Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sunshine State - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Tampa 1,647.5993 1,649.6825 1,648.6406 59.07 59.72 0.209
2nd Lynn 1,633.2977 1,632.1649 1,632.7312 58.25 55.35 0.193
3rd Eckerd 1,601.0388 1,600.3478 1,600.6933 56.86 56.05 0.163
4th Barry 1,599.7762 1,601.0670 1,600.4215 56.88 56.44 0.194
5th Embry-Riddle (FL) 1,529.8992 1,532.3040 1,531.1011 56.75 51.16 0.112
6th Fla. Southern 1,511.0418 1,516.2727 1,513.6550 57.73 51.49 0.099
7th Nova Southeastern 1,513.9187 1,513.1198 1,513.5192 52.83 52.69 0.096
8th Palm Beach Atl. 1,477.4035 1,479.7287 1,478.5656 53.03 50.63 0.056
9th Saint Leo 1,473.0176 1,471.5297 1,472.2734 51.97 49.20 0.035
10th Florida Tech 1,455.3770 1,458.0670 1,456.7214 53.16 49.89 0.036
11th Rollins 1,445.4795 1,445.4425 1,445.4610 49.75 49.68 0.021

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Barry 0.3058 42.25 11.67 39.15 43.64 3.73 7.03
2nd Tampa 0.3009 40.87 10.78 37.93 46.28 2.81 7.74
3rd Lynn 0.2881 43.41 14.60 40.04 40.05 4.38 8.01
4th Eckerd 0.2754 40.72 13.19 37.40 42.02 3.49 8.73
5th Nova Southeastern 0.2518 40.45 15.27 37.07 43.55 4.78 8.83
6th Fla. Southern 0.2332 35.01 11.69 32.82 54.03 4.47 8.96
7th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.2331 36.62 13.31 33.98 46.92 4.41 8.04
8th Saint Leo 0.2244 38.10 15.66 35.88 44.24 5.44 7.77
9th Palm Beach Atl. 0.2223 37.85 15.62 35.37 47.43 6.14 7.98
10th Florida Tech 0.2166 34.53 12.87 32.20 49.27 4.29 6.23
11th Rollins 0.1895 36.34 17.39 34.05 46.18 6.64 7.76

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Tampa 0.0920 26.56 17.37 23.82 58.10 6.67 4.13
2nd Lynn 0.0951 26.67 17.16 24.04 57.69 6.93 4.52
3rd Barry 0.1121 28.06 16.85 25.62 55.40 6.76 5.15
4th Eckerd 0.1124 28.02 16.78 25.51 54.56 5.57 4.52
5th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.1208 29.20 17.12 26.31 51.45 7.02 6.21
6th Fla. Southern 0.1341 29.87 16.46 27.96 56.37 5.94 5.90
7th Nova Southeastern 0.1561 31.62 16.01 29.08 54.85 6.30 5.93
8th Palm Beach Atl. 0.1666 33.88 17.23 30.52 52.12 5.95 8.05
9th Rollins 0.1680 34.59 17.78 31.60 48.32 6.73 7.18
10th Florida Tech 0.1808 33.53 15.45 31.04 50.80 4.69 6.68
11th Saint Leo 0.1895 34.25 15.30 30.98 49.57 5.13 7.23

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,535.7985 1,533.2980 1,530.0327 1,527.4525 1,531.6454
Difference -2.5005 -5.7657 -8.3460 -5.5374

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Tampa 117 2,664 1,471 187 188 55.22 14.2 14.2 2,179 951 98 210 56.36 22.2 10.4
Eckerd 107 2,420 1,296 196 182 53.55 12.3 13.3 2,103 986 99 188 53.12 21.2 11.2
Lynn 106 2,431 1,327 168 210 54.59 14.5 11.6 2,056 987 103 183 51.99 20.0 11.2
Barry 118 2,716 1,437 157 227 52.91 17.3 12.0 2,399 1,135 137 231 52.69 17.5 10.4
Embry-Riddle (FL) 112 2,413 1,287 179 194 53.34 13.5 12.4 2,308 1,187 160 190 48.57 14.4 12.1
Fla. Southern 109 2,358 1,271 183 188 53.90 12.9 12.5 2,365 1,230 156 199 47.99 15.2 11.9
Nova Southeastern 117 2,575 1,282 205 264 49.79 12.6 9.8 2,518 1,260 158 204 49.96 15.9 12.3
Palm Beach Atl. 106 2,175 1,106 160 235 50.85 13.6 9.3 2,247 1,168 193 204 48.02 11.6 11.0
Florida Tech 113 2,380 1,222 131 210 51.35 18.2 11.3 2,526 1,327 183 243 47.47 13.8 10.4
Saint Leo 110 2,304 1,145 157 153 49.70 14.7 15.1 2,455 1,325 193 192 46.03 12.7 12.8
Rollins 117 2,391 1,130 160 269 47.26 14.9 8.9 2,643 1,412 201 245 46.58 13.1 10.8
Conference Average 112 2,439 1,270 171 211 52.04 14.4 11.8 2,345 1,179 153 208 49.89 16.2 11.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sunshine State

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.26

2022-09-17
Nova Southeastern
Tampa
3
2
25
20
18
25
25
19
24
26
18
16
GAME

76.95

2022-11-04
Barry
Tampa
3
2
26
24
18
25
25
21
22
25
15
7
GAME

76.63

2022-09-16
Lynn
Tampa
1
3
25
20
24
26
18
25
22
25
GAME

74.80

2022-10-22
Tampa
Lynn
3
2
25
17
26
24
20
25
19
25
15
10
GAME

74.40

2022-10-04
Palm Beach Atl.
Barry
2
3
25
22
26
24
19
25
23
25
13
15
GAME

73.60

2022-10-28
Embry-Riddle (FL)
Eckerd
3
1
28
26
25
16
19
25
25
18
GAME

73.48

2022-11-07
Fla. Southern
Embry-Riddle (FL)
3
1
25
14
20
25
25
20
27
25
GAME

73.43

2022-11-01
Fla. Southern
Eckerd
0
3
21
25
24
26
20
25
GAME

73.40

2022-09-24
Fla. Southern
Lynn
2
3
19
25
25
16
25
19
22
25
11
15
GAME

73.20

2022-10-11
Eckerd
Tampa
3
2
18
25
25
20
25
23
20
25
15
13

HuskerGeek Sunshine State All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 31.0325
2 25.4904
3 22.3094
4 22.1580
5 21.4820
6 20.5511
7 20.0285
8 19.1944
9 18.7930
10 18.7488

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 23.4025
2 16.9397
3 14.6581
4 14.0000
5 13.4925
6 11.1396
7 10.4690
8 10.3861
9 10.2219
10 10.1747

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.3829
2 16.7933
3 15.7520
4 14.6315
5 13.7012
6 13.3689
7 13.1961
8 12.9714
9 12.0875
10 11.8104

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2675
2 0.2160
3 0.2131
4 0.2124
5 0.1971
6 0.1959
7 0.1937
8 0.1923
9 0.1863
10 0.1854

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.2017
2 0.1436
3 0.1429
4 0.1409
5 0.1331
6 0.1238
7 0.1060
8 0.1057
9 0.1023
10 0.1004

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1595
2 0.1486
3 0.1432
4 0.1357
5 0.1257
6 0.1251
7 0.1215
8 0.1109
9 0.1054
10 0.1049


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek