Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sunshine State - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Tampa 1,671.8779 1,645.1848 1,658.4776 57.04 71.74 0.283
2nd Saint Leo 1,571.6565 1,561.3173 1,566.4784 50.83 66.97 0.186
3rd Eckerd 1,564.1195 1,550.4057 1,557.2475 52.95 63.69 0.161
4th Fla. Southern 1,559.4680 1,537.8044 1,548.5983 52.54 64.72 0.165
5th Rollins 1,549.9781 1,533.7977 1,541.8667 51.81 64.00 0.145
6th Lynn 1,475.9872 1,464.4332 1,470.1989 46.71 59.92 0.063
7th Florida Tech 1,479.5756 1,460.4550 1,469.9842 50.39 57.50 0.070
8th Barry 1,462.9247 1,463.9734 1,463.4490 46.95 60.12 0.057
9th Nova Southeastern 1,385.0409 1,400.8665 1,392.9312 43.04 56.18 -0.031

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Tampa 0.3556 47.66 12.10 44.26 39.67 2.62 7.58
2nd Saint Leo 0.2940 43.89 14.49 41.44 42.32 3.78 7.86
3rd Eckerd 0.2677 40.26 13.49 37.16 47.01 4.12 7.47
4th Fla. Southern 0.2539 37.18 11.79 34.68 50.60 3.34 7.08
5th Rollins 0.2518 38.26 13.07 34.64 47.13 4.01 6.02
6th Lynn 0.2239 36.18 13.79 33.48 50.40 4.71 7.01
7th Barry 0.2212 36.62 14.50 34.03 49.85 4.74 8.66
8th Florida Tech 0.2004 36.23 16.20 33.95 48.29 5.63 7.98
9th Nova Southeastern 0.1677 35.08 18.31 32.74 50.28 4.74 7.56

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Tampa 0.0722 26.64 19.42 24.60 57.22 8.86 4.00
2nd Fla. Southern 0.0889 25.04 16.14 22.92 62.17 5.66 4.04
3rd Eckerd 0.1063 29.18 18.55 27.19 55.31 7.88 4.40
4th Rollins 0.1072 26.89 16.16 25.19 57.47 5.83 4.87
5th Saint Leo 0.1076 28.76 18.00 26.64 57.16 5.98 4.82
6th Florida Tech 0.1308 29.45 16.37 27.74 56.36 6.34 6.25
7th Lynn 0.1606 31.65 15.59 29.35 53.64 5.70 5.07
8th Barry 0.1640 33.31 16.91 30.45 52.42 5.80 5.83
9th Nova Southeastern 0.1990 36.31 16.41 33.11 49.84 5.67 5.15

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,518.8035 1,516.8318 1,517.5791 1,520.2213 1,518.3589
Difference -1.9717 -1.2244 1.4178 -0.5928

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Tampa 117 2,778 1,412 171 208 50.83 16.2 13.4 2,169 767 108 183 64.64 20.1 11.9
Saint Leo 113 2,615 1,239 187 278 47.38 14.0 9.4 2,263 865 131 205 61.78 17.3 11.0
Rollins 121 2,799 1,332 143 164 47.59 19.6 17.1 2,527 1,046 153 217 58.61 16.5 11.6
Eckerd 105 2,378 1,123 148 192 47.23 16.1 12.4 2,213 944 125 169 57.34 17.7 13.1
Fla. Southern 127 2,900 1,346 169 268 46.41 17.2 10.8 2,690 1,129 135 196 58.03 19.9 13.7
Lynn 119 2,650 1,187 175 234 44.79 15.1 11.3 2,601 1,138 157 226 56.25 16.6 11.5
Florida Tech 101 2,203 1,031 156 165 46.80 14.1 13.4 2,208 1,045 156 185 52.67 14.2 11.9
Barry 97 1,760 733 166 224 41.65 10.6 7.9 1,889 873 145 195 53.79 13.0 9.7
Nova Southeastern 92 1,801 705 123 162 39.15 14.6 11.1 2,123 1,043 134 194 50.87 15.8 10.9
Conference Average 110 2,432 1,123 160 211 45.76 15.3 11.9 2,298 983 138 197 57.11 16.8 11.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sunshine State

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.23

2013-10-25 Lakeland, FL
Fla. Southern
Tampa
0
3
11
25
25
27
27
29
GAME

74.01

2013-11-22 Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.
Nova Southeastern
Tampa
2
3
13
25
25
20
15
25
31
29
12
15
GAME

73.16

2013-11-09 Winter Park, Fla.
Rollins
Eckerd
1
3
23
25
25
23
18
25
23
25
GAME

73.08

2013-11-15 Winter Park, Fla.
Rollins
Fla. Southern
3
1
25
22
16
25
25
20
25
20
GAME

72.51

2013-10-09 St. Peterburg, Fla.
Eckerd
Saint Leo
1
3
25
27
27
25
19
25
22
25
GAME

72.45

2013-10-04 Saint Leo, Fla.
Saint Leo
Tampa
2
3
15
25
25
19
23
25
25
19
12
15
GAME

71.59

2013-10-02 St. Petersburg, Fla.
Eckerd
Fla. Southern
3
0
25
22
27
25
25
22
GAME

71.54

2013-12-05 Tampa, Fla.
Fla. Southern
Saint Leo
3
2
29
27
25
21
23
25
19
25
15
11
GAME

71.51

2013-11-08 Winter Park, Fla.
Rollins
Saint Leo
3
2
25
27
16
25
25
18
25
23
15
11
GAME

71.34

2013-09-24 Lakeland, FL
Fla. Southern
Saint Leo
3
1
25
19
22
25
25
23
25
23

HuskerGeek Sunshine State All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.8625
2 24.2069
3 22.2772
4 21.2000
5 21.0034
6 20.7475
7 20.4733
8 20.2543
9 19.9508
10 19.8336

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.2821
2 16.1171
3 15.7037
4 13.7777
5 12.9191
6 12.0959
7 12.0399
8 10.6289
9 9.9066
10 9.2142

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.4997
2 18.9960
3 17.8789
4 16.3107
5 15.3356
6 14.5341
7 13.8243
8 11.7183
9 11.6484
10 10.7454

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2122
2 0.2115
3 0.2051
4 0.1876
5 0.1736
6 0.1711
7 0.1698
8 0.1677
9 0.1674
10 0.1652

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1346
2 0.1331
3 0.1269
4 0.1241
5 0.1143
6 0.1043
7 0.1012
8 0.0995
9 0.0968
10 0.0840

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1570
2 0.1535
3 0.1528
4 0.1518
5 0.1469
6 0.1201
7 0.1160
8 0.1109
9 0.1106
10 0.1067


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek