Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sun Belt - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Western Ky. 1,579.5104 1,556.2049 1,567.8143 47.38 69.82 0.166
2nd Middle Tenn. 1,537.3067 1,515.6014 1,526.4155 49.40 63.88 0.150
3rd Arkansas St. 1,456.3964 1,437.4147 1,446.8744 43.95 62.44 0.052
4th FIU 1,441.2473 1,413.3344 1,427.2226 43.88 60.52 0.064
5th Denver 1,416.8902 1,412.7005 1,414.7938 43.84 58.80 0.031
6th North Texas 1,375.7854 1,353.4853 1,364.5898 38.93 57.92 -0.041
7th Troy 1,370.2623 1,347.5854 1,358.8765 42.57 54.59 -0.037
8th Little Rock 1,362.8937 1,351.3363 1,357.1027 40.45 57.61 -0.017
9th South Ala. 1,340.5533 1,340.8195 1,340.6864 39.56 56.65 -0.045
10th Louisiana 1,312.5598 1,313.6374 1,313.0985 37.01 55.89 -0.086
11th La.-Monroe 1,291.3692 1,279.0634 1,285.2016 36.98 51.80 -0.083
12th Fla. Atlantic 1,217.6588 1,223.4293 1,220.5406 35.23 49.53 -0.146

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Middle Tenn. 0.2963 45.45 15.83 42.33 37.27 6.31 5.39
2nd Western Ky. 0.2938 42.93 13.55 39.51 41.43 5.68 6.37
3rd Arkansas St. 0.2434 40.02 15.68 36.95 44.73 6.39 6.41
4th FIU 0.2432 38.94 14.62 36.42 47.60 5.48 4.47
5th Little Rock 0.1949 35.35 15.87 33.73 49.51 6.59 4.85
6th Denver 0.1863 35.61 16.98 33.46 48.21 5.59 5.54
7th South Ala. 0.1799 34.59 16.60 32.41 48.46 6.20 5.35
8th North Texas 0.1722 34.44 17.21 31.76 49.19 6.09 4.15
9th Troy 0.1682 31.48 14.66 29.25 54.62 5.20 5.21
10th Louisiana 0.1623 33.02 16.79 30.58 52.77 4.59 5.16
11th La.-Monroe 0.1423 30.62 16.39 28.64 56.17 5.15 3.89
12th Fla. Atlantic 0.0934 28.69 19.35 26.36 56.51 6.43 6.04

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Western Ky. 0.1275 30.09 17.34 27.41 54.94 6.90 3.54
2nd Middle Tenn. 0.1461 33.35 18.74 30.96 48.80 8.11 4.80
3rd Denver 0.1555 33.96 18.42 31.65 49.06 7.66 4.38
4th FIU 0.1794 33.61 15.67 31.15 52.12 6.08 4.41
5th Arkansas St. 0.1915 35.25 16.10 32.33 49.53 5.53 4.44
6th Troy 0.2049 36.06 15.58 33.87 49.40 5.20 5.45
7th Little Rock 0.2117 37.60 16.43 35.27 46.99 6.57 6.43
8th North Texas 0.2134 36.30 14.96 33.05 51.17 3.82 4.18
9th South Ala. 0.2248 37.11 14.63 33.88 48.93 4.74 5.25
10th La.-Monroe 0.2255 37.62 15.07 34.99 47.57 4.95 6.88
11th Fla. Atlantic 0.2395 40.14 16.18 37.30 43.62 6.34 8.40
12th Louisiana 0.2479 38.19 13.41 35.64 49.16 4.85 4.52

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,385.2681 1,383.4862 1,377.9056 1,377.2120 1,380.9679
Difference -1.7819 -7.3625 -8.0561 -5.7335

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Western Ky. 119 2,820 1,287 167 291 45.64 16.9 9.7 2,332 755 90 222 67.62 25.9 10.5
Middle Tenn. 115 2,665 1,286 131 217 48.26 20.3 12.3 2,321 912 117 221 60.71 19.8 10.5
Arkansas St. 118 2,695 1,220 178 280 45.27 15.1 9.6 2,396 903 104 237 62.31 23.0 10.1
FIU 106 2,381 1,046 107 221 43.93 22.3 10.8 2,265 915 101 201 59.60 22.4 11.3
La.-Monroe 104 1,942 907 96 166 46.70 20.2 11.7 1,924 882 138 185 54.16 13.9 10.4
Denver 112 2,450 1,053 133 210 42.98 18.4 11.7 2,418 1,028 101 200 57.49 23.9 12.1
Troy 115 2,477 1,098 132 137 44.33 18.8 18.1 2,473 1,096 132 225 55.68 18.7 11.0
South Ala. 99 2,180 908 124 221 41.65 17.6 9.9 2,216 951 114 197 57.09 19.4 11.2
North Texas 120 2,513 989 105 235 39.36 23.9 10.7 2,637 1,124 112 232 57.38 23.5 11.4
Louisiana 112 1,838 733 134 248 39.88 13.7 7.4 2,005 928 108 215 53.72 18.6 9.3
Little Rock 107 1,982 810 105 219 40.87 18.9 9.1 2,227 1,077 153 213 51.64 14.6 10.5
Fla. Atlantic 101 1,917 717 122 246 37.40 15.7 7.8 2,331 1,165 196 241 50.02 11.9 9.7
Conference Average 111 2,322 1,005 128 224 43.02 18.5 10.7 2,295 978 122 216 57.28 19.7 10.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sun Belt

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.01

2011-09-23 Bowling Green, Ky.
Western Ky.
Little Rock
3
2
19
25
24
26
25
20
25
23
15
13
GAME

70.67

2011-10-22 Troy, Ala.
Troy
North Texas
1
3
24
26
25
23
22
25
26
28
GAME

70.63

2011-10-04 Bowling Green, Ky.
Western Ky.
Middle Tenn.
1
3
26
24
19
25
22
25
16
25
GAME

69.90

2011-09-23 Murfreesboro, Tenn.
Middle Tenn.
Arkansas St.
2
3
25
23
14
25
28
30
25
19
18
20
GAME

69.83

2011-11-11 Murfreesboro, Tenn.
Middle Tenn.
Western Ky.
2
3
25
22
25
19
16
25
20
25
12
15
GAME

69.13

2011-10-21 Miami, Fla.
FIU
Arkansas St.
3
2
28
26
20
25
25
21
19
25
16
14
GAME

68.22

2011-10-01 Monroe, La.
La.-Monroe
Denver
2
3
25
23
25
22
24
26
18
25
13
15
GAME

67.45

2011-11-19 Miami, Fla.
Middle Tenn.
Western Ky.
1
3
22
25
25
12
18
25
18
25
GAME

67.08

2011-10-16 Murfreesboro, Tenn.
Middle Tenn.
FIU
3
0
25
23
25
21
25
16
GAME

66.82

2011-11-17 Miami, Fla.
FIU
Denver
3
1
25
21
23
25
25
21
25
18

HuskerGeek Sun Belt All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.9884
2 26.2621
3 24.3136
4 21.7912
5 20.2099
6 19.1431
7 18.4054
8 18.3271
9 18.2116
10 17.0976

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.2299
2 16.6767
3 14.2918
4 13.5331
5 13.2524
6 12.9753
7 12.4764
8 11.7382
9 10.9339
10 10.5748

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.2993
2 16.0905
3 15.7478
4 14.8180
5 14.7943
6 13.2868
7 12.5566
8 12.1973
9 10.3117
10 10.3033

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2546
2 0.2207
3 0.2043
4 0.2041
5 0.2023
6 0.1981
7 0.1761
8 0.1701
9 0.1695
10 0.1665

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1616
2 0.1573
3 0.1367
4 0.1247
5 0.1243
6 0.1205
7 0.1114
8 0.1111
9 0.1090
10 0.1057

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1417
2 0.1375
3 0.1358
4 0.1323
5 0.1322
6 0.1243
7 0.1232
8 0.1117
9 0.0991
10 0.0973


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek