Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

WIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wis.-Whitewater 1,658.0623 1,657.7395 1,657.9009 66.30 61.41 0.319
2nd Wis.-Eau Claire 1,621.6311 1,615.9508 1,618.7885 61.79 59.42 0.286
3rd Wis.-Stevens Point 1,561.2510 1,561.5368 1,561.3939 60.90 55.97 0.215
4th Wis.-Oshkosh 1,535.2977 1,533.3416 1,534.3193 62.14 53.57 0.192
5th Wis.-La Crosse 1,518.6539 1,515.4410 1,517.0466 60.27 51.63 0.198
6th UW-River Falls 1,468.4331 1,465.2069 1,466.8191 54.37 57.98 0.122
7th Wis.-Platteville 1,463.3828 1,461.5294 1,462.4558 57.34 49.93 0.129
8th Wis.-Stout 1,443.4880 1,443.7120 1,443.6000 56.16 49.22 0.104

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Wis.-Eau Claire 0.3310 45.22 12.12 41.31 41.26 2.53 9.19
2nd Wis.-Whitewater 0.3260 43.61 11.00 39.84 43.82 2.35 11.04
3rd Wis.-Stevens Point 0.2796 40.65 12.69 37.38 45.01 2.50 11.29
4th Wis.-Oshkosh 0.2580 38.75 12.95 35.04 47.13 2.82 9.71
5th Wis.-La Crosse 0.2364 39.51 15.86 36.14 46.65 2.65 9.36
6th UW-River Falls 0.2310 37.32 14.22 33.96 47.99 3.00 10.31
7th Wis.-Stout 0.2258 37.08 14.50 32.45 47.42 3.75 8.59
8th Wis.-Platteville 0.2117 37.69 16.52 34.32 49.13 3.62 10.48

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wis.-Whitewater 0.0073 21.93 21.20 20.92 63.16 7.55 3.19
2nd Wis.-La Crosse 0.0386 21.86 18.01 20.02 62.24 5.61 3.99
3rd Wis.-Eau Claire 0.0453 22.96 18.43 21.28 59.17 7.14 4.65
4th Wis.-Stevens Point 0.0650 24.12 17.62 22.58 59.82 5.64 3.55
5th Wis.-Oshkosh 0.0655 24.46 17.91 22.01 58.24 6.16 4.61
6th Wis.-Platteville 0.0825 25.89 17.63 23.23 58.42 6.57 6.03
7th UW-River Falls 0.1092 26.72 15.80 23.72 56.40 4.30 5.92
8th Wis.-Stout 0.1216 28.66 16.50 25.63 55.99 4.84 5.21

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,532.7905 1,526.8039 1,519.8947 1,525.6829 1,526.2930
Difference -5.9866 -12.8958 -7.1076 -8.6633

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wis.-Whitewater 97 1,832 1,084 185 199 59.17 9.9 9.2 1,402 621 76 181 55.71 18.4 7.7
Wis.-Eau Claire 139 2,820 1,514 190 239 53.69 14.8 11.8 2,410 1,137 166 270 52.82 14.5 8.9
Wis.-Stevens Point 113 2,169 1,201 219 195 55.37 9.9 11.1 1,868 921 108 234 50.70 17.3 8.0
UW-River Falls 101 1,751 880 175 192 50.26 10.0 9.1 1,726 798 155 175 53.77 11.1 9.9
Wis.-Oshkosh 127 2,269 1,257 188 211 55.40 12.1 10.8 2,170 1,134 169 268 47.74 12.8 8.1
Wis.-La Crosse 110 2,114 1,169 188 270 55.30 11.2 7.8 1,937 1,035 117 214 46.57 16.6 9.1
Wis.-Platteville 109 1,939 1,028 198 271 53.02 9.8 7.2 1,960 1,061 172 179 45.87 11.4 10.9
Wis.-Stout 98 1,534 801 136 178 52.22 11.3 8.6 1,600 878 138 184 45.13 11.6 8.7
Conference Average 112 2,054 1,117 185 219 54.30 11.1 9.5 1,884 948 138 213 49.79 14.2 8.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the WIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.20

2021-11-04
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Oshkosh
3
2
25
27
25
16
25
16
27
29
15
9
GAME

74.75

2021-11-06
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Whitewater
3
1
25
21
25
22
22
25
25
19
GAME

72.85

2021-10-06
Wis.-Oshkosh
Wis.-Platteville
3
2
25
21
25
27
20
25
25
21
15
11
GAME

72.80

2021-09-15
UW-River Falls
Wis.-Eau Claire
0
3
21
25
19
25
18
25
GAME

72.24

2021-10-20
Wis.-Oshkosh
Wis.-Stevens Point
3
2
16
25
21
25
25
20
25
22
15
13
GAME

72.09

2021-10-30
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Platteville
3
2
25
17
23
25
26
24
15
25
16
14
GAME

71.30

2021-11-02
Wis.-Oshkosh
Wis.-La Crosse
3
2
12
25
25
22
25
20
22
25
15
8
GAME

70.86

2021-10-29
UW-River Falls
Wis.-Oshkosh
1
3
25
27
19
25
25
20
16
25
GAME

70.45

2021-10-29
Wis.-Stevens Point
Wis.-La Crosse
3
1
25
22
25
21
19
25
25
22
GAME

70.24

2021-09-22
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Whitewater
3
0
25
22
25
19
25
21

HuskerGeek WIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.5286
2 22.7752
3 20.1490
4 19.8547
5 19.1525
6 18.5243
7 17.4387
8 15.7549
9 15.6518
10 15.2801

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.5575
2 13.9481
3 13.7111
4 11.6848
5 11.2779
6 10.3336
7 9.3594
8 8.4650
9 8.3707
10 7.9065

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.4571
2 15.5556
3 15.1014
4 12.7997
5 11.8890
6 10.4997
7 9.9712
8 9.8391
9 9.7162
10 9.1649

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2698
2 0.2679
3 0.2307
4 0.1971
5 0.1819
6 0.1814
7 0.1783
8 0.1773
9 0.1645
10 0.1586

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1646
2 0.1641
3 0.1440
4 0.1203
5 0.1083
6 0.1058
7 0.0998
8 0.0996
9 0.0949
10 0.0906

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1852
2 0.1510
3 0.1407
4 0.1351
5 0.1326
6 0.1295
7 0.1143
8 0.1117
9 0.1068
10 0.1052


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek