Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sun Belt - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Coastal Caro. 1,660.5334 1,649.6509 1,655.0832 44.29 62.53 0.070
2nd Texas St. 1,651.4025 1,649.0564 1,650.2290 45.68 60.90 0.057
3rd Arkansas St. 1,627.5783 1,610.4826 1,619.0079 42.95 62.41 0.035
4th South Ala. 1,606.8185 1,585.0998 1,595.9222 43.95 58.21 0.015
5th Louisiana 1,584.8616 1,585.8756 1,585.3685 42.48 58.03 -0.006
6th UT Arlington 1,549.5437 1,527.8692 1,538.6683 39.63 57.39 -0.031
7th Little Rock 1,539.0438 1,523.7318 1,531.3687 40.41 54.89 -0.033
8th Appalachian St. 1,532.6198 1,517.0380 1,524.8090 39.02 55.83 -0.079
9th Troy 1,495.2315 1,499.4023 1,497.3154 36.15 54.26 -0.100
10th Ga. Southern 1,502.6083 1,484.5178 1,493.5357 36.77 53.30 -0.086
11th Georgia St. 1,484.6609 1,458.1885 1,471.3651 38.33 50.76 -0.107
12th La.-Monroe 1,464.7664 1,453.7360 1,459.2408 35.97 50.01 -0.137

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Coastal Caro. 0.2485 39.05 14.20 36.54 46.73 4.99 5.95
2nd Arkansas St. 0.2244 37.48 15.04 34.84 48.28 5.21 5.36
3rd Texas St. 0.2187 37.79 15.91 35.64 46.23 6.05 5.22
4th Louisiana 0.2046 33.37 12.90 31.44 55.21 4.64 4.09
5th South Ala. 0.1945 34.31 14.86 31.25 50.97 6.30 5.56
6th UT Arlington 0.1929 36.42 17.13 33.81 47.75 6.53 4.99
7th Little Rock 0.1857 33.19 14.62 29.70 53.01 5.20 5.13
8th Appalachian St. 0.1691 33.50 16.59 31.69 52.21 5.66 4.36
9th Ga. Southern 0.1659 32.97 16.38 31.32 52.83 7.08 5.51
10th Troy 0.1602 35.80 19.78 33.55 44.96 7.98 5.79
11th Georgia St. 0.1410 30.61 16.51 28.85 54.31 5.70 6.08
12th La.-Monroe 0.1338 30.68 17.30 28.14 53.92 6.41 6.04

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Texas St. 0.1622 31.39 15.17 29.31 55.23 5.78 4.15
2nd Coastal Caro. 0.1788 33.99 16.10 31.66 51.45 6.70 5.52
3rd South Ala. 0.1790 35.07 17.17 33.05 48.48 6.85 4.45
4th Arkansas St. 0.1897 35.16 16.19 32.98 50.37 6.08 3.58
5th Louisiana 0.2110 36.09 14.99 33.90 50.26 6.16 4.39
6th Little Rock 0.2182 36.74 14.92 34.51 48.37 6.27 6.12
7th UT Arlington 0.2241 36.45 14.04 33.72 49.61 4.21 5.81
8th Appalachian St. 0.2479 38.51 13.72 35.94 49.24 4.40 5.40
9th Georgia St. 0.2479 38.41 13.62 35.79 49.16 4.87 6.97
10th Ga. Southern 0.2521 40.95 15.75 38.08 44.09 6.24 6.59
11th Troy 0.2600 39.88 13.89 36.00 46.02 5.74 5.03
12th La.-Monroe 0.2704 40.35 13.31 36.53 46.22 4.65 8.11

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,551.8261 1,550.7590 1,548.2495 1,545.5753 1,549.1025
Difference -1.0672 -3.5767 -6.2508 -3.6316

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Coastal Caro. 106 2,410 1,063 132 232 44.11 18.3 10.4 2,191 838 115 201 61.75 19.1 10.9
Texas St. 126 2,866 1,309 140 210 45.67 20.5 13.6 2,620 1,049 103 204 59.96 25.4 12.8
Arkansas St. 122 2,813 1,209 147 227 42.98 19.1 12.4 2,628 1,010 86 217 61.57 30.6 12.1
South Ala. 100 2,242 1,013 123 156 45.18 18.2 14.4 2,099 867 91 205 58.70 23.1 10.2
Louisiana 121 2,752 1,225 116 187 44.51 23.7 14.7 2,602 1,066 108 226 59.03 24.1 11.5
UT Arlington 113 2,423 1,007 121 201 41.56 20.0 12.1 2,429 1,018 140 252 58.09 17.4 9.6
Little Rock 112 2,379 1,006 123 208 42.29 19.3 11.4 2,462 1,098 145 186 55.40 17.0 13.2
Appalachian St. 134 2,855 1,161 126 213 40.67 22.7 13.4 3,005 1,308 158 265 56.47 19.0 11.3
Troy 126 2,656 1,055 167 359 39.72 15.9 7.4 2,846 1,252 139 228 56.01 20.5 12.5
Ga. Southern 106 2,227 893 130 212 40.10 17.1 10.5 2,418 1,090 151 214 54.92 16.0 11.3
Georgia St. 117 2,373 991 153 221 41.76 15.5 10.7 2,603 1,235 172 200 52.56 15.1 13.0
La.-Monroe 114 2,244 885 143 173 39.44 15.7 13.0 2,573 1,254 200 208 51.26 12.9 12.4
Conference Average 116 2,520 1,068 135 217 42.33 18.8 12.0 2,540 1,090 134 217 57.14 20.0 11.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sun Belt

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

77.78

2017-10-15 Boone, N.C.
Appalachian St.
Coastal Caro.
2
3
25
23
25
22
25
27
21
25
13
15
GAME

77.51

2017-10-13 Little Rock, Ark.
Little Rock
Louisiana
2
3
25
27
23
25
25
23
25
23
12
15
GAME

77.25

2017-09-29 Lafayette, La.
Louisiana
Arkansas St.
3
2
25
20
13
25
24
26
28
26
15
11
GAME

76.58

2017-11-19 Jonesboro, Ark.
Coastal Caro.
Texas St.
3
1
25
23
23
25
25
23
25
15
GAME

75.74

2017-10-28 Lafayette, La.
Louisiana
Texas St.
3
2
25
27
25
23
25
12
21
25
15
8
GAME

75.66

2017-10-09 Jonesboro, Arkansas
Arkansas St.
Little Rock
3
1
25
16
25
19
29
31
25
21
GAME

75.14

2017-10-21 Lafayette, La.
Louisiana
Coastal Caro.
2
3
22
25
25
17
16
25
25
22
12
15
GAME

75.13

2017-11-03 Mobile, Ala.
South Ala.
Louisiana
1
3
26
24
23
25
22
25
25
27
GAME

74.71

2017-11-18 Jonesboro, Ark.
Arkansas St.
Coastal Caro.
1
3
25
22
21
25
23
25
20
25
GAME

74.15

2017-11-06 Arlington, Texas
UT Arlington
Texas St.
2
3
28
26
25
17
8
25
21
25
11
15

HuskerGeek Sun Belt All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 28.5350
2 26.9106
3 24.3769
4 23.6272
5 22.1898
6 21.8107
7 21.2850
8 21.2753
9 19.9588
10 19.4833

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.7293
2 15.4145
3 15.3506
4 13.4074
5 12.4562
6 12.2584
7 11.8501
8 11.8168
9 11.7860
10 11.6297

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.4676
2 19.5417
3 18.6309
4 17.4756
5 16.2222
6 16.1899
7 15.0753
8 13.6966
9 13.3141
10 12.7777

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2539
2 0.2195
3 0.1972
4 0.1966
5 0.1953
6 0.1947
7 0.1913
8 0.1884
9 0.1758
10 0.1649

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1490
2 0.1454
3 0.1287
4 0.1269
5 0.1095
6 0.1074
7 0.1058
8 0.1028
9 0.0986
10 0.0982

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1692
2 0.1615
3 0.1533
4 0.1479
5 0.1446
6 0.1355
7 0.1346
8 0.1305
9 0.1220
10 0.1132


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek