4.01
7th Grambling 0.0394 24.75 20.81 23.68 60.96 8.26 3.28
8th Southern U. 0.0045 22.98 22.53 20.47 61.46 7.87 1.88
9th Ark.-Pine Bluff -0.0357 19.50 23.07 15.77 62.00 6.82 4.46
10th Alcorn -0.0885 17.34 26.19 13.45 66.85 9.26 1.94

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Jackson St. 0.2457 38.88 14.31 36.72 48.52 5.81 7.35
2nd Alabama A&M 0.2681 42.66 15.85 38.95 41.98 4.70 6.75
3rd Grambling 0.3095 43.26 12.31 39.33 44.43 4.66 9.50
4th Prairie View 0.3193 45.98 14.05 41.80 38.74 3.88 9.61
5th Ark.-Pine Bluff 0.3248 46.07 13.59 41.20 36.59 2.13 9.24
6th Alabama St. 0.3369 45.87 12.19 41.87 41.44 1.14 6.72
7th Southern U. 0.3401 46.57 12.56 42.60 38.06 3.42 8.56
8th Mississippi Val. 0.3952 49.79 10.27 45.09 38.57 2.07 8.85
9th Texas Southern 0.4598 53.18 7.21 50.71 18.88 9.26 9.78
10th Alcorn 0.4785 56.31 8.46 47.81 39.42 5.01 15.40

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,076.6523 1,083.6397 1,074.4012 1,074.0550 1,077.1870
Difference 6.9874 -2.2511 -2.5973 0.7130

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Texas Southern 8 99 99 13 16 100.00 7.6 6.2 22 0 9 16 100.00 2.4 1.4
Jackson St. 124 2,587 1,266 185 217 48.94 14.0 11.9 2,273 929 147 197 59.13 15.5 11.5
Alabama A&M 127 2,486 1,081 182 220 43.48 13.7 11.3 2,544 1,154 162 267 54.64 15.7 9.5
Alabama St. 116 2,131 923 191 248 43.31 11.2 8.6 2,246 1,058 148 256 52.89 15.2 8.8
Prairie View 92 1,509 626 99 135 41.48 15.2 11.2 1,812 937 172 186 48.29 10.5 9.7
Southern U. 99 1,697 684 94 149 40.31 18.1 11.4 2,051 1,050 154 185 48.81 13.3 11.1
Mississippi Val. 73 947 383 99 137 40.44 9.6 6.9 1,147 590 111 120 48.56 10.3 9.6
Ark.-Pine Bluff 85 1,255 484 113 173 38.57 11.1 7.3 1,774 1,025 157 167 42.22 11.3 10.6
Grambling 104 1,065 383 109 112 35.96 9.8 9.5 1,505 849 211 185 43.59 7.1 8.1
Alcorn 71 473 136 60 114 28.75 7.9 4.1 878 560 271 127 36.22 3.2 6.9
Conference Average 90 1,425 607 115 152 46.12 11.8 8.8 1,625 815 154 171 53.43 10.5 8.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Southwestern

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

59.76

2011-11-10 Normal,AL
Alabama A&M
Alabama St.
3
1
22
25
28
26
25
19
28
26
GAME

58.49

2011-10-24 Jackson, Miss.
Jackson St.
Alabama A&M
3
2
17
25
25
19
22
25
25
16
15
11
GAME

58.31

2011-10-14 Normal,AL
Alabama A&M
Jackson St.
2
3
25
23
16
25
15
25
25
19
5
15
GAME

57.49

2011-11-20 Westwego, La.
Alabama A&M
Jackson St.
1
3
25
21
17
25
21
25
22
25
GAME

56.09

2011-11-19 Westwego, La.
Alabama A&M
Prairie View
3
2
26
24
24
26
25
19
20
25
16
14
GAME

53.99

2011-10-15 Montgomery, Ala.
Alabama St.
Jackson St.
0
3
21
25
21
25
20
25
GAME

53.89

2011-11-20 Westwego, La.
Alabama A&M
Southern U.
3
0
25
22
30
28
25
18
GAME

53.08

2011-11-04 Jackson, Miss
Jackson St.
Alabama St.
3
0
27
25
25
17
25
13
GAME

52.96

2011-10-19 Montgomery, Ala.
Alabama St.
Alabama A&M
1
3
20
25
25
14
17
25
16
25
GAME

52.82

2011-11-20 Westwego, La.
Alabama St.
Jackson St.
1
3
19
25
17
25
25
23
9
25

HuskerGeek Southwestern All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 18.8962
2 18.3714
3 16.6148
4 16.0257
5 15.2693
6 14.6020
7 13.3485
8 12.8645
9 10.4812
10 10.2625

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.1074
2 10.8632
3 10.0094
4 9.9311
5 9.7987
6 8.6501
7 7.1787
8 6.9793
9 6.9636
10 5.9414

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.3664
2 9.3921
3 8.9651
4 8.5782
5 8.2900
6 7.2417
7 7.0136
8 6.6139
9 6.2640
10 6.2270

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1658
2 0.1612
3 0.1408
4 0.1376
5 0.1358
6 0.1309
7 0.1261
8 0.1248
9 0.1104
10 0.1025

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1062
2 0.0981
3 0.0921
4 0.0871
5 0.0830
6 0.0774
7 0.0739
8 0.0704
9 0.0629
10 0.0614

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1006
2 0.0971
3 0.0921
4 0.0870
5 0.0833
6 0.0786
7 0.0779
8 0.0765
9 0.0747
10 0.0678


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek