Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,724.6136

Football ohio st 10.8908
Ice Hockey michigan 5.0000
Men's Soccer marshall 10.0965
Women's Soccer penn st 9.9817
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.7753
Field Hockey northwestern 9.9036

WIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wis.-Oshkosh 1,683.9783 1,680.2087 1,682.0924 75.21 52.98 0.333
2nd Wis.-Whitewater 1,682.0230 1,677.9001 1,679.9603 80.46 49.07 0.362
3rd Wis.-Stevens Point 1,647.8287 1,645.6923 1,646.7602 76.62 47.93 0.285
4th UW-River Falls 1,601.3450 1,596.6700 1,599.0058 77.41 40.68 0.230
5th Wis.-Platteville 1,589.7356 1,587.6772 1,588.7060 71.74 45.64 0.224
6th Wis.-Eau Claire 1,578.7284 1,572.8012 1,575.7620 73.94 45.97 0.241
7th Wis.-Stout 1,522.3155 1,526.9511 1,524.6315 73.86 42.50 0.186
8th Wis.-La Crosse 1,495.1639 1,493.6703 1,494.4170 73.25 39.56 0.170

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Wis.-Oshkosh 0.3462 45.85 11.24 42.58 39.67 3.27 10.26
2nd Wis.-Whitewater 0.3220 45.06 12.86 40.24 41.81 2.90 13.05
3rd Wis.-Platteville 0.2900 45.68 16.69 41.54 36.83 4.04 12.80
4th Wis.-Eau Claire 0.2804 41.69 13.66 38.72 44.15 3.37 10.80
5th UW-River Falls 0.2796 40.38 12.43 36.03 43.31 2.37 9.57
6th Wis.-Stevens Point 0.2782 40.73 12.91 37.61 44.97 2.66 12.14
7th Wis.-Stout 0.2526 36.85 11.59 33.98 50.25 2.10 10.33
8th Wis.-La Crosse 0.2467 40.84 16.17 37.55 44.33 3.80 9.82

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wis.-Whitewater -0.0401 18.77 22.78 17.61 61.98 8.82 5.85
2nd Wis.-Stevens Point -0.0066 18.65 19.30 17.32 67.70 5.92 6.94
3rd Wis.-Oshkosh 0.0133 20.14 18.81 18.51 64.90 6.00 4.61
4th Wis.-Eau Claire 0.0393 22.57 18.64 20.66 62.64 5.90 5.20
5th UW-River Falls 0.0492 22.66 17.75 20.37 61.13 5.05 4.78
6th Wis.-Platteville 0.0660 24.83 18.23 22.05 60.11 6.71 5.94
7th Wis.-Stout 0.0665 24.63 17.97 22.47 61.11 5.27 7.45
8th Wis.-La Crosse 0.0769 26.31 18.62 24.55 56.83 5.89 7.77

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,598.9169 1,602.4710 1,602.5585 1,593.8559 1,599.4506
Difference 3.5541 3.6416 -5.0610 0.7116

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wis.-Whitewater 50 1,197 710 122 122 59.32 9.8 9.8 967 476 66 82 50.78 14.7 11.8
Wis.-Oshkosh 71 1,690 912 122 124 53.96 13.9 13.6 1,387 623 82 129 55.08 16.9 10.8
Wis.-Stevens Point 59 1,211 684 127 133 56.48 9.5 9.1 1,038 509 91 132 50.96 11.4 7.9
Wis.-Stout 61 1,364 809 117 148 59.31 11.7 9.2 1,163 606 90 127 47.89 12.9 9.2
UW-River Falls 61 1,387 831 108 91 59.91 12.8 15.2 1,135 620 68 84 45.37 16.7 13.5
Wis.-Platteville 67 1,523 832 165 136 54.63 9.2 11.2 1,346 689 95 96 48.81 14.2 14.0
Wis.-Eau Claire 55 1,225 653 96 141 53.31 12.8 8.7 1,173 603 78 106 48.59 15.0 11.1
Wis.-La Crosse 79 1,708 972 148 139 56.91 11.5 12.3 1,614 891 144 160 44.80 11.2 10.1
Conference Average 63 1,413 800 126 129 56.73 11.4 11.1 1,228 627 89 115 49.04 14.1 11.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the WIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.29

2023-09-20
Wis.-Whitewater
Wis.-Oshkosh
0
3
22
25
23
25
17
25
GAME

73.33

2023-09-26
Wis.-Oshkosh
Wis.-Stevens Point
3
1
25
13
14
25
25
18
26
24
GAME

72.93

2023-09-20
Wis.-Stevens Point
UW-River Falls
3
0
28
26
25
23
25
19
GAME

72.44

2023-09-27
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Platteville
2
3
25
20
15
25
25
22
26
28
12
15
GAME

69.83

2023-09-27
UW-River Falls
Wis.-Stout
3
2
25
20
25
12
10
25
22
25
15
9
GAME

68.47

2023-09-20
Wis.-La Crosse
Wis.-Platteville
1
3
20
25
20
25
26
24
17
25
GAME

67.93

2023-09-20
Wis.-Stout
Wis.-Eau Claire
2
3
14
25
15
25
25
22
27
25
11
15
GAME

66.94

2023-09-27
Wis.-Whitewater
Wis.-La Crosse
3
0
25
14
25
14
25
20

HuskerGeek WIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 15.9112
2 14.2110
3 13.8981
4 13.6838
5 12.5938
6 11.0818
7 10.7602
8 10.5706
9 10.3332
10 10.1945

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.0604
2 8.6509
3 8.5321
4 7.9153
5 7.7912
6 6.7123
7 6.5936
8 6.0669
9 5.8750
10 5.5880

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 10.1895
2 7.5861
3 7.3002
4 7.2603
5 7.1541
6 7.0337
7 7.0290
8 6.2316
9 6.1069
10 6.0538

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2622
2 0.2243
3 0.2121
4 0.2014
5 0.1908
6 0.1817
7 0.1764
8 0.1692
9 0.1595
10 0.1565

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1470
2 0.1399
3 0.1352
4 0.1199
5 0.1109
6 0.1095
7 0.1017
8 0.0984
9 0.0979
10 0.0948

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1435
2 0.1435
3 0.1301
4 0.1256
5 0.1246
6 0.1237
7 0.1204
8 0.1152
9 0.1152
10 0.0992


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek