Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Summit League - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st South Dakota 1,662.2281 1,628.8543 1,645.4566 51.87 57.12 0.114
2nd Denver 1,635.7319 1,598.1505 1,616.8320 50.76 54.87 0.059
3rd Omaha 1,605.7230 1,574.0347 1,589.7999 48.62 55.96 0.052
4th Purdue Fort Wayne 1,538.1411 1,503.2684 1,520.6048 44.75 54.58 -0.021
5th North Dakota St. 1,525.3288 1,496.6526 1,510.9227 49.13 48.43 -0.048
6th Oral Roberts 1,493.1404 1,464.1904 1,478.5946 44.29 50.93 -0.056
7th Western Ill. 1,473.4937 1,437.1120 1,455.1892 41.93 50.65 -0.089
8th South Dakota St. 1,468.9104 1,435.0114 1,451.8619 42.81 48.77 -0.101
9th North Dakota 1,456.3161 1,419.9854 1,438.0360 40.86 50.33 -0.093

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st South Dakota 0.2704 40.81 13.76 38.18 47.12 4.97 6.63
2nd Omaha 0.2419 39.34 15.15 36.95 45.36 4.83 7.67
3rd Denver 0.2338 39.28 15.91 36.47 44.82 5.72 8.15
4th Purdue Fort Wayne 0.1947 34.38 14.91 32.34 51.40 5.55 5.23
5th Oral Roberts 0.1907 33.41 14.34 31.11 53.63 5.32 6.36
6th North Dakota St. 0.1852 34.45 15.93 32.17 48.48 5.09 5.47
7th North Dakota 0.1683 31.29 14.46 28.83 56.74 4.72 5.37
8th Western Ill. 0.1570 32.15 16.45 29.51 52.33 5.65 5.97
9th South Dakota St. 0.1514 31.93 16.80 29.07 52.65 6.07 5.78

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st South Dakota 0.1568 31.19 15.50 28.96 54.95 7.12 5.88
2nd Denver 0.1752 35.06 17.53 32.06 49.47 7.22 4.77
3rd Omaha 0.1895 34.37 15.42 32.05 50.52 6.15 6.17
4th Purdue Fort Wayne 0.2161 36.30 14.68 33.64 49.04 5.86 5.86
5th North Dakota St. 0.2328 36.40 13.12 33.90 49.71 5.34 6.18
6th Western Ill. 0.2457 40.07 15.50 37.19 43.82 6.84 6.58
7th Oral Roberts 0.2465 37.56 12.91 35.23 48.50 4.52 6.96
8th South Dakota St. 0.2522 39.32 14.10 36.40 45.89 5.38 7.42
9th North Dakota 0.2617 40.28 14.11 37.12 46.59 5.43 8.43

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,523.0331 1,517.6864 1,511.0222 1,503.3740 1,513.7789
Difference -5.3466 -12.0109 -19.6591 -12.3389

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
South Dakota 119 2,721 1,444 171 243 53.07 15.9 11.2 2,310 1,035 130 193 55.20 17.8 12.0
Denver 113 2,392 1,248 196 234 52.17 12.2 10.2 2,164 1,030 112 220 52.40 19.3 9.8
Omaha 125 2,783 1,381 202 315 49.62 13.8 8.8 2,593 1,191 151 216 54.07 17.2 12.0
Purdue Fort Wayne 124 2,632 1,244 131 197 47.26 20.1 13.4 2,629 1,208 150 212 54.05 17.5 12.4
North Dakota St. 112 2,362 1,185 126 147 50.17 18.7 16.1 2,456 1,304 148 221 46.91 16.6 11.1
North Dakota 113 2,353 1,073 140 208 45.60 16.8 11.3 2,550 1,254 205 243 50.82 12.4 10.5
Oral Roberts 123 2,585 1,199 156 199 46.38 16.6 13.0 2,783 1,401 177 238 49.66 15.7 11.7
Western Ill. 107 2,160 975 132 235 45.14 16.4 9.2 2,340 1,166 142 210 50.17 16.5 11.1
South Dakota St. 107 2,158 973 119 168 45.09 18.1 12.8 2,457 1,281 172 209 47.86 14.3 11.8
Conference Average 116 2,461 1,191 153 216 48.28 16.5 11.8 2,476 1,208 154 218 51.24 16.4 11.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Summit League

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

76.94

2019-09-29
Omaha
North Dakota St.
3
1
23
25
26
24
25
23
28
26
GAME

76.52

2019-11-01
Omaha
South Dakota
1
3
27
25
24
26
21
25
14
25
GAME

76.48

2019-11-08 Fort Wayne, Ind.
Purdue Fort Wayne
Omaha
1
3
25
22
29
31
23
25
21
25
GAME

76.13

2019-10-04
South Dakota
Omaha
3
2
25
21
25
23
20
25
25
27
15
11
GAME

75.55

2019-11-03
South Dakota
Denver
3
1
21
25
30
28
25
15
25
16
GAME

75.48

2019-10-15
Omaha
Denver
2
3
25
19
26
28
26
24
19
25
10
15
GAME

71.94

2019-10-18
Oral Roberts
North Dakota
2
3
28
26
18
25
23
25
25
18
12
15
GAME

71.93

2019-10-06
Denver
South Dakota
2
3
23
25
25
11
25
20
16
25
13
15
GAME

71.53

2019-11-17 Fort Wayne, Ind.
Purdue Fort Wayne
South Dakota
0
3
23
25
17
25
19
25
GAME

71.32

2019-11-08
South Dakota
North Dakota St.
3
0
25
22
25
18
28
26

HuskerGeek Summit League All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.5992
2 24.2946
3 22.9552
4 20.6484
5 20.4237
6 19.0928
7 18.7663
8 18.5952
9 18.2445
10 17.5864

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.7618
2 13.3272
3 12.8827
4 12.7247
5 12.3235
6 11.9161
7 11.1603
8 10.5979
9 10.5572
10 10.5544

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.6771
2 17.6218
3 17.2853
4 13.9442
5 12.9063
6 12.8655
7 12.4009
8 11.9707
9 11.8692
10 11.7210

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2121
2 0.2094
3 0.1945
4 0.1897
5 0.1807
6 0.1706
7 0.1659
8 0.1618
9 0.1614
10 0.1546

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1359
2 0.1257
3 0.1149
4 0.1116
5 0.1111
6 0.0988
7 0.0953
8 0.0898
9 0.0894
10 0.0880

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1524
2 0.1481
3 0.1383
4 0.1381
5 0.1218
6 0.1202
7 0.1120
8 0.1108
9 0.1095
10 0.1051


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek