Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

WIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wis.-Whitewater 1,522.5505 1,540.1540 1,531.3269 60.66 69.34 0.304
2nd Wis.-Stevens Point 1,506.2113 1,525.5983 1,515.8738 55.93 65.78 0.245
3rd Wis.-Oshkosh 1,490.4409 1,515.6816 1,503.0083 58.62 68.14 0.240
4th Wis.-Eau Claire 1,479.6718 1,503.2669 1,491.4227 57.74 66.09 0.223
5th Wis.-La Crosse 1,459.2867 1,475.9502 1,467.5948 55.04 67.28 0.244
6th Wis.-Stout 1,405.5745 1,414.5992 1,410.0797 53.90 63.02 0.184
7th Wis.-Platteville 1,374.6022 1,390.5433 1,382.5498 54.96 62.05 0.157
8th Wis.-River Falls 1,355.2228 1,387.2107 1,371.1235 50.62 62.20 0.117

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Wis.-Whitewater 0.3165 44.54 12.89 40.28 42.63 2.66 10.92
2nd Wis.-La Crosse 0.2874 43.19 14.45 39.85 42.38 3.72 9.76
3rd Wis.-Oshkosh 0.2870 40.04 11.34 36.39 46.81 3.50 7.23
4th Wis.-Eau Claire 0.2821 40.32 12.12 37.53 46.55 3.96 10.53
5th Wis.-Stevens Point 0.2720 39.29 12.09 36.51 47.83 3.14 9.82
6th Wis.-Stout 0.2630 38.95 12.65 35.16 48.64 4.32 7.48
7th Wis.-Platteville 0.2421 38.01 13.80 34.20 50.55 2.96 9.31
8th Wis.-River Falls 0.2391 38.03 14.12 34.56 49.37 3.84 8.94

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wis.-Whitewater 0.0126 21.35 20.08 20.17 63.82 6.59 4.22
2nd Wis.-Stevens Point 0.0271 21.42 18.71 20.53 66.07 5.73 5.52
3rd Wis.-La Crosse 0.0437 23.00 18.63 21.43 61.42 5.97 4.31
4th Wis.-Oshkosh 0.0470 23.97 19.27 22.24 61.72 7.08 4.39
5th Wis.-Eau Claire 0.0591 24.04 18.13 22.96 61.68 5.40 5.09
6th Wis.-Stout 0.0791 25.36 17.45 23.88 61.55 5.97 4.92
7th Wis.-Platteville 0.0851 26.01 17.51 24.26 57.37 5.49 4.46
8th Wis.-River Falls 0.1224 27.29 15.05 24.68 60.59 5.55 4.97

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,459.1224 1,461.7548 1,468.0264 1,479.5088 1,467.1031
Difference 2.6324 8.9039 20.3863 10.6409

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wis.-Whitewater 125 1,466 736 221 265 50.21 6.6 5.5 1,235 492 125 187 60.16 9.9 6.6
Wis.-Oshkosh 135 1,520 742 143 168 48.82 10.6 9.0 1,343 548 141 223 59.20 9.5 6.0
Wis.-Eau Claire 130 2,491 1,192 211 216 47.85 11.8 11.5 2,300 983 166 203 57.26 13.9 11.3
Wis.-La Crosse 103 1,927 858 143 255 44.53 13.5 7.6 1,871 789 121 182 57.83 15.5 10.3
Wis.-Platteville 113 1,594 722 148 221 45.30 10.8 7.2 1,638 764 148 220 53.36 11.1 7.4
Wis.-Stout 141 1,857 820 115 166 44.16 16.1 11.2 1,921 885 182 228 53.93 10.6 8.4
Wis.-River Falls 122 878 366 193 240 41.69 4.5 3.7 925 421 158 182 54.49 5.9 5.1
Conference Average 124 1,676 777 168 219 46.08 10.6 8.0 1,605 697 149 204 56.60 10.9 7.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the WIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

67.45

2015-09-30 La Crosse, Wis.
Wis.-La Crosse
Wis.-Stout
3
2
25
19
22
25
25
21
22
25
15
9
GAME

67.04

2015-10-10 Eau Claire, Wis.
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Oshkosh
1
3
25
21
14
25
14
25
20
25
GAME

66.77

2015-09-30
Wis.-Platteville
Wis.-Oshkosh
2
3
25
23
25
22
22
25
21
25
12
15
GAME

66.15

2015-11-06 Oshkosh, Wis.
Wis.-Whitewater
Wis.-La Crosse
3
1
25
19
23
25
25
16
25
20
GAME

66.08

2015-09-23 La Crosse, Wis.
Wis.-La Crosse
Wis.-Eau Claire
3
2
19
25
18
25
25
17
25
21
15
13
GAME

65.67

2015-10-30
Wis.-Platteville
Wis.-La Crosse
0
3
25
27
23
25
20
25
GAME

65.65

2015-10-30 Whitewater, Wis.
Wis.-Whitewater
Wis.-Eau Claire
3
0
25
23
25
13
25
18
GAME

64.36

2015-10-28 La Crosse, Wis.
Wis.-La Crosse
Wis.-Whitewater
3
0
25
19
25
22
25
17
GAME

63.53

2015-10-07 Oshkosh, Wis.
Wis.-Oshkosh
Wis.-La Crosse
3
0
25
20
25
20
25
20
GAME

63.23

2015-10-21
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Stout
3
1
17
25
25
13
25
19
25
23

HuskerGeek WIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.7894
2 18.9053
3 16.2717
4 13.1135
5 12.5626
6 12.4594
7 12.3893
8 12.3878
9 12.0726
10 11.8538

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.1347
2 9.0443
3 8.7559
4 8.6823
5 8.3541
6 8.1539
7 7.8550
8 7.6396
9 7.1491
10 6.7637

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.2917
2 11.5317
3 10.7514
4 9.5481
5 9.4497
6 9.4148
7 9.0618
8 8.6547
9 7.1158
10 7.1024

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2163
2 0.2044
3 0.1963
4 0.1849
5 0.1801
6 0.1749
7 0.1681
8 0.1639
9 0.1587
10 0.1577

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1376
2 0.1368
3 0.1172
4 0.1166
5 0.1085
6 0.1029
7 0.0981
8 0.0981
9 0.0960
10 0.0936

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1454
2 0.1425
3 0.1390
4 0.1372
5 0.1310
6 0.1239
7 0.1208
8 0.1163
9 0.1024
10 0.0960


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek