Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

WCC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st BYU 1,627.2856 1,623.3083 1,625.2957 79.55 83.89 0.254
2nd San Diego 1,615.7268 1,612.3356 1,614.0303 80.35 79.38 0.216
3rd Pepperdine 1,609.7929 1,606.6783 1,608.2349 75.59 85.38 0.201
4th LMU (CA) 1,552.4395 1,548.6584 1,550.5478 71.14 81.30 0.151
5th Gonzaga 1,507.9513 1,504.1787 1,506.0638 73.99 76.50 0.121
6th San Francisco 1,499.2077 1,495.7973 1,497.5015 73.56 76.32 0.104
7th Saint Mary's (CA) 1,485.2217 1,481.8264 1,483.5231 75.35 72.54 0.070
8th Pacific 1,477.0113 1,474.3007 1,475.6554 71.63 72.31 0.052
9th Santa Clara 1,452.8735 1,449.1915 1,451.0313 68.65 73.29 0.074
10th Portland 1,425.0805 1,421.4478 1,423.2630 71.33 73.57 0.050

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st BYU 0.4325 45.78 2.53 42.80 44.21 3.38 8.86
2nd Pepperdine 0.3869 43.95 5.26 41.19 42.93 4.22 8.16
3rd San Diego 0.3859 44.24 5.65 40.80 43.19 4.32 9.00
4th LMU (CA) 0.3776 43.95 6.19 40.50 43.44 5.51 8.96
5th Gonzaga 0.3423 39.36 5.13 36.10 49.40 4.80 8.20
6th Santa Clara 0.3267 39.99 7.32 36.69 48.30 4.82 10.59
7th San Francisco 0.3135 37.86 6.51 35.66 48.77 5.16 8.33
8th Saint Mary's (CA) 0.3017 35.95 5.79 32.59 52.34 5.40 9.93
9th Portland 0.2811 34.70 6.59 32.30 53.21 4.84 7.96
10th Pacific 0.2407 36.71 12.64 33.47 45.89 7.56 8.44

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st San Diego 0.1701 27.62 10.61 25.04 54.99 7.11 4.87
2nd BYU 0.1786 28.08 10.22 26.55 56.74 7.32 5.67
3rd Pepperdine 0.1857 27.48 8.91 26.01 56.48 5.93 4.17
4th Pacific 0.1888 25.01 6.13 22.69 61.44 4.25 2.32
5th San Francisco 0.2091 28.18 7.27 26.03 56.04 4.87 3.78
6th Gonzaga 0.2217 29.78 7.61 26.50 53.74 5.48 4.50
7th LMU (CA) 0.2263 31.21 8.58 29.18 52.26 6.09 6.68
8th Portland 0.2307 29.64 6.57 27.40 55.58 4.56 6.00
9th Saint Mary's (CA) 0.2312 30.70 7.58 27.47 52.82 5.67 5.90
10th Santa Clara 0.2522 32.95 7.74 30.33 48.84 5.95 6.13

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,523.5147 1,523.3235 1,520.2544 1,509.4090 1,519.1254
Difference -0.1912 -3.2603 -14.1056 -5.8524

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
BYU 63 1,482 768 99 150 51.82 15.0 9.9 1,307 536 93 116 58.99 14.1 11.3
Pepperdine 76 1,551 752 101 171 48.49 15.4 9.1 1,356 535 80 173 60.55 17.0 7.8
San Diego 66 1,350 696 111 146 51.56 12.2 9.2 1,183 538 89 176 54.52 13.3 6.7
LMU (CA) 62 1,310 630 93 164 48.09 14.1 8.0 1,216 536 101 163 55.92 12.0 7.5
Gonzaga 73 1,554 729 94 160 46.91 16.5 9.7 1,609 767 99 161 52.33 16.3 10.0
San Francisco 70 1,363 624 92 198 45.78 14.8 6.9 1,413 680 88 156 51.88 16.1 9.1
Pacific 38 627 292 44 95 46.57 14.3 6.6 645 324 30 102 49.77 21.5 6.3
Portland 61 1,147 501 67 120 43.68 17.1 9.6 1,331 684 108 157 48.61 12.3 8.5
Saint Mary's (CA) 63 1,109 524 100 132 47.25 11.1 8.4 1,277 717 107 171 43.85 11.9 7.5
Santa Clara 65 1,029 426 114 187 41.40 9.0 5.5 1,151 583 110 139 49.35 10.5 8.3
Conference Average 64 1,252 594 92 152 47.15 13.9 8.3 1,249 590 91 151 52.58 14.5 8.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the WCC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

79.67

2021-02-24 Malibu, Calif.
Pepperdine
BYU
2
3
26
24
23
25
25
19
21
25
13
15
GAME

75.08

2021-01-27
LMU (CA)
Saint Mary's (CA)
2
3
25
21
23
25
30
28
20
25
15
17
GAME

73.51

2021-03-20
San Francisco
Gonzaga
3
1
22
25
25
23
25
22
30
28
GAME

73.45

2021-01-27 Malibu, Calif.
Pepperdine
San Francisco
3
1
23
25
31
29
25
17
25
22
GAME

72.77

2021-02-20
Gonzaga
San Diego
2
3
25
21
17
25
19
25
25
20
10
15
GAME

72.57

2021-03-27
Saint Mary's (CA)
BYU
0
3
19
25
23
25
21
25
GAME

71.86

2021-02-24
Gonzaga
LMU (CA)
1
3
25
20
23
25
24
26
23
25
GAME

71.59

2021-03-06
San Francisco
BYU
1
3
15
25
25
20
24
26
18
25
GAME

71.42

2021-03-26
San Diego
Pepperdine
1
3
25
19
20
25
23
25
21
25
GAME

71.05

2021-03-13
LMU (CA)
San Diego
3
2
22
25
25
22
22
25
25
21
16
14

HuskerGeek WCC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 17.4939
2 17.0072
3 14.1009
4 12.8962
5 12.8195
6 12.5566
7 12.3879
8 12.1406
9 11.9951
10 11.9204

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 10.3862
2 9.9021
3 9.7845
4 8.3797
5 7.5788
6 7.2827
7 7.1476
8 7.0652
9 6.4568
10 6.3306

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.0263
2 10.0225
3 8.9743
4 8.8959
5 8.1444
6 7.6440
7 7.1077
8 7.1051
9 6.8460
10 6.7021

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2777
2 0.2538
3 0.2136
4 0.2047
5 0.1958
6 0.1941
7 0.1927
8 0.1913
9 0.1904
10 0.1874

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1649
2 0.1478
3 0.1460
4 0.1403
5 0.1256
6 0.1251
7 0.1187
8 0.1161
9 0.1121
10 0.1089

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1758
2 0.1750
3 0.1328
4 0.1293
5 0.1268
6 0.1229
7 0.1202
8 0.1128
9 0.1065
10 0.1064


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek