Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

UMAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Northwestern-St. Paul 1,438.5517 1,437.4750 1,438.0133 54.87 66.52 0.194
2nd Minn.-Morris 1,374.9541 1,371.1634 1,373.0575 53.84 63.19 0.165
3rd Martin Luther 1,355.4030 1,352.9188 1,354.1603 49.90 61.87 0.122
4th St. Scholastica 1,352.8345 1,354.4697 1,353.6518 52.95 60.38 0.116
5th Bethany Lutheran 1,227.6474 1,229.6110 1,228.6288 46.13 52.04 -0.022
6th Crown (MN) 1,075.5485 1,083.8996 1,079.7160 35.12 44.03 -0.214
7th North Central (MN) 1,010.6033 1,001.8392 1,006.2117 35.68 38.56 -0.267
8th Northland 981.7256 995.7556 988.7157 34.74 38.42 -0.302

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Northwestern-St. Paul 0.2879 41.95 13.17 38.79 46.83 3.33 7.86
2nd Minn.-Morris 0.2647 38.79 12.32 35.26 49.98 3.06 10.30
3rd Martin Luther 0.2388 37.92 14.05 35.08 47.73 4.19 7.50
4th St. Scholastica 0.2211 35.61 13.50 31.81 50.87 3.73 7.98
5th Bethany Lutheran 0.1317 32.18 19.01 29.19 54.37 4.72 7.10
6th Crown (MN) 0.0629 29.16 22.87 27.38 55.14 5.44 8.29
7th North Central (MN) -0.0007 23.19 23.26 21.23 63.88 5.89 6.61
8th Northland -0.0349 21.89 25.38 19.21 63.04 4.51 8.63

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Northwestern-St. Paul 0.0940 26.90 17.50 25.45 57.12 7.00 4.42
2nd Minn.-Morris 0.0999 26.02 16.03 23.78 58.64 5.70 5.24
3rd St. Scholastica 0.1049 26.05 15.56 23.37 59.25 4.39 5.90
4th Martin Luther 0.1172 28.32 16.60 26.63 55.30 6.32 6.02
5th Bethany Lutheran 0.1541 32.66 17.25 29.20 54.41 6.43 7.14
6th North Central (MN) 0.2659 40.04 13.45 36.78 50.10 2.14 11.77
7th Northland 0.2673 41.45 14.72 36.52 44.24 3.54 12.21
8th Crown (MN) 0.2769 40.69 13.00 36.63 50.30 2.39 11.47

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,227.7694 1,232.5710 1,254.0392 1,291.1403 1,251.3800
Difference 4.8016 26.2698 63.3709 31.4808

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Minn.-Morris 113 1,885 970 219 243 51.46 8.6 7.8 1,587 661 134 214 58.35 11.8 7.4
Northwestern-St. Paul 132 2,503 1,234 168 181 49.30 14.9 13.8 2,187 892 146 213 59.21 15.0 10.3
Martin Luther 99 1,779 859 138 105 48.29 12.9 16.9 1,622 688 129 161 57.58 12.6 10.1
St. Scholastica 102 2,065 1,017 133 127 49.25 15.5 16.3 1,921 872 139 179 54.61 13.8 10.7
Bethany Lutheran 78 1,297 588 88 107 45.34 14.7 12.1 1,473 768 140 151 47.86 10.5 9.8
North Central (MN) 75 1,164 469 88 111 40.29 13.2 10.5 1,719 1,052 213 138 38.80 8.1 12.5
Crown (MN) 90 1,240 458 120 145 36.94 10.3 8.6 1,831 1,073 251 193 41.40 7.3 9.5
Northland 86 1,145 434 107 165 37.90 10.7 6.9 1,823 1,144 243 173 37.25 7.5 10.5
Conference Average 97 1,635 754 133 148 44.85 12.6 11.6 1,770 894 174 178 49.38 10.8 10.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the UMAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

70.31

2013-09-28 New Ulm, Minn.
Martin Luther
Northwestern-St. Paul
2
3
23
25
26
24
17
25
28
26
10
15
GAME

67.61

2013-10-05 St. Paul, Minn.
Northwestern-St. Paul
Minn.-Morris
2
3
29
27
26
24
23
25
16
25
11
15
GAME

67.26

2013-11-02 Morris, Minn.
Minn.-Morris
Northwestern-St. Paul
1
3
19
25
20
25
26
24
15
25
GAME

66.84

2013-11-09 St. Paul, Minn.
Northwestern-St. Paul
Minn.-Morris
3
1
25
22
25
21
23
25
25
18
GAME

64.38

2013-10-25 Duluth, MN
St. Scholastica
Northwestern-St. Paul
1
3
25
20
23
25
14
25
23
25
GAME

63.91

2013-10-19 St. Paul, Minn.
Northwestern-St. Paul
Martin Luther
3
1
25
23
25
13
23
25
25
21
GAME

63.73

2013-11-02 New Ulm, Minn.
Martin Luther
St. Scholastica
3
0
25
20
25
22
25
23
GAME

63.33

2013-09-21 Morris, Minn.
Minn.-Morris
Martin Luther
3
0
27
25
25
17
25
22
GAME

62.31

2013-11-06 St. Paul, Minn.
Northwestern-St. Paul
St. Scholastica
3
1
25
18
25
14
23
25
25
19
GAME

62.31

2013-11-06 Morris, Minn.
Minn.-Morris
Martin Luther
3
0
25
21
25
22
25
21

HuskerGeek UMAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 20.5288
2 20.0899
3 16.8675
4 16.7778
5 16.3746
6 14.8754
7 14.0993
8 13.2080
9 12.4049
10 12.2405

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.7034
2 10.7752
3 9.9109
4 8.1155
5 7.4673
6 7.2234
7 6.9122
8 6.8436
9 6.6032
10 6.5913

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.0190
2 12.6813
3 10.4545
4 9.7029
5 9.3147
6 8.7520
7 7.4336
8 7.2557
9 6.9064
10 6.8254

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2679
2 0.1883
3 0.1883
4 0.1794
5 0.1730
6 0.1693
7 0.1632
8 0.1549
9 0.1508
10 0.1489

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1437
2 0.1257
3 0.1255
4 0.0898
5 0.0867
6 0.0863
7 0.0805
8 0.0762
9 0.0752
10 0.0752

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1651
2 0.1626
3 0.1242
4 0.1228
5 0.1096
6 0.1005
7 0.0950
8 0.0931
9 0.0885
10 0.0863


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek