Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sun Belt - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Texas St. 1,685.1067 1,648.9851 1,666.9481 51.82 60.23 0.097
2nd Coastal Caro. 1,623.4598 1,590.7155 1,607.0042 49.07 58.16 0.082
3rd South Alabama 1,592.4718 1,552.9273 1,572.5752 47.33 53.83 0.007
4th Troy 1,586.2512 1,551.5758 1,568.8177 45.78 54.88 -0.004
5th Arkansas St. 1,577.2587 1,548.1021 1,562.6124 47.60 52.17 0.002
6th Louisiana 1,580.2690 1,540.8269 1,560.4234 45.08 56.80 0.005
7th UT Arlington 1,575.0956 1,539.1290 1,557.0084 47.45 52.85 0.025
8th Appalachian St. 1,558.8095 1,523.9942 1,541.3036 44.29 53.52 -0.025
9th Georgia St. 1,502.7471 1,466.9592 1,484.7453 42.34 52.54 -0.054
10th Ga. Southern 1,478.4063 1,448.1886 1,463.2194 47.14 47.24 -0.064
11th La.-Monroe 1,444.6104 1,409.8864 1,427.1428 43.65 47.59 -0.108
12th Little Rock 1,438.6436 1,403.1741 1,420.7982 42.15 46.12 -0.116

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Coastal Caro. 0.2933 41.52 12.19 38.81 43.14 5.57 8.87
2nd Texas St. 0.2492 39.88 14.97 37.01 45.25 5.40 7.44
3rd UT Arlington 0.2358 37.59 14.01 34.61 46.98 6.40 4.64
4th South Alabama 0.2275 36.66 13.92 32.76 44.32 6.30 5.90
5th Troy 0.2057 37.92 17.36 35.62 41.78 8.65 6.68
6th Appalachian St. 0.2053 36.30 15.77 33.28 48.75 5.99 6.66
7th Louisiana 0.1957 32.54 12.97 30.12 53.71 5.30 5.28
8th Arkansas St. 0.1952 35.47 15.94 31.92 48.89 5.74 6.43
9th Ga. Southern 0.1666 31.77 15.11 29.42 55.20 5.47 5.67
10th La.-Monroe 0.1550 30.60 15.11 28.16 56.40 5.35 6.06
11th Georgia St. 0.1541 32.51 17.10 30.37 51.96 6.31 6.02
12th Little Rock 0.1410 30.24 16.14 28.04 53.94 5.80 5.96

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Texas St. 0.1525 32.28 17.03 29.92 53.15 5.88 5.49
2nd Louisiana 0.1908 32.89 13.81 30.85 53.80 4.78 5.71
3rd Arkansas St. 0.1933 34.08 14.75 31.65 50.57 5.95 5.35
4th Georgia St. 0.2077 35.41 14.63 32.66 49.20 5.66 7.09
5th Troy 0.2099 35.52 14.54 33.40 50.72 5.27 5.38
6th UT Arlington 0.2111 35.66 14.55 33.00 48.92 5.78 6.31
7th Coastal Caro. 0.2116 36.39 15.23 33.47 45.81 6.78 6.53
8th South Alabama 0.2207 35.74 13.67 32.04 45.77 5.11 6.38
9th Ga. Southern 0.2301 37.44 14.43 33.69 48.76 4.91 9.06
10th Appalachian St. 0.2303 37.46 14.43 34.77 49.33 5.26 6.02
11th Little Rock 0.2572 38.32 12.60 35.17 46.62 4.58 7.26
12th La.-Monroe 0.2631 39.69 13.38 36.38 47.78 4.67 6.82

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,536.0499 1,534.4853 1,538.8382 1,545.8185 1,538.7979
Difference -1.5646 2.7883 9.7686 3.6641

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Texas St. 111 2,068 1,089 172 233 52.66 12.0 8.9 1,698 706 120 232 58.42 14.2 7.3
Coastal Caro. 108 2,515 1,276 221 295 50.74 11.4 8.5 2,214 950 132 209 57.09 16.8 10.6
Troy 112 2,577 1,277 173 281 49.55 14.9 9.2 2,403 1,079 125 239 55.10 19.2 10.1
South Alabama 114 2,471 1,244 157 192 50.34 15.7 12.9 2,269 1,048 141 267 53.81 16.1 8.5
Louisiana 110 2,446 1,205 118 193 49.26 20.7 12.7 2,303 1,041 127 218 54.80 18.1 10.6
UT Arlington 124 2,656 1,316 115 169 49.55 23.1 15.7 2,560 1,244 154 213 51.41 16.6 12.0
Arkansas St. 111 2,415 1,199 153 180 49.65 15.8 13.4 2,291 1,122 109 181 51.03 21.0 12.7
La.-Monroe 112 2,366 1,176 156 213 49.70 15.2 11.1 2,512 1,302 153 166 48.17 16.4 15.1
Appalachian St. 116 2,365 1,076 166 256 45.50 14.2 9.2 2,401 1,152 146 206 52.02 16.4 11.7
Georgia St. 105 2,246 1,001 133 204 44.57 16.9 11.0 2,392 1,150 163 186 51.92 14.7 12.9
Ga. Southern 101 1,908 944 106 184 49.48 18.0 10.4 2,103 1,115 191 206 46.98 11.0 10.2
Little Rock 95 1,829 806 104 152 44.07 17.6 12.0 2,212 1,214 150 180 45.12 14.7 12.3
Conference Average 110 2,322 1,134 148 213 48.76 16.3 11.3 2,280 1,094 143 209 52.16 16.3 11.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sun Belt

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.20

2019-11-15
Coastal Caro.
Troy
3
1
36
38
25
19
29
27
25
18
GAME

74.46

2019-10-18
Texas St.
Troy
3
0
37
35
25
16
25
13
GAME

74.28

2019-10-04
Arkansas St.
Texas St.
3
2
25
23
25
22
16
25
21
25
15
6
GAME

73.95

2019-09-27
Texas St.
Louisiana
3
1
25
23
21
25
25
13
25
20
GAME

73.66

2019-10-04 Lafayette, La.
Louisiana
Appalachian St.
2
3
25
17
25
13
28
30
23
25
14
16
GAME

73.08

2019-11-01 Lafayette, La.
Louisiana
UT Arlington
2
3
25
21
19
25
29
27
20
25
11
15
GAME

73.03

2019-10-11
South Alabama
Louisiana
3
1
25
18
26
24
14
25
25
20
GAME

72.93

2019-11-08
UT Arlington
Arkansas St.
2
3
18
25
25
15
25
16
22
25
13
15
GAME

72.83

2019-11-15
Appalachian St.
South Alabama
3
1
20
25
25
22
25
20
25
17
GAME

72.82

2019-10-19
Texas St.
South Alabama
3
1
25
7
22
25
25
20
25
18

HuskerGeek Sun Belt All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.6051
2 24.5869
3 21.5538
4 20.5610
5 20.3867
6 19.1660
7 18.9946
8 18.3762
9 18.2682
10 18.1835

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.1425
2 17.1346
3 15.4476
4 14.4829
5 12.9687
6 12.4106
7 11.5648
8 11.1519
9 10.3328
10 10.3163

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.5765
2 17.5527
3 15.8385
4 14.0498
5 13.3150
6 13.0977
7 12.6529
8 11.8069
9 11.3476
10 10.7171

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2535
2 0.2375
3 0.2006
4 0.1996
5 0.1986
6 0.1942
7 0.1940
8 0.1879
9 0.1800
10 0.1784

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1766
2 0.1620
3 0.1471
4 0.1341
5 0.1201
6 0.1157
7 0.1150
8 0.1149
9 0.1147
10 0.1108

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1627
2 0.1538
3 0.1526
4 0.1377
5 0.1364
6 0.1191
7 0.1189
8 0.1183
9 0.1146
10 0.1123


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek