Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Southwestern - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Alabama St. 1,508.4470 1,502.0045 1,505.2223 38.25 52.76 -0.078
2nd Alabama St. 1,508.4470 1,502.0045 1,505.2223 38.25 52.76 -0.078
3rd Texas Southern 1,404.0202 1,400.6006 1,402.3093 33.31 46.86 -0.192
4th Texas Southern 1,404.0202 1,400.6006 1,402.3093 33.31 46.86 -0.192
5th Alabama A&M 1,394.7936 1,397.0008 1,395.8968 33.52 45.09 -0.208
6th Alabama A&M 1,394.7936 1,397.0008 1,395.8968 33.52 45.09 -0.208
7th Ark.-Pine Bluff 1,355.9003 1,363.2994 1,359.5948 31.19 42.53 -0.264
8th Ark.-Pine Bluff 1,355.9003 1,363.2994 1,359.5948 31.19 42.53 -0.264
9th Southern U. 1,346.5117 1,350.4112 1,348.4601 30.83 44.65 -0.249
10th Southern U. 1,346.5117 1,350.4112 1,348.4601 30.83 44.65 -0.249
11th Prairie View 1,331.0207 1,341.9173 1,336.4579 30.38 42.90 -0.267
12th Prairie View 1,331.0207 1,341.9173 1,336.4579 30.38 42.90 -0.267
13th Jackson St. 1,324.3511 1,319.8535 1,322.1004 30.42 41.57 -0.269
14th Jackson St. 1,324.3511 1,319.8535 1,322.1004 30.42 41.57 -0.269
15th Grambling 1,313.5129 1,314.4327 1,313.9727 30.42 38.74 -0.305
16th Grambling 1,313.5129 1,314.4327 1,313.9727 30.42 38.74 -0.305
17th Mississippi Val. 1,261.0209 1,265.5522 1,263.2846 27.29 36.45 -0.354
18th Mississippi Val. 1,261.0209 1,265.5522 1,263.2846 27.29 36.45 -0.354
19th Alcorn 1,149.7390 1,143.4872 1,146.6088 23.25 31.83 -0.438
20th Alcorn 1,149.7390 1,143.4872 1,146.6088 23.25 31.83 -0.438

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Alabama St. 0.1660 33.69 17.09 30.78 50.76 4.91 4.32
2nd Alabama St. 0.1660 33.69 17.09 30.78 50.76 4.91 4.32
3rd Alabama A&M 0.0943 28.09 18.66 26.21 57.09 6.34 3.80
4th Alabama A&M 0.0943 28.09 18.66 26.21 57.09 6.34 3.80
5th Texas Southern 0.0940 28.01 18.62 26.36 57.44 6.38 3.04
6th Texas Southern 0.0940 28.01 18.62 26.36 57.44 6.38 3.04
7th Ark.-Pine Bluff 0.0756 26.89 19.33 25.24 58.83 6.05 4.61
8th Ark.-Pine Bluff 0.0756 26.89 19.33 25.24 58.83 6.05 4.61
9th Southern U. 0.0492 25.67 20.75 23.37 58.89 6.32 3.48
10th Southern U. 0.0492 25.67 20.75 23.37 58.89 6.32 3.48
11th Jackson St. 0.0475 25.79 21.04 23.96 57.33 7.23 3.41
12th Jackson St. 0.0475 25.79 21.04 23.96 57.33 7.23 3.41
13th Prairie View 0.0383 26.60 22.76 25.27 56.74 7.50 1.98
14th Prairie View 0.0383 26.60 22.76 25.27 56.74 7.50 1.98
15th Grambling 0.0152 22.74 21.22 21.18 62.80 7.44 3.76
16th Grambling 0.0152 22.74 21.22 21.18 62.80 7.44 3.76
17th Mississippi Val. -0.0204 17.62 19.66 16.71 68.68 5.69 2.77
18th Mississippi Val. -0.0204 17.62 19.66 16.71 68.68 5.69 2.77
19th Alcorn -0.0605 18.72 24.77 17.03 65.85 6.88 3.91
20th Alcorn -0.0605 18.72 24.77 17.03 65.85 6.88 3.91

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Alabama St. 0.2444 39.32 14.88 36.60 45.80 6.09 8.27
2nd Alabama St. 0.2444 39.32 14.88 36.60 45.80 6.09 8.27
3rd Texas Southern 0.2856 41.71 13.15 39.61 41.40 5.75 7.28
4th Texas Southern 0.2856 41.71 13.15 39.61 41.40 5.75 7.28
5th Southern U. 0.2980 43.36 13.56 40.46 40.82 5.55 8.48
6th Southern U. 0.2980 43.36 13.56 40.46 40.82 5.55 8.48
7th Alabama A&M 0.3027 44.11 13.84 40.80 42.42 5.55 9.34
8th Alabama A&M 0.3027 44.11 13.84 40.80 42.42 5.55 9.34
9th Prairie View 0.3055 42.73 12.19 39.50 43.57 3.94 8.73
10th Prairie View 0.3055 42.73 12.19 39.50 43.57 3.94 8.73
11th Jackson St. 0.3162 44.62 13.00 40.84 40.82 4.16 8.52
12th Jackson St. 0.3162 44.62 13.00 40.84 40.82 4.16 8.52
13th Grambling 0.3207 45.12 13.05 42.42 39.98 5.66 8.84
14th Grambling 0.3207 45.12 13.05 42.42 39.98 5.66 8.84
15th Mississippi Val. 0.3340 44.36 10.96 41.47 44.32 1.93 8.82
16th Mississippi Val. 0.3340 44.36 10.96 41.47 44.32 1.93 8.82
17th Ark.-Pine Bluff 0.3391 45.08 11.17 41.78 40.55 4.25 8.76
18th Ark.-Pine Bluff 0.3391 45.08 11.17 41.78 40.55 4.25 8.76
19th Alcorn 0.3779 48.11 10.32 44.33 38.53 2.73 11.82
20th Alcorn 0.3779 48.11 10.32 44.33 38.53 2.73 11.82

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,339.3908 1,340.8880 1,342.7596 1,344.1828 1,341.8053
Difference 1.4972 3.3688 4.7920 3.2194

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Alabama St. 142 3,161 1,530 196 233 48.40 16.1 13.6 2,830 1,185 209 260 58.13 13.5 10.9
Texas Southern 97 2,120 984 124 169 46.42 17.1 12.5 2,085 946 117 156 54.63 17.8 13.4
Alabama A&M 113 2,406 1,101 149 122 45.76 16.1 19.7 2,459 1,169 195 208 52.46 12.6 11.8
Prairie View 96 1,995 875 92 140 43.86 21.7 14.3 2,175 1,066 157 172 50.99 13.9 12.6
Grambling 130 2,589 1,186 180 199 45.81 14.4 13.0 2,841 1,449 210 198 49.00 13.5 14.3
Southern U. 108 2,186 940 126 173 43.00 17.3 12.6 2,378 1,151 168 230 51.60 14.2 10.3
Ark.-Pine Bluff 108 2,120 923 150 193 43.54 14.1 11.0 2,400 1,220 176 170 49.17 13.6 14.1
Jackson St. 125 2,372 994 136 194 41.91 17.4 12.2 2,822 1,457 202 208 48.37 14.0 13.6
Mississippi Val. 108 1,957 795 109 145 40.62 18.0 13.5 2,523 1,388 184 187 44.99 13.7 13.5
Alcorn 105 1,633 584 102 234 35.76 16.0 7.0 2,539 1,534 268 204 39.58 9.5 12.4
Conference Average 113 2,254 991 136 180 43.51 16.8 12.9 2,505 1,257 189 199 49.89 13.6 12.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Southwestern

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

68.85

2017-09-22 Houston, Texas
Texas Southern
Alabama A&M
1
3
22
25
28
30
30
28
14
25
GAME

68.71

2017-10-22 Montgomery, Ala.
Alabama St.
Texas Southern
3
2
24
26
21
25
25
19
25
22
15
10
GAME

65.35

2017-09-24 Houston, Texas
Alabama A&M
Ark.-Pine Bluff
3
1
25
16
24
26
25
17
27
25
GAME

64.98

2017-11-02 Houston, Texas
Texas Southern
Prairie View
1
3
24
26
22
25
25
14
24
26
GAME

64.81

2017-09-23 Houston, Texas
Alabama St.
Ark.-Pine Bluff
3
1
22
25
25
15
25
19
25
19
GAME

64.74

2017-09-24 Houston, Texas
Texas Southern
Alabama St.
1
3
25
18
23
25
19
25
14
25
GAME

64.40

2017-10-29 Houston, Texas
Texas Southern
Southern U.
3
1
25
14
25
27
25
21
25
20
GAME

64.20

2017-11-19 Jackson, Miss.
Alabama St.
Texas Southern
3
1
25
20
21
25
25
21
25
18
GAME

63.91

2017-09-22 Houston, Texas
Alabama St.
Southern U.
3
2
20
25
25
16
28
30
25
18
15
11
GAME

63.58

2017-09-23 Houston, Texas
Alabama St.
Prairie View
3
0
25
19
25
22
25
18

HuskerGeek Southwestern All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 18.5058
2 17.6184
3 16.8386
4 16.1738
5 16.1158
6 15.9793
7 15.1422
8 14.7738
9 14.5584
10 13.7156

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.4879
2 10.7385
3 10.6668
4 9.2707
5 8.8337
6 7.8033
7 7.3346
8 6.8923
9 6.6433
10 6.5587

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.8849
2 13.5365
3 13.4780
4 11.8806
5 11.0647
6 10.3413
7 9.9972
8 9.6791
9 9.3427
10 9.0527

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1696
2 0.1395
3 0.1381
4 0.1364
5 0.1316
6 0.1303
7 0.1300
8 0.1284
9 0.1270
10 0.1241

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1004
2 0.0950
3 0.0789
4 0.0772
5 0.0751
6 0.0683
7 0.0653
8 0.0650
9 0.0641
10 0.0619

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1404
2 0.1319
3 0.1253
4 0.1141
5 0.1066
6 0.0969
7 0.0935
8 0.0933
9 0.0926
10 0.0924


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek