Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sunshine State - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Palm Beach Atl. 1,627.3389 1,632.8566 1,630.0954 52.80 68.12 0.184
2nd Tampa 1,594.2694 1,600.0529 1,597.1585 50.94 65.74 0.167
3rd Fla. Southern 1,571.6455 1,573.2472 1,572.4461 49.59 65.71 0.130
4th Saint Leo 1,563.7802 1,567.4491 1,565.6136 50.19 64.35 0.133
5th Lynn 1,553.4362 1,559.2835 1,556.3571 49.01 63.78 0.116
6th Barry 1,529.8984 1,537.9423 1,533.9151 47.96 62.32 0.121
7th Nova Southeastern 1,528.7302 1,531.4985 1,530.1137 47.99 62.49 0.093
8th Eckerd 1,509.6180 1,512.5650 1,511.0908 46.62 62.21 0.080
9th Rollins 1,499.6972 1,497.6517 1,498.6741 47.73 60.43 0.063
10th Embry-Riddle (FL) 1,495.9739 1,499.2630 1,497.6176 48.98 59.64 0.080
11th Florida Tech 1,445.6421 1,459.3577 1,452.4837 44.91 56.98 0.013

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Palm Beach Atl. 0.2831 39.71 11.40 36.46 48.54 3.46 7.41
2nd Tampa 0.2819 41.22 13.03 38.54 46.69 3.38 6.93
3rd Fla. Southern 0.2732 38.89 11.57 36.25 49.17 3.46 8.70
4th Lynn 0.2650 41.31 14.81 38.71 44.69 5.17 8.93
5th Saint Leo 0.2511 38.66 13.55 36.12 47.43 4.82 7.31
6th Nova Southeastern 0.2448 37.12 12.64 33.71 51.18 3.75 9.40
7th Barry 0.2428 39.24 14.95 36.36 46.53 4.33 7.54
8th Eckerd 0.2378 38.13 14.35 35.47 48.93 3.68 7.79
9th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.2181 33.55 11.74 31.24 56.94 3.74 7.19
10th Rollins 0.2114 36.63 15.49 34.43 50.02 4.05 6.92
11th Florida Tech 0.1877 34.99 16.21 32.37 50.78 5.38 6.46

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Palm Beach Atl. 0.0993 28.03 18.10 26.39 56.00 7.95 3.50
2nd Tampa 0.1151 28.35 16.83 26.10 58.75 5.76 2.61
3rd Saint Leo 0.1180 28.83 17.04 27.03 57.32 5.74 4.02
4th Barry 0.1218 29.35 17.18 26.73 55.25 6.57 5.11
5th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.1378 31.50 17.72 29.92 53.67 6.32 5.21
6th Fla. Southern 0.1435 30.14 15.78 28.25 57.16 5.80 4.75
7th Rollins 0.1484 30.81 15.97 28.64 54.96 5.79 3.45
8th Lynn 0.1485 30.42 15.57 27.79 55.97 5.61 5.32
9th Nova Southeastern 0.1522 31.35 16.13 29.30 54.98 5.91 4.35
10th Eckerd 0.1581 31.28 15.47 29.37 54.91 6.02 3.99
11th Florida Tech 0.1748 32.45 14.97 29.97 54.70 5.13 5.49

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,540.5060 1,540.3319 1,538.3158 1,539.4181 1,539.6429
Difference -0.1741 -2.1902 -1.0879 -1.1507

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Palm Beach Atl. 131 3,034 1,408 173 186 46.41 17.5 16.3 2,659 1,004 125 208 62.24 21.3 12.8
Tampa 119 2,669 1,225 154 229 45.90 17.3 11.7 2,390 932 100 216 61.00 23.9 11.1
Fla. Southern 128 2,885 1,262 194 321 43.74 14.9 9.0 2,697 1,061 158 241 60.66 17.1 11.2
Lynn 119 2,658 1,191 197 259 44.81 13.5 10.3 2,484 1,008 157 184 59.42 15.8 13.5
Saint Leo 122 2,738 1,195 151 199 43.65 18.1 13.8 2,672 1,111 141 225 58.42 19.0 11.9
Barry 121 2,667 1,163 163 253 43.61 16.4 10.5 2,609 1,101 161 238 57.80 16.2 11.0
Eckerd 121 2,561 1,080 176 216 42.17 14.6 11.9 2,573 1,094 129 213 57.48 19.9 12.1
Nova Southeastern 131 2,760 1,169 215 270 42.36 12.8 10.2 2,779 1,189 152 206 57.22 18.3 13.5
Embry-Riddle (FL) 113 2,379 1,044 134 144 43.88 17.8 16.5 2,430 1,089 165 216 55.19 14.7 11.3
Rollins 124 2,520 1,075 147 200 42.66 17.1 12.6 2,597 1,154 124 191 55.56 20.9 13.6
Florida Tech 105 2,159 867 107 159 40.16 20.2 13.6 2,428 1,157 162 187 52.35 15.0 13.0
Conference Average 121 2,639 1,153 165 221 43.58 16.4 12.4 2,574 1,082 143 211 57.94 18.4 12.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sunshine State

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.89

2016-10-08 Saint Leo, Fla.
Saint Leo
Lynn
3
1
25
21
29
27
25
27
29
27
GAME

77.02

2016-09-23 Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.
Nova Southeastern
Fla. Southern
1
3
24
26
17
25
31
29
23
25
GAME

76.68

2016-10-04 Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.
Nova Southeastern
Palm Beach Atl.
2
3
25
20
25
20
24
26
25
27
13
15
GAME

76.66

2016-11-12 Miami Shores, FL
Barry
Saint Leo
3
2
24
26
22
25
25
22
25
21
15
13
GAME

76.62

2016-10-22 Tampa, Fla.
Tampa
Palm Beach Atl.
1
3
25
20
20
25
20
25
31
33
GAME

76.36

2016-09-17 St. Petersburg, FL
Eckerd
Fla. Southern
3
2
26
24
25
18
20
25
25
27
15
13
GAME

76.30

2016-11-01 Tampa, Fla.
Tampa
Fla. Southern
3
1
25
23
25
22
22
25
25
18
GAME

76.11

2016-11-12 Boca Raton, Fla.
Lynn
Tampa
3
1
22
25
25
21
25
23
30
28
GAME

75.59

2016-11-11 Miami Shores, FL
Barry
Tampa
2
3
26
24
28
26
23
25
19
25
11
15
GAME

75.50

2016-09-16 St. Petersburg, FL
Eckerd
Tampa
1
3
16
25
19
25
27
25
25
27

HuskerGeek Sunshine State All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 30.8420
2 28.5318
3 27.2465
4 27.1727
5 27.0683
6 26.9518
7 25.2251
8 25.0483
9 24.7989
10 23.6677

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.1022
2 18.6411
3 17.8347
4 17.4238
5 14.6114
6 13.8288
7 13.7068
8 13.2717
9 13.1987
10 11.7978

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 22.7378
2 22.6929
3 19.6119
4 19.1760
5 18.9731
6 16.7341
7 16.4983
8 15.8499
9 15.3288
10 14.0479

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2372
2 0.2349
3 0.2303
4 0.2178
5 0.2175
6 0.2115
7 0.2106
8 0.2084
9 0.1972
10 0.1940

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1580
2 0.1499
3 0.1469
4 0.1361
5 0.1182
6 0.1138
7 0.1130
8 0.1115
9 0.1080
10 0.1044

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1864
2 0.1787
3 0.1608
4 0.1532
5 0.1464
6 0.1422
7 0.1406
8 0.1391
9 0.1332
10 0.1328


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek