Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sun Belt - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Texas St. 1,529.7490 1,533.8786 1,531.8124 50.22 57.83 0.103
2nd South Alabama 1,521.9740 1,525.9693 1,523.9704 52.60 54.42 0.079
3rd James Madison 1,509.6505 1,510.1286 1,509.8896 50.67 56.00 0.075
4th Coastal Carolina 1,462.1972 1,472.1483 1,467.1643 76.66 82.85 0.221
5th Louisiana 1,455.0465 1,465.3258 1,460.1771 47.25 53.94 0.021
6th Troy 1,457.6622 1,460.9410 1,459.3007 48.12 52.87 0.018
7th Southern Miss. 1,449.6853 1,455.2275 1,452.4538 47.91 52.58 -0.007
8th App State 1,448.4519 1,451.6653 1,450.0577 50.00 52.31 0.007
9th Ga. Southern 1,441.3659 1,448.0613 1,444.7097 50.93 50.75 -0.002
10th Old Dominion 1,411.4222 1,416.6839 1,414.0506 47.63 49.85 -0.008
11th Arkansas St. 1,383.2379 1,387.8615 1,385.5478 48.04 46.55 -0.066
12th Marshall 1,360.7698 1,369.2522 1,365.0044 45.84 48.02 -0.046
13th Georgia St. 1,344.4054 1,351.9175 1,348.1562 46.35 46.90 -0.058
14th ULM 1,323.9783 1,330.7410 1,327.3554 45.76 45.76 -0.107

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Coastal Carolina 0.3914 42.76 3.62 39.25 42.75 4.31 9.73
2nd Texas St. 0.3038 43.40 13.02 40.64 43.18 5.35 6.86
3rd James Madison 0.2707 39.71 12.64 36.43 45.01 5.89 7.63
4th South Alabama 0.2444 37.58 13.14 34.50 48.16 5.85 6.29
5th Southern Miss. 0.2228 36.59 14.31 32.99 47.53 5.91 7.12
6th Troy 0.2220 39.15 16.95 36.38 42.84 8.19 7.16
7th Old Dominion 0.2189 37.02 15.12 34.07 48.65 5.36 7.10
8th App State 0.2137 34.59 13.22 32.11 49.49 5.94 7.40
9th Louisiana 0.2091 35.57 14.65 33.26 49.96 5.55 6.05
10th Marshall 0.2062 35.32 14.71 32.48 50.57 5.23 4.45
11th Ga. Southern 0.1932 33.82 14.50 31.55 52.36 6.08 7.64
12th Arkansas St. 0.1732 33.95 16.63 31.34 51.52 6.10 6.05
13th Georgia St. 0.1684 32.64 15.80 30.21 54.51 6.09 6.86
14th ULM 0.1597 29.62 13.65 27.67 51.16 6.19 5.35

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st South Alabama 0.1651 33.06 16.55 30.79 51.86 6.91 5.40
2nd Coastal Carolina 0.1706 28.55 11.49 26.68 55.85 7.27 5.04
3rd Louisiana 0.1883 34.93 16.10 32.51 49.65 6.52 6.21
4th Ga. Southern 0.1949 35.18 15.69 32.54 50.60 5.72 5.95
5th James Madison 0.1961 36.80 17.19 34.53 47.71 7.95 5.59
6th Texas St. 0.2005 35.26 15.20 33.14 51.62 5.76 6.63
7th Troy 0.2035 35.61 15.26 32.86 50.12 5.66 7.36
8th App State 0.2064 36.79 16.15 33.81 45.45 5.59 6.78
9th Georgia St. 0.2266 38.20 15.54 34.59 47.56 6.51 8.06
10th Old Dominion 0.2268 38.66 15.99 35.92 45.29 6.84 8.51
11th Southern Miss. 0.2294 36.29 13.34 33.41 49.15 4.72 5.68
12th Arkansas St. 0.2395 38.57 14.62 35.88 47.68 4.75 7.31
13th Marshall 0.2523 38.87 13.64 36.13 46.72 5.45 7.72
14th ULM 0.2665 38.48 11.83 35.90 42.62 3.69 7.90

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,438.5464 1,440.0402 1,440.8356 1,441.6827 1,440.2762
Difference 1.4938 2.2891 3.1363 2.3064

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
James Madison 107 2,404 1,216 191 206 50.58 12.6 11.7 2,213 984 125 184 55.54 17.7 12.0
Texas St. 119 2,732 1,336 174 249 48.90 15.7 11.0 2,439 1,044 162 249 57.20 15.1 9.8
Ga. Southern 102 2,258 1,203 188 214 53.28 12.0 10.6 2,082 1,004 123 223 51.78 16.9 9.3
App State 114 2,537 1,308 195 208 51.56 13.0 12.2 2,350 1,096 152 218 53.36 15.5 10.8
South Alabama 118 2,676 1,363 162 224 50.93 16.5 11.9 2,445 1,129 130 210 53.82 18.8 11.6
Southern Miss. 127 2,867 1,405 215 282 49.01 13.3 10.2 2,730 1,288 155 284 52.82 17.6 9.6
Louisiana 111 2,401 1,127 147 213 46.94 16.3 11.3 2,363 1,103 148 232 53.32 16.0 10.2
Troy 123 2,679 1,280 187 319 47.78 14.3 8.4 2,611 1,244 191 252 52.36 13.7 10.4
Old Dominion 106 2,279 1,099 162 237 48.22 14.1 9.6 2,330 1,164 199 216 50.04 11.7 10.8
Arkansas St. 118 2,396 1,195 164 205 49.88 14.6 11.7 2,509 1,328 188 249 47.07 13.3 10.1
Georgia St. 110 2,344 1,137 177 254 48.51 13.2 9.2 2,534 1,324 203 218 47.75 12.5 11.6
ULM 122 2,457 1,194 148 185 48.60 16.6 13.3 2,746 1,461 209 211 46.80 13.1 13.0
Marshall 114 2,293 1,072 115 142 46.75 19.9 16.1 2,489 1,284 200 241 48.41 12.4 10.3
Conference Average 115 2,486 1,226 171 226 49.30 14.8 11.3 2,449 1,189 168 230 51.56 14.9 10.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sun Belt

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.65

2022-11-19 Foley, AL
Texas St.
South Alabama
3
2
15
25
25
19
25
19
23
25
16
14
GAME

74.14

2022-09-30
Texas St.
James Madison
2
3
24
26
25
19
21
25
25
22
11
15
GAME

73.55

2022-10-22
South Alabama
Texas St.
3
2
21
25
25
20
22
25
25
21
15
7
GAME

73.31

2022-09-24
Southern Miss.
South Alabama
3
2
19
25
25
23
25
22
12
25
16
14
GAME

72.13

2022-10-21
South Alabama
Texas St.
1
3
15
25
19
25
25
23
29
31
GAME

71.95

2022-11-20 Foley, AL
James Madison
Texas St.
3
1
25
19
22
25
25
22
25
21
GAME

70.76

2022-11-04
App State
Ga. Southern
3
2
25
23
20
25
22
25
25
22
15
11
GAME

70.74

2022-10-14
Arkansas St.
Troy
1
3
20
25
23
25
28
26
23
25
GAME

70.28

2022-09-23
Southern Miss.
South Alabama
1
3
21
25
25
21
21
25
26
28
GAME

70.15

2022-11-12
James Madison
South Alabama
3
0
28
26
25
22
25
23

HuskerGeek Sun Belt All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 28.3988
2 28.0010
3 27.3323
4 27.1925
5 26.7912
6 25.8902
7 24.8907
8 23.3132
9 22.5943
10 21.0758

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.3251
2 17.8693
3 17.8026
4 17.2431
5 16.7786
6 16.2405
7 14.1811
8 13.8616
9 13.5124
10 12.8567

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.7907
2 16.0613
3 15.2664
4 14.5049
5 13.8881
6 13.8335
7 13.0325
8 13.0114
9 12.4505
10 11.7222

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2407
2 0.2393
3 0.2324
4 0.2259
5 0.2251
6 0.2205
7 0.2100
8 0.2039
9 0.1982
10 0.1935

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1562
2 0.1514
3 0.1514
4 0.1496
5 0.1358
6 0.1338
7 0.1321
8 0.1295
9 0.1267
10 0.1212

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1480
2 0.1474
3 0.1426
4 0.1316
5 0.1305
6 0.1272
7 0.1187
8 0.1138
9 0.1132
10 0.1112


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek