Nerdly Nebraska.

2022-2023 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Texas 1,730.6611

Football georgia 11.6118
Men's Basketball houston 9.4563
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.7610
Softball columbia 5.0000
Ice Hockey minnesota 8.5914
Men's Lacrosse marquette 7.9259
Men's Soccer kentucky 8.7687
Women's Soccer ucla 11.0741
Men's Volleyball long beach st 9.3011
Women's Volleyball texas 12.4762
Field Hockey north carolina 10.0384

WIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wis.-Whitewater 1,591.5306 1,590.0429 1,590.7866 62.95 58.66 0.274
2nd Wis.-Oshkosh 1,576.7331 1,571.6593 1,574.1942 63.17 56.49 0.232
3rd Wis.-Eau Claire 1,572.1567 1,574.3667 1,573.2613 63.31 56.28 0.242
4th Wis.-Stevens Point 1,572.2047 1,572.1890 1,572.1968 65.17 56.13 0.237
5th Wis.-Platteville 1,520.9698 1,519.6080 1,520.2887 61.63 53.30 0.198
6th UW-River Falls 1,484.5644 1,482.6673 1,483.6155 58.90 52.19 0.141
7th Wis.-Stout 1,470.9021 1,470.5394 1,470.7207 61.98 50.80 0.168
8th Wis.-La Crosse 1,471.9598 1,467.1316 1,469.5437 58.00 51.07 0.146

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Wis.-Whitewater 0.3051 43.08 12.58 39.79 43.57 3.16 12.95
2nd Wis.-Eau Claire 0.2982 42.72 12.90 39.21 42.96 3.22 9.94
3rd Wis.-Stevens Point 0.2752 40.21 12.69 36.83 44.39 2.95 12.38
4th Wis.-Oshkosh 0.2716 39.57 12.41 36.03 45.34 3.46 11.13
5th Wis.-Platteville 0.2458 39.71 15.14 35.25 43.26 3.23 11.78
6th Wis.-Stout 0.2457 37.41 12.84 34.38 48.07 3.05 12.21
7th Wis.-La Crosse 0.2354 40.59 17.05 37.30 43.31 3.21 10.45
8th UW-River Falls 0.2314 38.87 15.73 35.51 44.84 3.46 10.80

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wis.-Whitewater 0.0309 22.30 19.22 20.71 62.70 6.80 4.77
2nd Wis.-Stevens Point 0.0379 22.26 18.47 21.01 65.24 5.53 5.12
3rd Wis.-Oshkosh 0.0399 21.60 17.60 20.33 65.04 5.22 4.78
4th Wis.-Platteville 0.0477 23.88 19.11 21.74 59.57 5.95 5.80
5th Wis.-Eau Claire 0.0565 23.53 17.88 21.51 62.14 5.27 5.07
6th Wis.-Stout 0.0778 26.00 18.22 24.01 59.50 5.36 7.60
7th Wis.-La Crosse 0.0896 26.23 17.27 23.72 59.03 5.15 5.63
8th UW-River Falls 0.0904 26.22 17.18 24.33 59.47 4.97 4.62

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,531.8259 1,532.3795 1,537.3406 1,546.2428 1,536.9472
Difference 0.5536 5.5147 14.4168 6.8284

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wis.-Stevens Point 129 2,941 1,692 253 219 57.53 11.6 13.4 2,600 1,325 181 229 49.04 14.4 11.4
Wis.-Oshkosh 141 3,105 1,757 267 215 56.59 11.6 14.4 2,713 1,359 189 261 49.91 14.4 10.4
Wis.-Whitewater 129 3,010 1,662 287 315 55.22 10.5 9.6 2,610 1,276 169 234 51.11 15.4 11.2
Wis.-Eau Claire 111 2,563 1,420 166 179 55.40 15.4 14.3 2,315 1,191 150 207 48.55 15.4 11.2
Wis.-Platteville 113 2,562 1,436 229 254 56.05 11.2 10.1 2,381 1,268 177 196 46.75 13.5 12.1
UW-River Falls 123 2,712 1,478 225 208 54.50 12.1 13.0 2,559 1,364 165 191 46.70 15.5 13.4
Wis.-Stout 104 2,232 1,246 198 241 55.82 11.3 9.3 2,249 1,254 206 193 44.24 10.9 11.7
Wis.-La Crosse 105 2,042 1,062 166 195 52.01 12.3 10.5 2,106 1,183 182 194 43.83 11.6 10.9
Conference Average 119 2,646 1,469 224 228 55.39 12.0 11.8 2,442 1,278 177 213 47.52 13.9 11.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the WIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.34

2022-11-03
Wis.-Oshkosh
Wis.-Stevens Point
2
3
27
25
13
25
25
18
23
25
14
16
GAME

75.38

2022-09-30
Wis.-Stevens Point
Wis.-Oshkosh
1
3
25
16
23
25
27
29
21
25
GAME

75.22

2022-10-14
Wis.-Stevens Point
Wis.-Eau Claire
3
1
25
21
17
25
25
16
26
24
GAME

72.94

2022-09-21
Wis.-Whitewater
Wis.-Stevens Point
3
2
17
25
25
17
25
18
25
27
15
9
GAME

71.33

2022-10-28
Wis.-La Crosse
Wis.-Stevens Point
1
3
23
25
17
25
25
18
23
25
GAME

71.22

2022-10-28
Wis.-Whitewater
Wis.-Eau Claire
3
0
26
24
25
18
25
23
GAME

70.99

2022-10-19
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Oshkosh
1
3
17
25
25
27
25
19
21
25
GAME

70.41

2022-11-05
Wis.-Whitewater
Wis.-Stevens Point
3
1
25
20
25
22
23
25
25
13
GAME

70.21

2022-11-01
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Platteville
1
3
25
21
23
25
23
25
24
26
GAME

70.03

2022-09-14
Wis.-Platteville
Wis.-Eau Claire
1
3
26
24
21
25
15
25
15
25

HuskerGeek WIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 34.4087
2 27.7453
3 25.7715
4 23.6250
5 23.3666
6 22.4410
7 22.2588
8 21.2663
9 21.2277
10 20.6637

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.2508
2 15.3246
3 15.1453
4 14.3734
5 12.9402
6 12.0310
7 11.8320
8 11.2823
9 10.6996
10 10.3803

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.3142
2 21.2419
3 17.3335
4 16.2974
5 15.1579
6 14.0402
7 13.8689
8 12.4207
9 12.3427
10 12.0051

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2667
2 0.2500
3 0.1952
4 0.1895
5 0.1875
6 0.1835
7 0.1811
8 0.1770
9 0.1767
10 0.1748

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1492
2 0.1381
3 0.1193
4 0.1089
5 0.1056
6 0.1052
7 0.0969
8 0.0969
9 0.0962
10 0.0935

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1647
2 0.1579
3 0.1468
4 0.1387
5 0.1337
6 0.1284
7 0.1175
8 0.1166
9 0.1137
10 0.1119


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek