Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Louisville 1,717.9455

Football georgia 12.7744
Men's Soccer new hampshire 10.6445
Women's Soccer north carolina 11.4036
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.1463
Field Hockey penn st 9.6697

UAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Chicago 1,557.2058 1,558.3536 1,557.7796 69.71 71.56 0.091
2nd NYU 1,551.8715 1,549.1833 1,550.5268 68.17 70.54 0.084
3rd Emory 1,532.7032 1,535.9709 1,534.3362 69.04 73.90 0.082
4th WashU 1,523.1453 1,523.8616 1,523.5034 70.85 67.91 0.028
5th Carnegie Mellon 1,506.0597 1,506.1154 1,506.0875 65.40 70.88 -0.017
6th CWRU 1,484.4164 1,486.0729 1,485.2444 66.46 65.66 -0.026
7th Brandeis 1,347.0153 1,347.3873 1,347.2013 64.29 56.61 -0.150
8th Rochester (NY) 1,321.7704 1,323.3388 1,322.5544 63.73 58.01 -0.153

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st NYU 0.3034 38.84 8.50 36.97 46.62 5.19 7.44
2nd Emory 0.3021 38.83 8.62 36.21 46.84 5.35 8.68
3rd WashU 0.3005 34.98 4.94 30.36 47.01 5.21 9.04
4th Chicago 0.2842 34.15 5.73 32.37 54.27 4.83 8.34
5th Carnegie Mellon 0.2750 33.64 6.14 30.24 49.94 5.27 8.30
6th CWRU 0.2196 27.78 5.82 25.69 58.10 5.07 7.68
7th Rochester (NY) 0.1843 28.26 9.83 25.76 57.79 6.15 10.77
8th Brandeis 0.1529 26.62 11.33 24.45 55.88 5.83 8.74

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Chicago 0.1935 29.24 9.90 27.04 55.66 5.11 5.94
2nd NYU 0.2197 31.76 9.79 28.77 54.12 4.83 7.78
3rd Emory 0.2202 32.27 10.24 30.28 52.15 5.38 9.78
4th CWRU 0.2457 32.35 7.78 29.09 52.75 4.40 8.51
5th WashU 0.2727 33.93 6.66 30.27 48.96 3.57 8.59
6th Carnegie Mellon 0.2919 35.07 5.88 31.36 51.40 3.31 8.12
7th Brandeis 0.3029 36.50 6.21 32.84 52.05 3.36 10.22
8th Rochester (NY) 0.3369 39.38 5.68 35.83 49.32 2.97 9.05

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,478.4042 1,491.1499 1,512.2929 1,514.7955 1,499.1606
Difference 12.7457 33.8887 36.3913 27.6752

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
NYU 42 794 456 88 87 57.43 9.0 9.1 604 264 67 75 56.29 9.0 8.1
Emory 48 876 467 96 103 53.31 9.1 8.5 705 289 72 77 59.01 9.8 9.2
WashU 45 748 396 95 109 52.94 7.9 6.9 705 342 71 102 51.49 9.9 6.9
Chicago 52 825 417 87 99 50.55 9.5 8.3 747 347 76 100 53.55 9.8 7.5
Carnegie Mellon 53 847 413 92 78 48.76 9.2 10.9 787 357 80 79 54.64 9.8 10.0
CWRU 46 727 377 83 55 51.86 8.8 13.2 696 345 81 86 50.43 8.6 8.1
Rochester (NY) 39 495 282 96 110 56.97 5.2 4.5 496 276 86 78 44.36 5.8 6.4
Brandeis 45 734 362 82 78 49.32 9.0 9.4 861 509 107 100 40.88 8.0 8.6
Conference Average 46 756 396 90 90 52.64 8.4 8.9 700 341 80 87 51.33 8.9 8.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the UAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.38

2021-09-19 Chicago, Ill.
Chicago
WashU
3
2
25
18
25
11
25
27
12
25
17
15
GAME

70.53

2021-09-19 Chicago, Ill.
Emory
Carnegie Mellon
3
2
25
16
14
25
25
19
23
25
15
10
GAME

69.30

2021-09-18 Chicago, Ill.
Chicago
NYU
2
3
19
25
17
25
25
19
25
18
18
20
GAME

68.73

2021-09-18 Chicago, Ill.
Emory
CWRU
3
2
25
19
21
25
25
13
16
25
15
8
GAME

67.68

2021-09-18 Chicago, Ill.
WashU
NYU
1
3
18
25
25
14
19
25
17
25
GAME

64.52

2021-09-18 Chicago, Ill.
Carnegie Mellon
Brandeis
3
2
25
13
25
20
23
25
23
25
15
5
GAME

61.41

2021-09-18 Chicago, Ill.
Emory
Brandeis
3
0
25
19
25
14
25
14
GAME

59.50

2021-09-19 Chicago, Ill.
CWRU
Brandeis
3
0
25
14
25
12
25
16
GAME

58.63

2021-09-19 Chicago, IL
NYU
Rochester (NY)
3
0
25
19
25
11
25
5

HuskerGeek UAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 7.3689
2 7.0466
3 5.6080
4 5.5916
5 5.5736
6 5.3907
7 5.3142
8 5.1232
9 5.0585
10 4.7897

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 4.5420
2 3.7638
3 3.7247
4 3.6305
5 3.4732
6 3.4105
7 3.1469
8 3.0757
9 2.8212
10 2.7680

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 6.0557
2 5.0678
3 4.4383
4 4.3734
5 3.6443
6 3.4840
7 3.3993
8 3.2522
9 3.1880
10 3.1494

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1939
2 0.1854
3 0.1753
4 0.1652
5 0.1610
6 0.1586
7 0.1552
8 0.1541
9 0.1477
10 0.1473

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1171
2 0.1165
3 0.1066
4 0.1052
5 0.1029
6 0.0990
7 0.0980
8 0.0954
9 0.0832
10 0.0830

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1594
2 0.1370
3 0.1168
4 0.1121
5 0.1025
6 0.0966
7 0.0959
8 0.0954
9 0.0943
10 0.0895


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek