Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sunshine State - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Tampa 1,645.2846 1,642.8081 1,644.0459 58.44 69.82 0.276
2nd Barry 1,577.2216 1,575.4603 1,576.3407 49.92 50.08 0.166
3rd Florida Tech 1,496.9230 1,495.1596 1,496.0410 60.74 57.89 0.067
4th Saint Leo 1,468.1798 1,465.5762 1,466.8774 58.44 56.65 0.074
5th Palm Beach Atl. 1,458.4501 1,455.5797 1,457.0142 62.00 49.20 0.097
6th Fla. Southern 1,432.8052 1,430.4525 1,431.6284 54.73 50.43 0.033
7th Rollins 1,281.5661 1,279.2350 1,280.4000 49.28 49.76 -0.097

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Tampa 0.4331 46.15 2.84 41.92 38.44 1.43 6.66
2nd Barry 0.3637 40.41 4.04 37.88 46.62 2.78 16.46
3rd Saint Leo 0.3176 41.14 9.38 39.92 43.77 5.88 7.05
4th Florida Tech 0.3000 34.34 4.34 31.37 52.09 6.51 3.57
5th Palm Beach Atl. 0.2910 36.43 7.33 33.01 47.39 3.82 3.66
6th Fla. Southern 0.2612 37.78 11.66 35.09 44.89 5.39 11.56
7th Rollins 0.2154 31.69 10.15 30.50 50.43 4.57 5.74

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Tampa 0.1571 25.42 9.71 23.01 61.61 6.38 3.88
2nd Palm Beach Atl. 0.1936 31.17 11.81 28.00 55.57 8.69 11.90
3rd Barry 0.1979 26.42 6.63 25.24 57.81 1.19 10.76
4th Fla. Southern 0.2279 33.31 10.52 31.88 55.35 9.96 6.83
5th Florida Tech 0.2332 31.71 8.39 29.60 51.89 5.29 7.13
6th Saint Leo 0.2431 34.22 9.91 30.92 53.62 6.89 6.85
7th Rollins 0.3126 37.34 6.08 33.81 48.20 5.38 11.13

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,478.9068 1,485.5803 1,473.3109 1,466.8774 1,476.1689
Difference 6.6735 -5.5959 -12.0294 -3.6506

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Florida Tech 10 233 142 17 9 60.94 13.7 25.9 156 65 14 31 58.33 11.1 5.0
Tampa 34 794 409 55 77 51.51 14.4 10.3 609 224 22 74 63.22 27.7 8.2
Palm Beach Atl. 10 217 126 13 24 58.07 16.7 9.0 196 105 21 25 46.43 9.3 7.8
Saint Leo 13 285 145 23 36 50.88 12.4 7.9 275 131 16 42 52.36 17.2 6.5
Fla. Southern 9 161 78 21 27 48.45 7.7 6.0 195 102 11 15 47.69 17.7 13.0
Barry 4 49 25 8 14 51.02 6.1 3.5 85 56 6 4 34.12 14.2 21.3
Rollins 32 563 245 34 90 43.52 16.6 6.3 748 445 75 85 40.51 10.0 8.8
Conference Average 16 329 167 24 40 52.05 12.5 9.8 323 161 24 39 48.95 15.3 10.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sunshine State

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

68.84

2021-04-06
Saint Leo
Tampa
0
3
23
25
23
25
14
25
GAME

66.36

2021-03-26
Florida Tech
Barry
1
3
21
25
25
21
15
25
23
25
GAME

65.53

2021-04-01 Tampa, Fla.
Tampa
Fla. Southern
3
0
25
14
25
19
25
19
GAME

64.95

2021-03-27 Tampa, Fla.
Tampa
Saint Leo
3
0
25
18
25
16
25
16
GAME

64.86

2021-04-10 Tampa, Fla.
Tampa
Palm Beach Atl.
3
0
25
16
25
11
25
18
GAME

61.61

2021-03-30
Rollins
Florida Tech
0
3
23
25
21
25
23
25
GAME

61.25

2021-04-09 Tampa, Fla.
Tampa
Rollins
3
0
25
17
25
15
25
13
GAME

59.88

2021-03-12
Rollins
Tampa
0
3
9
25
17
25
11
25
GAME

58.86

2021-03-26
Rollins
Saint Leo
1
3
16
25
16
25
27
25
13
25
GAME

58.80

2021-04-17
Florida Tech
Rollins
3
0
25
15
25
11
25
12

HuskerGeek Sunshine State All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 5.3489
2 5.2516
3 4.5912
4 4.1617
5 3.5533
6 2.2873
7 2.1965
8 1.8732
9 1.6689
10 1.6564

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 3.3557
2 3.0969
3 2.7858
4 2.4420
5 1.3904
6 1.3258
7 1.2573
8 0.9180
9 0.8690
10 0.8199

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 3.1286
2 2.2520
3 2.1492
4 2.0689
5 1.8959
6 1.7434
7 1.5251
8 1.3759
9 1.2766
10 1.1955

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1629
2 0.1573
3 0.1545
4 0.1516
5 0.1481
6 0.1237
7 0.1224
8 0.1184
9 0.1182
10 0.1109

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.0987
2 0.0911
3 0.0820
4 0.0819
5 0.0788
6 0.0648
7 0.0642
8 0.0612
9 0.0603
10 0.0517

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1277
2 0.1173
3 0.1043
4 0.0981
5 0.0787
6 0.0693
7 0.0667
8 0.0662
9 0.0647
10 0.0558


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek