Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sunshine State - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Tampa 1,637.9194 1,641.0236 1,639.4707 57.48 60.99 0.220
2nd Nova Southeastern 1,590.8961 1,598.5246 1,594.7058 55.71 56.18 0.180
3rd Embry-Riddle (FL) 1,591.0841 1,596.1941 1,593.6370 57.22 56.87 0.190
4th Lynn 1,575.3921 1,581.1477 1,578.2673 57.38 56.18 0.171
5th Palm Beach Atl. 1,558.6086 1,557.8574 1,558.2330 55.81 55.74 0.129
6th Fla. Southern 1,513.9331 1,517.9386 1,515.9345 55.49 52.51 0.082
7th Eckerd 1,505.2061 1,509.8629 1,507.5327 53.55 53.75 0.102
8th Barry 1,488.3091 1,494.3055 1,491.3043 55.24 51.80 0.083
9th Saint Leo 1,469.2328 1,473.6476 1,471.4386 53.20 50.70 0.045
10th Florida Tech 1,406.3534 1,405.5478 1,405.9506 51.20 48.80 -0.012
11th Rollins 1,400.7386 1,405.9009 1,403.3174 50.81 47.07 0.013

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Tampa 0.3081 42.17 11.36 38.77 44.35 3.65 6.77
2nd Nova Southeastern 0.2956 45.82 16.26 41.40 38.73 5.51 8.63
3rd Palm Beach Atl. 0.2853 42.67 14.14 38.84 41.88 4.70 8.08
4th Lynn 0.2757 40.23 12.65 36.72 43.85 4.23 6.87
5th Eckerd 0.2676 40.76 13.99 36.67 44.31 4.45 8.97
6th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.2643 39.31 12.89 36.05 47.88 4.58 8.44
7th Barry 0.2383 36.97 13.14 33.14 47.58 5.10 8.13
8th Fla. Southern 0.2213 37.18 15.05 34.59 48.85 5.04 9.54
9th Saint Leo 0.2173 35.90 14.16 32.93 49.57 5.72 7.24
10th Florida Tech 0.1774 30.98 13.23 27.57 54.21 4.63 5.94
11th Rollins 0.1725 33.40 16.15 31.14 51.70 4.80 7.18

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.0745 26.88 19.43 25.66 55.91 7.88 4.56
2nd Tampa 0.0885 25.53 16.68 23.47 60.48 6.41 4.07
3rd Lynn 0.1051 28.28 17.77 26.32 54.10 6.45 5.59
4th Nova Southeastern 0.1152 28.86 17.34 26.25 57.49 7.71 4.94
5th Fla. Southern 0.1397 30.89 16.92 28.79 55.15 5.84 6.58
6th Barry 0.1555 30.11 14.56 27.08 55.64 5.01 6.30
7th Palm Beach Atl. 0.1558 32.71 17.12 30.58 51.14 6.81 6.33
8th Rollins 0.1599 33.61 17.62 30.63 50.64 5.85 8.35
9th Eckerd 0.1658 32.75 16.17 29.76 51.37 6.32 7.54
10th Saint Leo 0.1728 33.36 16.08 31.65 52.10 5.36 7.04
11th Florida Tech 0.1891 34.24 15.33 31.31 49.57 5.35 7.03

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,523.6174 1,524.1115 1,530.9068 1,530.2543 1,527.2225
Difference 0.4941 7.2893 6.6369 4.8068

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Tampa 129 2,671 1,431 181 229 53.58 14.8 11.7 2,181 946 126 255 56.63 17.3 8.6
Nova Southeastern 113 2,271 1,192 219 244 52.49 10.4 9.3 1,934 918 124 178 52.53 15.6 10.9
Lynn 114 2,259 1,199 151 171 53.08 15.0 13.2 2,049 986 146 172 51.88 14.0 11.9
Embry-Riddle (FL) 119 1,137 594 229 259 52.24 5.0 4.4 1,059 502 141 214 52.60 7.5 4.9
Palm Beach Atl. 120 2,384 1,243 194 223 52.14 12.3 10.7 2,201 1,065 172 195 51.61 12.8 11.3
Fla. Southern 104 1,980 1,032 197 217 52.12 10.1 9.1 1,958 1,005 161 187 48.67 12.2 10.5
Barry 94 1,875 970 165 211 51.73 11.4 8.9 1,901 974 152 175 48.76 12.5 10.9
Eckerd 111 2,037 1,018 211 210 49.98 9.7 9.7 1,999 992 209 195 50.38 9.6 10.3
Saint Leo 109 2,045 1,024 163 165 50.07 12.5 12.4 2,170 1,132 190 172 47.83 11.4 12.6
Florida Tech 108 1,991 955 121 166 47.97 16.5 12.0 2,324 1,240 196 206 46.64 11.9 11.3
Rollins 107 1,696 820 157 253 48.35 10.8 6.7 2,009 1,143 216 215 43.11 9.3 9.3
Conference Average 112 2,031 1,043 181 213 51.25 11.7 9.8 1,980 991 167 197 50.06 12.2 10.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sunshine State

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

84.46

2021-09-25 Daytona Beach, Fla.
Embry-Riddle (FL)
Palm Beach Atl.
3
2
29
31
26
28
25
19
25
21
17
15
GAME

83.03

2021-11-13
Nova Southeastern
Tampa
2
3
23
25
28
30
25
18
25
20
13
15
GAME

76.02

2021-09-17
Eckerd
Tampa
2
3
25
22
25
12
29
31
20
25
3
15
GAME

75.70

2021-10-26
Nova Southeastern
Lynn
3
2
25
19
25
27
22
25
25
19
15
10
GAME

75.38

2021-11-06
Tampa
Palm Beach Atl.
3
1
25
19
27
25
24
26
25
13
GAME

75.12

2021-11-20
Tampa
Embry-Riddle (FL)
3
1
25
15
20
25
25
23
28
26
GAME

74.43

2021-09-24 Daytona Beach, Fla.
Embry-Riddle (FL)
Lynn
3
0
25
18
25
20
25
20
GAME

74.32

2021-10-30
Lynn
Embry-Riddle (FL)
1
3
20
25
25
19
30
32
24
26
GAME

73.71

2021-10-29
Palm Beach Atl.
Embry-Riddle (FL)
2
3
18
25
26
24
24
26
25
23
10
15
GAME

73.39

2021-09-30
Nova Southeastern
Embry-Riddle (FL)
3
2
25
18
25
17
21
25
24
26
15
12

HuskerGeek Sunshine State All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 32.3949
2 18.6137
3 17.9648
4 17.2348
5 16.6598
6 16.6275
7 16.4943
8 16.1749
9 16.1015
10 16.0379

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 23.6238
2 12.3675
3 11.1816
4 10.1878
5 10.0266
6 9.4957
7 9.1262
8 8.6424
9 8.5499
10 8.0237

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.3395
2 15.5189
3 14.4330
4 13.5193
5 12.8940
6 12.7649
7 12.4237
8 10.8101
9 9.5696
10 9.5351

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.3115
2 0.2052
3 0.1880
4 0.1871
5 0.1855
6 0.1813
7 0.1811
8 0.1755
9 0.1696
10 0.1688

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.2272
2 0.1344
3 0.1141
4 0.1129
5 0.1102
6 0.1061
7 0.1044
8 0.1042
9 0.1031
10 0.1029

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1751
2 0.1634
3 0.1586
4 0.1484
5 0.1335
6 0.1300
7 0.1277
8 0.1268
9 0.1249
10 0.1207


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek