Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,724.7831

Football ohio st 10.8908
Ice Hockey michigan 5.0000
Men's Soccer marshall 10.0965
Women's Soccer penn st 9.9817
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.7753
Field Hockey northwestern 9.9036

UAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Emory 1,641.1963 1,644.5896 1,642.8921 63.14 60.88 0.338
2nd NYU 1,612.0237 1,612.9224 1,612.4730 67.21 58.72 0.299
3rd Carnegie Mellon 1,604.5838 1,596.1930 1,600.3829 62.37 56.65 0.273
4th WashU 1,576.7435 1,577.4581 1,577.1008 63.85 55.83 0.255
5th CWRU 1,559.3476 1,560.4400 1,559.8937 63.12 55.40 0.238
6th UChicago 1,554.7250 1,551.4862 1,553.1048 63.15 53.62 0.219
7th Rochester (NY) 1,470.6114 1,464.3910 1,467.4979 59.98 51.35 0.132
8th Brandeis 1,383.1546 1,383.8780 1,383.5163 54.89 46.48 0.051

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Emory 0.3364 46.06 12.42 43.17 37.04 3.20 10.13
2nd WashU 0.3288 42.40 9.52 38.97 41.12 2.65 9.05
3rd NYU 0.3211 42.25 10.14 38.66 45.01 3.34 14.19
4th Carnegie Mellon 0.2975 41.70 11.95 37.51 45.29 3.35 12.01
5th CWRU 0.2785 40.33 12.48 37.46 44.31 3.39 9.87
6th UChicago 0.2767 39.70 12.02 36.31 44.21 3.34 9.39
7th Rochester (NY) 0.2368 39.36 15.69 36.51 44.14 4.18 14.71
8th Brandeis 0.2096 36.36 15.39 33.58 44.46 3.75 10.53

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Emory -0.0017 19.81 19.98 19.43 61.33 7.13 5.42
2nd NYU 0.0221 23.29 21.07 21.42 59.36 8.40 6.84
3rd Carnegie Mellon 0.0244 21.56 19.12 19.39 65.17 5.14 5.37
4th CWRU 0.0408 23.54 19.46 22.15 58.89 6.44 5.93
5th UChicago 0.0575 24.86 19.10 23.23 59.68 6.36 6.46
6th WashU 0.0740 23.19 15.79 22.57 61.76 4.21 6.66
7th Rochester (NY) 0.1050 27.11 16.61 24.81 59.33 3.47 8.56
8th Brandeis 0.1583 31.31 15.47 28.46 50.75 4.71 7.99

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,549.6077 1,561.7422 1,572.6205 1,568.4973 1,563.1169
Difference 12.1345 23.0129 18.8896 18.0123

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
NYU 58 1,388 843 165 136 60.74 8.4 10.2 1,084 500 82 75 53.88 13.2 14.5
Emory 38 923 516 72 71 55.91 12.8 13.0 739 334 54 77 54.80 13.7 9.6
CWRU 60 1,364 789 114 94 57.85 12.0 14.5 1,158 584 84 104 49.57 13.8 11.1
Rochester (NY) 57 1,282 742 170 143 57.88 7.5 9.0 1,162 612 110 94 47.33 10.6 12.4
Carnegie Mellon 52 1,212 668 110 127 55.12 11.0 9.5 1,017 509 68 93 49.95 15.0 10.9
WashU 55 1,244 676 76 83 54.34 16.4 15.0 1,189 614 96 87 48.36 12.4 13.7
UChicago 61 1,285 684 78 124 53.23 16.5 10.4 1,324 717 111 119 45.85 11.9 11.1
Brandeis 48 919 482 87 95 52.45 10.6 9.7 976 560 95 103 42.62 10.3 9.5
Conference Average 54 1,202 675 109 109 55.94 11.9 11.4 1,081 554 88 94 49.04 12.6 11.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the UAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

73.21

2023-09-24 Cleveland, OH
NYU
WashU
3
1
25
16
22
25
25
22
25
15
GAME

72.33

2023-09-23
CWRU
WashU
0
3
23
25
23
25
23
25
GAME

71.54

2023-09-24 Cleveland, OH
Emory
Carnegie Mellon
3
2
22
25
25
23
19
25
25
19
15
10
GAME

69.71

2023-09-23
CWRU
NYU
3
0
25
20
25
19
25
20
GAME

69.70

2023-09-23 Cleveland, OH
UChicago
Emory
0
3
26
28
26
28
22
25
GAME

67.95

2023-09-23 Cleveland, OH
Emory
Rochester (NY)
3
1
25
21
25
19
29
31
25
21
GAME

65.90

2023-09-23 Cleveland, OH
Carnegie Mellon
UChicago
3
1
25
23
19
25
25
17
25
22
GAME

64.49

2023-09-23 Cleveland, OH
Brandeis
WashU
0
3
20
25
17
25
20
25
GAME

64.22

2023-09-24 Cleveland, OH
UChicago
Rochester (NY)
3
0
25
14
25
21
25
12
GAME

64.13

2023-09-24
CWRU
Brandeis
3
0
25
20
25
14
25
21

HuskerGeek UAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 13.8718
2 12.9418
3 12.3273
4 11.6831
5 10.5847
6 9.5987
7 9.4467
8 9.3460
9 8.9041
10 8.4784

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 8.4365
2 8.2410
3 6.9005
4 6.7037
5 5.8627
6 5.0461
7 4.9976
8 4.5794
9 4.5306
10 4.4749

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 8.6752
2 7.9416
3 7.8672
4 6.0413
5 5.7665
6 5.6308
7 5.6236
8 5.5110
9 5.4110
10 5.3860

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2617
2 0.2241
3 0.2124
4 0.2122
5 0.1825
6 0.1730
7 0.1700
8 0.1684
9 0.1657
10 0.1654

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1555
2 0.1534
3 0.1219
4 0.1131
5 0.1031
6 0.1029
7 0.0980
8 0.0946
9 0.0885
10 0.0831

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1496
2 0.1444
3 0.1417
4 0.1380
5 0.1104
6 0.1062
7 0.1034
8 0.1022
9 0.1008
10 0.0990


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek