Nerdly Nebraska.

2022-2023 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Texas 1,730.6611

Football georgia 11.6118
Men's Basketball houston 9.4563
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.7610
Softball columbia 5.0000
Ice Hockey minnesota 8.5914
Men's Lacrosse marquette 7.9259
Men's Soccer kentucky 8.7687
Women's Soccer ucla 11.0741
Men's Volleyball long beach st 9.3011
Women's Volleyball texas 12.4762
Field Hockey north carolina 10.0384

UAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Emory 1,592.2844 1,586.5875 1,589.4334 63.29 58.27 0.282
2nd WashU 1,560.3593 1,560.1813 1,560.2703 62.73 58.69 0.267
3rd NYU 1,559.6966 1,558.3214 1,559.0089 63.99 58.32 0.276
4th UChicago 1,538.1825 1,540.6657 1,539.4236 72.98 71.87 0.032
5th Carnegie Mellon 1,539.5442 1,537.5775 1,538.5605 62.48 56.81 0.219
6th CWRU 1,506.4173 1,505.6681 1,506.0427 57.98 58.07 0.212
7th Brandeis 1,423.2365 1,422.4150 1,422.8257 56.50 51.42 0.131
8th Rochester (NY) 1,357.1227 1,354.7520 1,355.9368 57.24 46.93 0.065

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st WashU 0.3315 43.51 10.36 39.98 40.44 3.14 10.66
2nd NYU 0.3214 42.72 10.59 39.23 42.78 2.95 10.89
3rd Emory 0.3178 44.82 13.04 41.36 39.86 3.69 11.07
4th CWRU 0.2792 40.90 12.99 36.94 44.34 3.82 8.81
5th UChicago 0.2677 33.55 6.78 30.95 53.00 4.08 8.88
6th Carnegie Mellon 0.2638 37.97 11.58 34.18 48.53 3.36 12.17
7th Brandeis 0.2378 37.40 13.62 34.73 51.97 2.55 10.38
8th Rochester (NY) 0.1831 35.11 16.80 31.79 50.30 3.72 12.11

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Emory 0.0361 22.38 18.78 20.86 62.68 5.87 5.54
2nd Carnegie Mellon 0.0448 22.65 18.17 20.73 62.87 4.96 5.60
3rd NYU 0.0457 22.95 18.39 20.69 59.93 5.68 6.03
4th WashU 0.0644 24.26 17.82 22.06 60.20 4.58 6.05
5th CWRU 0.0667 25.92 19.25 24.32 58.25 6.00 6.48
6th Brandeis 0.1071 27.54 16.83 25.81 60.33 5.18 7.58
7th Rochester (NY) 0.1176 28.49 16.72 25.58 55.74 3.78 9.01
8th UChicago 0.2359 30.61 7.02 28.76 55.49 4.78 7.30

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,508.9377 1,521.0219 1,535.7589 1,538.9921 1,526.1777
Difference 12.0842 26.8212 30.0543 22.9866

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
WashU 131 2,873 1,623 244 280 56.49 11.8 10.3 2,444 1,161 193 258 52.50 12.7 9.5
NYU 136 3,129 1,758 263 302 56.18 11.9 10.4 2,762 1,350 202 253 51.12 13.7 10.9
CWRU 99 1,878 1,017 176 121 54.15 10.7 15.5 1,657 789 134 158 52.38 12.4 10.5
Emory 102 2,364 1,301 200 166 55.03 11.8 14.2 1,985 968 131 175 51.23 15.2 11.3
Carnegie Mellon 109 2,268 1,248 228 213 55.03 9.9 10.6 2,107 1,048 153 181 50.26 13.8 11.6
Brandeis 93 2,059 1,077 189 159 52.31 10.9 12.9 1,997 1,044 171 192 47.72 11.7 10.4
Rochester (NY) 99 1,905 1,041 209 248 54.65 9.1 7.7 2,017 1,146 210 160 43.18 9.6 12.6
Conference Average 110 2,354 1,295 216 213 54.83 10.9 11.7 2,138 1,072 171 197 49.77 12.7 11.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the UAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.40

2022-09-17
WashU
NYU
3
2
13
25
25
18
33
35
25
23
15
13
GAME

72.65

2022-09-18 St. Louis, MO
Carnegie Mellon
NYU
1
3
12
25
19
25
25
19
21
25
GAME

72.55

2022-10-16 Rochester, NY
Emory
NYU
2
3
23
25
16
25
25
23
25
17
9
15
GAME

71.69

2022-10-16 Rochester, NY
CWRU
Carnegie Mellon
3
2
25
16
18
25
20
25
25
22
17
15
GAME

71.68

2022-10-16 Rochester, NY
CWRU
WashU
3
2
18
25
25
20
25
22
18
25
15
13
GAME

71.54

2022-11-04 Brooklyn, NY
WashU
Carnegie Mellon
3
2
25
12
23
25
23
25
25
17
15
10
GAME

70.49

2022-10-02 Pittsburgh, Pa.
Carnegie Mellon
Emory
3
2
16
25
25
18
25
20
15
25
15
12
GAME

69.63

2022-11-05
NYU
Carnegie Mellon
3
1
25
13
25
20
22
25
25
16
GAME

69.20

2022-09-17
WashU
Carnegie Mellon
3
1
25
23
25
20
19
25
25
21
GAME

69.10

2022-10-02 Pittsburgh, Pa.
Emory
WashU
3
1
22
25
25
17
25
18
25
17

HuskerGeek UAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 28.3561
2 24.1676
3 22.4204
4 22.1241
5 21.3941
6 20.0853
7 19.8722
8 19.6499
9 18.6475
10 18.5060

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.3795
2 13.0216
3 12.0255
4 11.6947
5 11.6799
6 10.7615
7 10.1602
8 9.4885
9 9.3392
10 8.2587

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 25.2377
2 15.1344
3 13.1519
4 13.0580
5 12.3281
6 10.6157
7 10.5217
8 10.4442
9 10.0317
10 9.9251

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2208
2 0.2198
3 0.2183
4 0.2085
5 0.2030
6 0.1888
7 0.1826
8 0.1790
9 0.1676
10 0.1622

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1287
2 0.1277
3 0.1112
4 0.1098
5 0.1072
6 0.1017
7 0.0970
8 0.0932
9 0.0924
10 0.0921

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1856
2 0.1385
3 0.1342
4 0.1280
5 0.1264
6 0.1241
7 0.1238
8 0.1166
9 0.1027
10 0.0961


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek