Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

UAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st NYU 1,604.9635 1,594.1810 1,599.5631 61.62 60.00 0.278
2nd Emory 1,580.7147 1,572.6692 1,576.6868 59.91 60.98 0.256
3rd Chicago 1,563.5979 1,563.6597 1,563.6288 60.16 61.17 0.253
4th WashU 1,528.5718 1,523.7024 1,526.1352 61.93 53.89 0.211
5th Carnegie Mellon 1,524.2465 1,517.6184 1,520.9288 55.24 58.15 0.178
6th CWRU 1,466.8517 1,467.8006 1,467.3260 59.18 53.06 0.117
7th Brandeis 1,365.8820 1,361.2183 1,363.5482 56.66 46.10 0.020
8th Rochester (NY) 1,327.3338 1,327.4495 1,327.3917 56.35 45.18 0.020

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Emory 0.3257 45.80 13.23 42.69 39.87 3.41 10.29
2nd NYU 0.3209 44.89 12.80 41.97 40.84 3.19 9.87
3rd WashU 0.2853 40.96 12.44 36.69 44.42 2.84 11.41
4th Chicago 0.2814 39.67 11.53 37.16 48.48 2.92 10.81
5th Carnegie Mellon 0.2786 39.25 11.39 35.77 46.77 2.95 10.14
6th CWRU 0.2144 33.64 12.20 30.54 52.98 3.57 9.90
7th Rochester (NY) 0.1598 32.87 16.89 29.92 53.83 3.69 11.95
8th Brandeis 0.1443 32.08 17.65 29.80 52.04 3.66 11.34

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Chicago 0.0283 22.40 19.57 21.09 63.12 6.44 4.50
2nd NYU 0.0424 24.27 20.03 22.45 60.53 7.28 6.10
3rd Emory 0.0702 25.55 18.53 24.17 59.59 5.97 6.45
4th WashU 0.0740 25.01 17.61 22.96 59.88 4.85 6.59
5th CWRU 0.0977 27.05 17.28 24.93 58.51 5.51 7.73
6th Carnegie Mellon 0.1009 27.00 16.91 24.73 59.06 4.80 7.54
7th Brandeis 0.1239 29.35 16.96 27.19 57.14 4.75 7.99
8th Rochester (NY) 0.1394 30.49 16.55 27.78 57.56 4.42 7.62

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,493.1511 1,503.0423 1,519.5047 1,523.5320 1,509.8075
Difference 9.8912 26.3536 30.3809 22.2086

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
NYU 107 1,439 840 227 218 58.37 6.3 6.6 1,119 491 153 172 56.12 7.3 6.5
Emory 114 1,478 776 197 225 52.50 7.5 6.6 1,247 551 145 209 55.81 8.6 6.0
CWRU 99 1,289 719 189 110 55.78 6.8 11.7 1,176 600 184 214 48.98 6.4 5.5
Chicago 52 825 417 87 99 50.55 9.5 8.3 747 347 76 100 53.55 9.8 7.5
WashU 97 1,523 823 198 246 54.04 7.7 6.2 1,464 761 155 204 48.02 9.4 7.2
Carnegie Mellon 109 1,059 509 165 185 48.06 6.4 5.7 1,027 483 170 205 52.97 6.0 5.0
Rochester (NY) 87 871 483 186 244 55.45 4.7 3.6 935 537 206 175 42.57 4.5 5.3
Brandeis 101 1,418 724 194 157 51.06 7.3 9.0 1,588 923 218 240 41.88 7.3 6.6
Conference Average 96 1,238 661 180 186 53.23 7.0 7.2 1,163 587 163 190 49.99 7.4 6.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the UAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.55

2021-09-19 Chicago, Ill.
Chicago
WashU
3
2
25
18
25
11
25
27
12
25
17
15
GAME

71.68

2021-09-19 Chicago, Ill.
Emory
Carnegie Mellon
3
2
25
16
14
25
25
19
23
25
15
10
GAME

70.40

2021-09-18 Chicago, Ill.
Chicago
NYU
2
3
19
25
17
25
25
19
25
18
18
20
GAME

69.86

2021-10-03 Waltham, MA
Emory
NYU
1
3
14
25
25
13
21
25
23
25
GAME

69.21

2021-09-18 Chicago, Ill.
Emory
CWRU
3
2
25
19
21
25
25
13
16
25
15
8
GAME

68.71

2021-09-18 Chicago, Ill.
WashU
NYU
1
3
18
25
25
14
19
25
17
25
GAME

65.28

2021-10-03 Waltham, MA
Emory
WashU
3
0
25
14
25
17
25
21
GAME

65.14

2021-09-18 Chicago, Ill.
Carnegie Mellon
Brandeis
3
2
25
13
25
20
23
25
23
25
15
5
GAME

64.06

2021-10-03
Brandeis
NYU
1
3
19
25
20
25
25
23
19
25
GAME

62.59

2021-09-18 Chicago, Ill.
Emory
Brandeis
3
0
25
19
25
14
25
14

HuskerGeek UAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 11.6201
2 11.0177
3 10.8555
4 10.5915
5 9.7229
6 9.6247
7 9.5296
8 8.5639
9 8.4350
10 8.2115

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 6.8696
2 5.9030
3 5.7684
4 5.5751
5 5.4254
6 5.3028
7 5.3019
8 5.1827
9 5.1680
10 5.0204

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 9.1204
2 9.0345
3 8.8040
4 7.6101
5 6.7846
6 6.3467
7 6.1748
8 5.8518
9 5.7004
10 5.6089

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1970
2 0.1902
3 0.1840
4 0.1610
5 0.1481
6 0.1469
7 0.1440
8 0.1396
9 0.1376
10 0.1358

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1093
2 0.1060
3 0.1004
4 0.0978
5 0.0916
6 0.0908
7 0.0878
8 0.0876
9 0.0857
10 0.0829

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1546
2 0.1174
3 0.1173
4 0.1153
5 0.1118
6 0.1112
7 0.1096
8 0.0992
9 0.0976
10 0.0902


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek