Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sunshine State - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Tampa 1,739.0133 1,716.5356 1,727.7379 58.13 75.62 0.353
2nd Fla. Southern 1,679.2472 1,660.0407 1,669.6163 57.97 69.18 0.264
3rd Saint Leo 1,560.5570 1,551.6663 1,556.1053 50.95 63.22 0.138
4th Lynn 1,542.5978 1,539.4882 1,541.0422 47.11 65.06 0.118
5th Rollins 1,526.5919 1,514.7995 1,520.6843 50.24 61.33 0.089
6th Barry 1,518.1145 1,508.7750 1,513.4376 48.10 62.07 0.112
7th Eckerd 1,491.3896 1,488.4026 1,489.8954 47.24 61.09 0.096
8th Nova Southeastern 1,471.6494 1,469.1533 1,470.4008 46.74 59.27 0.074
9th Florida Tech 1,437.1190 1,439.2770 1,438.1976 44.96 57.03 0.029

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Tampa 0.4114 51.52 10.38 47.63 38.19 2.42 6.24
2nd Fla. Southern 0.3166 41.19 9.52 38.09 48.77 2.67 8.37
3rd Saint Leo 0.2558 40.22 14.64 37.92 46.45 3.93 6.94
4th Eckerd 0.2520 39.71 14.51 37.39 46.14 3.28 8.12
5th Lynn 0.2471 39.25 14.55 36.27 46.46 4.18 7.02
6th Barry 0.2461 38.98 14.37 36.17 46.56 4.55 7.36
7th Rollins 0.2235 38.46 16.11 36.11 46.45 4.69 5.78
8th Nova Southeastern 0.2207 35.05 12.98 31.29 52.98 2.66 7.59
9th Florida Tech 0.1826 35.02 16.76 32.64 48.69 4.17 6.28

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Fla. Southern 0.0531 23.70 18.40 22.35 63.25 7.25 4.42
2nd Tampa 0.0586 25.62 19.76 24.03 58.68 7.88 3.82
3rd Saint Leo 0.1177 29.32 17.56 27.11 57.67 5.62 4.17
4th Lynn 0.1288 31.00 18.12 29.01 52.69 6.90 4.14
5th Barry 0.1336 30.65 17.29 28.26 54.20 6.19 5.56
6th Rollins 0.1346 29.02 15.56 27.03 58.22 5.58 4.19
7th Nova Southeastern 0.1464 31.65 17.01 28.80 52.60 6.59 5.74
8th Florida Tech 0.1532 31.68 16.36 29.68 52.34 6.28 7.33
9th Eckerd 0.1562 32.62 17.00 30.33 53.43 6.31 5.67

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,547.4575 1,537.3117 1,524.2330 1,525.0547 1,533.5142
Difference -10.1458 -23.2245 -22.4028 -18.5910

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Tampa 117 2,836 1,428 136 243 50.35 20.9 11.7 2,145 695 104 188 67.60 20.6 11.4
Fla. Southern 108 2,543 1,279 175 211 50.30 14.5 12.1 2,083 792 110 185 61.98 18.9 11.3
Lynn 97 2,123 937 147 223 44.14 14.4 9.5 1,995 798 98 175 60.00 20.4 11.4
Saint Leo 121 2,613 1,162 166 234 44.47 15.7 11.2 2,566 1,113 140 261 56.63 18.3 9.8
Rollins 121 2,434 1,098 133 137 45.11 18.3 17.8 2,391 1,061 140 219 55.63 17.1 10.9
Barry 102 1,934 846 151 234 43.74 12.8 8.3 1,918 834 146 203 56.52 13.1 9.4
Eckerd 112 2,418 1,037 177 268 42.89 13.7 9.0 2,467 1,093 160 173 55.70 15.4 14.3
Nova Southeastern 103 2,187 934 152 222 42.71 14.4 9.9 2,302 1,046 153 207 54.56 15.0 11.1
Florida Tech 109 2,196 900 121 227 40.98 18.1 9.7 2,437 1,161 204 210 52.36 11.9 11.6
Conference Average 110 2,365 1,069 151 222 44.97 15.9 11.0 2,256 955 139 202 57.88 16.8 11.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sunshine State

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

76.30

2014-10-31 Lakeland, FL
Fla. Southern
Tampa
1
3
22
25
18
25
25
22
20
25
GAME

74.79

2014-09-27 Tampa, Fla.
Tampa
Fla. Southern
3
1
25
22
15
25
25
20
25
12
GAME

74.64

2014-10-24 Boca Raton, Fla.
Lynn
Fla. Southern
1
3
27
25
17
25
21
25
20
25
GAME

73.55

2014-11-01 Saint Leo, Fla.
Saint Leo
Tampa
0
3
26
28
21
25
15
25
GAME

73.39

2014-11-11 Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.
Nova Southeastern
Barry
3
1
25
23
30
32
25
22
25
17
GAME

73.14

2014-09-20 Miami Shores, Fla.
Barry
Rollins
2
3
26
24
26
24
23
25
21
25
18
20
GAME

72.35

2014-11-12 Saint Leo, Fla.
Saint Leo
Fla. Southern
1
3
25
19
18
25
19
25
20
25
GAME

72.10

2014-09-24 St. Petersburg, Fla.
Eckerd
Rollins
2
3
27
25
20
25
27
29
25
21
16
18
GAME

71.70

2014-11-08 Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.
Nova Southeastern
Saint Leo
3
1
31
29
25
17
21
25
25
16
GAME

71.66

2014-10-07 Lakeland, FL
Fla. Southern
Saint Leo
3
1
25
15
22
25
26
24
25
15

HuskerGeek Sunshine State All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 25.9215
2 24.7716
3 23.1696
4 21.8721
5 19.0144
6 18.8219
7 18.3422
8 17.6371
9 16.5647
10 16.5288

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.6599
2 16.2850
3 13.4518
4 12.5443
5 11.6509
6 11.5511
7 10.6580
8 9.6186
9 9.5936
10 9.5769

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 22.2111
2 17.5647
3 14.3625
4 14.0551
5 13.6405
6 12.4543
7 11.9287
8 11.1981
9 10.8564
10 10.6862

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2314
2 0.2294
3 0.1964
4 0.1886
5 0.1781
6 0.1761
7 0.1759
8 0.1712
9 0.1656
10 0.1630

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1508
2 0.1487
3 0.1218
4 0.1160
5 0.1031
6 0.0998
7 0.0996
8 0.0971
9 0.0962
10 0.0952

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1882
2 0.1626
3 0.1533
4 0.1428
5 0.1330
6 0.1311
7 0.1255
8 0.1094
9 0.1087
10 0.1000


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek