Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sunshine State - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Tampa 1,694.3076 1,698.0924 1,696.1990 60.90 60.10 0.267
2nd Lynn 1,618.3721 1,620.6202 1,619.4957 59.08 56.36 0.172
3rd Fla. Southern 1,573.0399 1,575.2325 1,574.1358 57.05 53.53 0.154
4th Eckerd 1,569.0510 1,576.4066 1,572.7245 57.83 51.40 0.149
5th Nova Southeastern 1,566.8860 1,564.9091 1,565.8972 54.00 55.56 0.143
6th Embry-Riddle (FL) 1,551.0440 1,553.2217 1,552.1325 56.58 54.21 0.122
7th Barry 1,512.2487 1,513.9828 1,513.1155 54.17 51.41 0.096
8th Rollins 1,498.1030 1,498.6547 1,498.3788 52.75 52.53 0.078
9th Palm Beach Atl. 1,488.6365 1,491.6162 1,490.1256 54.13 51.07 0.064
10th Florida Tech 1,477.5192 1,480.2188 1,478.8684 53.72 49.30 0.025
11th Saint Leo 1,451.9551 1,458.6094 1,455.2785 51.15 49.93 0.035

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Tampa 0.3219 43.48 11.29 39.74 42.75 2.97 7.83
2nd Nova Southeastern 0.2881 42.76 13.95 39.85 42.43 4.09 7.21
3rd Lynn 0.2813 40.95 12.82 37.90 45.10 4.48 7.86
4th Fla. Southern 0.2717 39.82 12.65 37.15 47.00 3.86 6.01
5th Barry 0.2702 40.89 13.87 37.88 45.72 4.71 7.88
6th Rollins 0.2582 41.53 15.71 39.16 42.32 5.56 8.59
7th Eckerd 0.2532 39.20 13.88 36.12 46.02 3.68 8.34
8th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.2523 38.24 13.01 35.88 47.19 4.75 8.60
9th Palm Beach Atl. 0.2231 37.14 14.83 34.34 45.59 5.51 8.62
10th Saint Leo 0.2131 36.00 14.68 32.15 43.01 5.07 6.08
11th Florida Tech 0.2113 35.10 13.97 32.97 49.12 5.05 7.80

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Tampa 0.0545 24.47 19.02 22.55 61.77 7.60 5.78
2nd Eckerd 0.1037 28.30 17.93 26.33 54.78 7.67 5.02
3rd Lynn 0.1091 27.48 16.57 25.48 60.07 6.11 5.86
4th Fla. Southern 0.1174 29.55 17.81 27.64 55.49 7.50 6.37
5th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.1298 29.73 16.75 27.50 55.16 6.80 5.82
6th Nova Southeastern 0.1451 31.51 17.00 29.64 52.99 7.08 6.47
7th Palm Beach Atl. 0.1589 32.54 16.64 30.08 49.03 5.86 8.52
8th Barry 0.1742 32.70 15.28 29.63 52.67 5.82 7.88
9th Saint Leo 0.1782 32.46 14.63 27.39 50.29 5.40 6.45
10th Rollins 0.1797 34.26 16.29 31.89 50.35 6.21 7.89
11th Florida Tech 0.1861 32.23 13.62 29.52 56.03 4.31 6.40

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,546.9410 1,540.5416 1,538.0728 1,540.4497 1,541.5013
Difference -6.3995 -8.8682 -6.4913 -7.2530

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Tampa 121 2,801 1,587 199 206 56.66 14.1 13.6 2,139 947 138 211 55.73 15.5 10.1
Lynn 124 2,842 1,566 195 197 55.10 14.6 14.4 2,481 1,179 146 194 52.48 17.0 12.8
Embry-Riddle (FL) 117 2,599 1,376 201 197 52.94 12.9 13.2 2,482 1,227 148 190 50.56 16.8 13.1
Fla. Southern 115 2,568 1,380 134 154 53.74 19.2 16.7 2,427 1,223 167 165 49.61 14.5 14.7
Eckerd 108 2,486 1,361 198 210 54.75 12.6 11.8 2,218 1,146 113 157 48.33 19.6 14.1
Nova Southeastern 119 2,595 1,303 173 236 50.21 15.0 11.0 2,446 1,182 170 200 51.68 14.4 12.2
Rollins 116 2,479 1,255 199 266 50.63 12.5 9.3 2,488 1,262 199 203 49.28 12.5 12.3
Palm Beach Atl. 111 2,325 1,197 186 216 51.48 12.5 10.8 2,424 1,262 207 201 47.94 11.7 12.1
Barry 103 2,276 1,163 160 166 51.10 14.2 13.7 2,293 1,202 187 197 47.58 12.3 11.6
Florida Tech 113 2,365 1,192 166 161 50.40 14.2 14.7 2,590 1,406 177 221 45.71 14.6 11.7
Saint Leo 101 2,013 986 113 161 48.98 17.8 12.5 2,153 1,157 156 181 46.26 13.8 11.9
Conference Average 113 2,486 1,306 175 197 52.36 14.5 12.9 2,376 1,199 164 193 49.56 14.8 12.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

HuskerGeek Sunshine State All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.9356
2 25.2018
3 25.0278
4 23.5759
5 23.2892
6 22.5462
7 21.7093
8 21.7036
9 21.5301
10 21.1552

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.9562
2 15.5105
3 13.3321
4 13.0059
5 12.8204
6 12.6701
7 12.4527
8 11.9976
9 11.8013
10 11.4747

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.0220
2 14.9043
3 14.1708
4 14.0245
5 13.7526
6 12.6025
7 12.3576
8 11.8696
9 11.6113
10 11.4762

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2454
2 0.2289
3 0.2240
4 0.2211
5 0.2172
6 0.2070
7 0.2051
8 0.2031
9 0.2008
10 0.1991

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1521
2 0.1367
3 0.1263
4 0.1178
5 0.1176
6 0.1169
7 0.1167
8 0.1124
9 0.1112
10 0.1106

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1405
2 0.1349
3 0.1313
4 0.1285
5 0.1280
6 0.1265
7 0.1214
8 0.1186
9 0.1166
10 0.1163


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek