Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Western Athletic - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st New Mexico St. 1,669.2102 1,661.6263 1,665.4139 46.79 63.10 0.098
2nd New Mexico St. 1,669.2102 1,661.6263 1,665.4139 46.79 63.10 0.098
3rd UTRGV 1,608.0096 1,608.1758 1,608.0927 44.11 59.20 0.051
4th UTRGV 1,608.0096 1,608.1758 1,608.0927 44.11 59.20 0.051
5th CSU Bakersfield 1,599.0365 1,597.7205 1,598.3783 42.79 58.44 0.005
6th CSU Bakersfield 1,599.0365 1,597.7205 1,598.3783 42.79 58.44 0.005
7th Utah Valley 1,598.0751 1,592.0396 1,595.0545 42.07 60.87 0.039
8th Utah Valley 1,598.0751 1,592.0396 1,595.0545 42.07 60.87 0.039
9th Seattle U 1,541.1257 1,530.3683 1,535.7376 38.90 57.59 -0.021
10th Seattle U 1,541.1257 1,530.3683 1,535.7376 38.90 57.59 -0.021
11th Grand Canyon 1,538.5179 1,525.6657 1,532.0783 41.09 55.73 -0.040
12th Grand Canyon 1,538.5179 1,525.6657 1,532.0783 41.09 55.73 -0.040
13th UMKC 1,536.3080 1,519.8833 1,528.0736 39.49 55.10 -0.049
14th UMKC 1,536.3080 1,519.8833 1,528.0736 39.49 55.10 -0.049
15th Chicago St. 1,495.2465 1,481.4165 1,488.3154 36.76 53.77 -0.128
16th Chicago St. 1,495.2465 1,481.4165 1,488.3154 36.76 53.77 -0.128

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st New Mexico St. 0.2444 38.73 14.29 36.61 46.99 5.39 5.23
2nd New Mexico St. 0.2444 38.73 14.29 36.61 46.99 5.39 5.23
3rd Utah Valley 0.2398 36.68 12.70 33.55 49.96 5.71 4.87
4th Utah Valley 0.2398 36.68 12.70 33.55 49.96 5.71 4.87
5th UTRGV 0.2273 36.91 14.18 34.58 48.84 5.83 4.95
6th UTRGV 0.2273 36.91 14.18 34.58 48.84 5.83 4.95
7th Seattle U 0.2091 36.73 15.82 34.72 49.14 6.64 5.73
8th Seattle U 0.2091 36.73 15.82 34.72 49.14 6.64 5.73
9th CSU Bakersfield 0.1936 35.05 15.69 32.96 50.37 6.79 7.41
10th CSU Bakersfield 0.1936 35.05 15.69 32.96 50.37 6.79 7.41
11th Grand Canyon 0.1834 33.42 15.08 31.75 50.14 6.95 6.02
12th Grand Canyon 0.1834 33.42 15.08 31.75 50.14 6.95 6.02
13th UMKC 0.1579 33.45 17.65 31.12 52.73 6.12 5.00
14th UMKC 0.1579 33.45 17.65 31.12 52.73 6.12 5.00
15th Chicago St. 0.1429 32.97 18.68 31.35 50.34 6.74 4.75
16th Chicago St. 0.1429 32.97 18.68 31.35 50.34 6.74 4.75

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st New Mexico St. 0.1463 31.87 17.24 29.70 54.67 6.50 4.22
2nd New Mexico St. 0.1463 31.87 17.24 29.70 54.67 6.50 4.22
3rd UTRGV 0.1762 33.67 16.05 31.68 50.43 5.68 5.39
4th UTRGV 0.1762 33.67 16.05 31.68 50.43 5.68 5.39
5th CSU Bakersfield 0.1883 33.77 14.93 31.79 52.98 5.42 5.11
6th CSU Bakersfield 0.1883 33.77 14.93 31.79 52.98 5.42 5.11
7th Utah Valley 0.2005 36.85 16.80 34.50 45.47 7.51 5.96
8th Utah Valley 0.2005 36.85 16.80 34.50 45.47 7.51 5.96
9th UMKC 0.2065 35.75 15.10 32.87 49.41 5.79 5.08
10th UMKC 0.2065 35.75 15.10 32.87 49.41 5.79 5.08
11th Grand Canyon 0.2232 36.44 14.12 34.10 50.58 5.25 4.84
12th Grand Canyon 0.2232 36.44 14.12 34.10 50.58 5.25 4.84
13th Seattle U 0.2300 38.09 15.09 34.45 48.10 6.93 8.09
14th Seattle U 0.2300 38.09 15.09 34.45 48.10 6.93 8.09
15th Chicago St. 0.2709 39.93 12.84 37.28 47.48 3.93 4.63
16th Chicago St. 0.2709 39.93 12.84 37.28 47.48 3.93 4.63

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,568.8931 1,567.7543 1,566.2358 1,565.8664 1,567.1874
Difference -1.1388 -2.6572 -3.0267 -2.2742

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
New Mexico St. 103 2,374 1,123 121 179 47.30 19.6 13.3 2,054 775 88 141 62.27 23.3 14.6
Seattle U 104 2,332 1,147 122 275 49.19 19.1 8.5 2,178 955 177 183 56.15 12.3 11.9
UTRGV 112 2,450 1,073 119 203 43.80 20.6 12.1 2,344 970 129 191 58.62 18.2 12.3
Utah Valley 116 2,604 1,073 114 168 41.21 22.8 15.5 2,580 1,049 155 237 59.34 16.6 10.9
Grand Canyon 100 2,146 902 130 165 42.03 16.5 13.0 2,201 968 106 192 56.02 20.8 11.5
UMKC 97 2,053 814 101 190 39.65 20.3 10.8 2,243 1,013 114 173 54.84 19.7 13.0
Chicago St. 115 2,427 955 124 178 39.35 19.6 13.6 2,651 1,203 116 221 54.62 22.9 12.0
CSU Bakersfield 119 2,455 1,044 176 219 42.53 13.9 11.2 2,772 1,404 146 223 49.35 19.0 12.4
Conference Average 108 2,355 1,016 126 197 43.13 19.1 12.2 2,378 1,042 129 195 56.40 19.1 12.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Western Athletic

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

79.11

2017-09-23 Edinburg, TX
UTRGV
New Mexico St.
3
2
25
23
20
25
20
25
25
23
15
12
GAME

77.77

2017-09-30 Bakersfield, CA
CSU Bakersfield
Utah Valley
3
2
28
26
22
25
23
25
25
16
17
15
GAME

75.66

2017-11-09 PHOENIX, Ariz.
Grand Canyon
New Mexico St.
2
3
19
25
25
18
20
25
25
23
9
15
GAME

75.30

2017-11-18 Edinburg, TX
UTRGV
CSU Bakersfield
1
3
27
25
18
25
28
30
18
25
GAME

75.26

2017-11-17 Edinburg, TX
UTRGV
Utah Valley
3
1
29
27
21
25
26
24
25
21
GAME

74.82

2017-10-12 Edinburg, TX
UTRGV
Grand Canyon
3
2
25
20
26
28
15
25
25
21
15
10
GAME

74.76

2017-10-21 Orem, Utah
Utah Valley
Seattle U
2
3
25
22
22
25
22
25
25
20
10
15
GAME

74.60

2017-10-28 Kansas City, Mo.
UMKC
UTRGV
3
2
25
22
17
25
25
20
23
25
15
13
GAME

74.45

2017-10-07 Seattle, WA
Seattle U
UTRGV
3
2
16
25
25
22
16
25
25
20
15
12
GAME

73.86

2017-10-07 Orem, Utah
Utah Valley
New Mexico St.
3
2
22
25
25
17
22
25
25
20
15
10

HuskerGeek Western Athletic All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.6610
2 21.8930
3 21.2493
4 20.3830
5 20.1494
6 19.6311
7 19.5560
8 19.1212
9 18.4678
10 17.9434

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.3963
2 14.3270
3 12.7824
4 12.1393
5 11.8872
6 11.8357
7 11.5485
8 10.4288
9 10.2665
10 9.0548

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.8130
2 16.8400
3 16.1721
4 15.0332
5 14.7133
6 14.1925
7 14.1512
8 12.4908
9 12.1945
10 10.5409

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2042
2 0.1932
3 0.1904
4 0.1892
5 0.1866
6 0.1812
7 0.1812
8 0.1759
9 0.1757
10 0.1753

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1297
2 0.1246
3 0.1229
4 0.1149
5 0.1121
6 0.1102
7 0.1061
8 0.1046
9 0.0893
10 0.0858

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1582
2 0.1570
3 0.1497
4 0.1464
5 0.1444
6 0.1296
7 0.1290
8 0.1288
9 0.1109
10 0.1087


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek