Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Western Athletic - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st New Mexico St. 1,515.9506 1,509.5795 1,512.7617 46.79 64.15 0.108
2nd Idaho 1,487.0630 1,471.9674 1,479.4959 46.15 61.59 0.080
3rd Fresno St. 1,438.4634 1,436.6380 1,437.5504 44.79 58.60 0.032
4th Utah St. 1,413.7472 1,400.2911 1,407.0031 44.14 57.90 0.041
5th San Jose St. 1,401.3732 1,389.7886 1,395.5689 43.12 58.33 0.032
6th Nevada 1,362.5400 1,350.4449 1,356.4790 41.06 56.24 -0.035
7th Louisiana Tech 1,260.5631 1,244.8482 1,252.6810 37.06 51.05 -0.115

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st New Mexico St. 0.2500 41.08 16.08 38.16 42.98 5.93 5.25
2nd Idaho 0.2415 38.51 14.36 35.83 48.42 4.53 4.68
3rd San Jose St. 0.2242 37.81 15.38 35.11 48.15 5.09 5.42
4th Fresno St. 0.2193 39.76 17.82 37.72 44.36 6.09 7.22
5th Utah St. 0.2041 34.56 14.15 32.11 52.35 5.10 4.41
6th Nevada 0.1937 37.18 17.81 34.57 47.51 6.28 5.93
7th Louisiana Tech 0.1158 28.48 16.90 26.05 58.03 6.41 5.23

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st New Mexico St. 0.1421 32.34 18.13 29.61 52.64 7.00 5.08
2nd Idaho 0.1612 33.28 17.16 31.18 50.84 7.09 4.95
3rd Utah St. 0.1627 33.87 17.60 31.70 49.54 7.19 4.67
4th Fresno St. 0.1874 34.57 15.84 32.47 50.22 6.62 6.39
5th San Jose St. 0.1924 34.88 15.64 31.86 50.13 5.50 5.75
6th Nevada 0.2292 37.83 14.91 34.55 47.41 5.95 5.90
7th Louisiana Tech 0.2307 37.80 14.73 35.23 48.22 4.11 6.74

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,405.9343 1,415.2195 1,413.3741 1,407.0031 1,410.3827
Difference 9.2852 7.4398 1.0688 5.9313

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
New Mexico St. 102 2,380 1,099 126 149 46.18 18.9 16.0 2,117 805 107 170 61.97 19.8 12.5
Idaho 94 2,105 938 99 149 44.56 21.3 14.1 1,993 821 101 155 58.81 19.7 12.9
Fresno St. 96 2,062 919 151 214 44.57 13.7 9.6 2,031 889 130 169 56.23 15.6 12.0
Utah St. 103 2,180 942 103 153 43.21 21.2 14.2 2,251 1,010 110 180 55.13 20.5 12.5
San Jose St. 99 2,108 885 113 196 41.98 18.7 10.8 2,187 970 130 178 55.65 16.8 12.3
Louisiana Tech 105 2,063 851 135 182 41.25 15.3 11.3 2,280 1,090 152 219 52.19 15.0 10.4
Nevada 85 1,775 706 107 176 39.78 16.6 10.1 1,960 912 119 168 53.47 16.5 11.7
Conference Average 98 2,096 906 119 174 43.08 17.9 12.3 2,117 928 121 177 56.21 17.7 12.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Western Athletic

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

69.26

2011-11-05 Logan, Utah
Utah St.
Idaho
2
3
26
24
19
25
26
24
25
27
8
15
GAME

67.91

2011-10-21 San Jose, Calif.
San Jose St.
Idaho
3
2
25
23
18
25
25
18
19
25
15
12
GAME

67.59

2011-11-10 Fresno, CA
Fresno St.
Idaho
1
3
23
25
25
20
21
25
23
25
GAME

67.40

2011-10-27 Logan, Utah
Utah St.
New Mexico St.
3
2
25
21
19
25
25
18
19
25
18
16
GAME

67.37

2011-11-22 Las Vegas, Nev.
Idaho
New Mexico St.
0
3
22
25
22
25
16
25
GAME

66.92

2011-10-29 Moscow, Idaho
Idaho
New Mexico St.
3
1
19
25
25
23
25
14
25
14
GAME

66.70

2011-09-29 Las Cruces, N.M.
New Mexico St.
Idaho
3
1
25
18
14
25
25
23
25
22
GAME

65.73

2011-11-12 Fresno, CA
Fresno St.
Utah St.
3
2
25
21
25
19
20
25
24
26
15
9
GAME

65.66

2011-11-10 San Jose, Calif.
San Jose St.
New Mexico St.
0
3
23
25
25
27
16
25
GAME

64.77

2011-10-29 Fresno, CA
Fresno St.
San Jose St.
3
1
20
25
25
22
25
21
25
13

HuskerGeek Western Athletic All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.6199
2 21.8259
3 17.4638
4 16.5170
5 16.1609
6 16.0186
7 15.7516
8 15.4958
9 15.0931
10 14.4631

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.7387
2 13.4178
3 10.8579
4 10.7160
5 10.5810
6 10.2376
7 9.6873
8 9.3069
9 8.9729
10 8.8742

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 13.3676
2 13.0438
3 11.1019
4 10.7999
5 9.5294
6 9.4381
7 8.4082
8 8.3510
9 8.1569
10 8.1028

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2316
2 0.2140
3 0.2040
4 0.1823
5 0.1800
6 0.1757
7 0.1719
8 0.1712
9 0.1683
10 0.1641

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1543
2 0.1315
3 0.1277
4 0.1213
5 0.1116
6 0.1069
7 0.1066
8 0.1031
9 0.0936
10 0.0915

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1388
2 0.1350
3 0.1311
4 0.1121
5 0.1110
6 0.0983
7 0.0931
8 0.0917
9 0.0884
10 0.0853


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek