Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sunshine State - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Palm Beach Atl. 1,621.4813 1,580.2116 1,600.7134 53.42 69.20 0.212
2nd Palm Beach Atl. 1,621.4813 1,580.2116 1,600.7134 53.42 69.20 0.212
3rd Fla. Southern 1,601.7144 1,573.3929 1,587.4905 51.92 68.13 0.195
4th Saint Leo 1,583.2115 1,542.6336 1,562.7908 51.65 65.10 0.140
5th Tampa 1,533.5327 1,506.3236 1,519.8673 49.63 64.67 0.147
6th Eckerd 1,529.8587 1,507.8669 1,518.8230 50.41 62.44 0.103
7th Embry-Riddle (FL) 1,512.0011 1,475.1919 1,493.4831 47.60 62.19 0.094
8th Rollins 1,478.9513 1,440.6702 1,459.6852 46.35 60.41 0.076
9th Barry 1,462.9268 1,433.7749 1,448.2775 48.93 56.78 0.103
10th Florida Tech 1,434.2119 1,409.1114 1,421.6062 45.99 56.71 0.041
11th Lynn 1,431.3461 1,407.7807 1,419.5145 44.20 59.21 0.048
12th Nova Southeastern 1,426.7755 1,403.2895 1,414.9838 46.23 55.37 -0.002

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Fla. Southern 0.3209 42.08 9.99 38.89 47.25 2.80 7.61
2nd Palm Beach Atl. 0.2990 41.83 11.94 38.48 46.15 3.88 8.20
3rd Palm Beach Atl. 0.2990 41.83 11.94 38.48 46.15 3.88 8.20
4th Tampa 0.2754 41.58 14.04 38.81 45.62 4.29 6.64
5th Saint Leo 0.2434 38.20 13.86 35.82 48.76 5.47 7.18
6th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.2402 36.79 12.78 34.67 50.13 4.51 8.02
7th Barry 0.2326 38.66 15.39 36.15 47.58 4.54 6.86
8th Rollins 0.2322 37.28 14.06 35.18 49.68 4.60 6.46
9th Eckerd 0.2221 37.50 15.30 34.57 48.32 4.85 9.28
10th Florida Tech 0.1945 33.32 13.87 30.56 53.90 3.67 7.01
11th Lynn 0.1942 35.47 16.05 33.51 50.54 7.04 5.68
12th Nova Southeastern 0.1795 33.38 15.43 30.68 53.66 3.96 8.55

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Palm Beach Atl. 0.0867 26.50 17.83 25.03 58.88 7.47 2.86
2nd Palm Beach Atl. 0.0867 26.50 17.83 25.03 58.88 7.47 2.86
3rd Saint Leo 0.1039 27.79 17.40 26.63 59.07 5.97 3.58
4th Eckerd 0.1195 28.18 16.23 26.44 58.22 5.50 4.02
5th Fla. Southern 0.1257 28.92 16.36 27.27 58.66 5.88 4.58
6th Tampa 0.1289 29.94 17.05 27.95 53.89 6.02 4.02
7th Barry 0.1292 30.40 17.48 27.96 53.50 6.52 7.48
8th Lynn 0.1465 30.24 15.60 28.20 55.52 6.06 4.47
9th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.1465 30.97 16.32 29.43 55.22 5.50 6.70
10th Florida Tech 0.1539 29.41 14.01 27.73 57.79 4.62 5.15
11th Rollins 0.1562 32.46 16.85 30.50 53.05 6.10 4.89
12th Nova Southeastern 0.1817 33.75 15.59 31.23 53.94 5.63 4.54

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,503.9957 1,503.2252 1,501.5030 1,500.4878 1,502.3029
Difference -0.7706 -2.4928 -3.5079 -2.2571

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Fla. Southern 134 3,031 1,382 191 277 45.60 15.9 10.9 2,693 1,016 148 199 62.27 18.2 13.5
Saint Leo 116 2,629 1,224 154 187 46.56 17.1 14.1 2,383 954 112 229 59.97 21.3 10.4
Eckerd 110 2,434 1,120 191 203 46.02 12.7 12.0 2,294 972 115 172 57.63 19.9 13.3
Tampa 120 2,597 1,166 133 226 44.90 19.5 11.5 2,449 1,014 127 234 58.60 19.3 10.5
Embry-Riddle (FL) 92 1,991 875 133 150 43.95 15.0 13.3 1,921 803 145 146 58.20 13.2 13.2
Barry 94 1,953 863 99 163 44.19 19.7 12.0 2,074 989 180 150 52.31 11.5 13.8
Rollins 102 2,146 873 105 181 40.68 20.4 11.9 2,315 1,052 138 161 54.56 16.8 14.4
Lynn 109 2,232 889 95 151 39.83 23.5 14.8 2,431 1,102 135 214 54.67 18.0 11.4
Nova Southeastern 100 2,063 878 154 200 42.56 13.4 10.3 2,270 1,100 122 177 51.54 18.6 12.8
Florida Tech 97 1,960 830 113 152 42.35 17.3 12.9 2,176 1,068 135 140 50.92 16.1 15.5
Conference Average 107 2,304 1,010 137 189 43.66 17.5 12.4 2,301 1,007 136 182 56.07 17.3 12.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sunshine State

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.17

2017-10-10 Saint Leo, Fla.
Saint Leo
Fla. Southern
2
3
18
25
25
23
19
25
25
17
12
15
GAME

73.86

2017-10-07 Daytona Beach, Fla.
Embry-Riddle (FL)
Fla. Southern
1
3
25
20
22
25
21
25
23
25
GAME

73.06

2017-10-28 Boca Raton, Fla.
Lynn
Fla. Southern
2
3
30
28
23
25
25
22
14
25
12
15
GAME

72.95

2017-11-07 Saint Leo, Fla.
Saint Leo
Eckerd
3
2
25
22
22
25
27
29
25
18
15
8
GAME

72.04

2017-11-14 Lakeland, Fla.
Fla. Southern
Saint Leo
3
0
25
16
25
18
38
36
GAME

71.95

2017-10-21 Tampa, Fla.
Tampa
Barry
3
2
25
13
23
25
25
23
26
28
15
9
GAME

71.88

2017-11-03 Tampa, Fla.
Tampa
Rollins
3
2
25
15
29
31
25
14
25
27
17
15
GAME

71.26

2017-09-19 Lakeland, Fla.
Fla. Southern
Tampa
3
2
22
25
25
21
21
25
25
15
15
10
GAME

71.18

2017-10-06 Daytona Beach, Fla.
Embry-Riddle (FL)
Tampa
2
3
25
22
22
25
25
21
21
25
13
15
GAME

71.12

2017-10-26 Boca Raton, Fla.
Lynn
Tampa
3
1
25
23
27
25
14
25
25
21

HuskerGeek Sunshine State All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 33.7239
2 30.5823
3 28.0654
4 24.8562
5 23.7500
6 21.7008
7 20.2309
8 19.2285
9 18.8626
10 18.4982

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.1766
2 19.3794
3 14.5117
4 14.3828
5 14.0648
6 13.1112
7 13.0032
8 11.5412
9 10.4124
10 10.3774

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.3743
2 17.0922
3 16.9104
4 16.3442
5 14.9543
6 14.9148
7 14.9078
8 13.5472
9 13.0683
10 11.7754

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2574
2 0.2448
3 0.2335
4 0.2280
5 0.2142
6 0.2128
7 0.2071
8 0.2068
9 0.2052
10 0.1853

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1540
2 0.1483
3 0.1479
4 0.1319
5 0.1275
6 0.1268
7 0.1234
8 0.1141
9 0.1114
10 0.1090

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1900
2 0.1634
3 0.1554
4 0.1511
5 0.1423
6 0.1368
7 0.1347
8 0.1266
9 0.1202
10 0.1142


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek