Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Pittsburgh | 1,765.1026 | 1,733.9608 | 1,749.4624 | 53.78 | 69.41 | 0.230 |
2nd | Georgia Tech | 1,727.0715 | 1,686.3498 | 1,706.5892 | 52.61 | 60.95 | 0.134 |
3rd | Louisville | 1,717.2387 | 1,686.3733 | 1,701.7360 | 50.99 | 58.51 | 0.151 |
4th | Florida St. | 1,699.3557 | 1,667.2889 | 1,683.2460 | 50.49 | 63.16 | 0.156 |
5th | Notre Dame | 1,660.6464 | 1,627.0410 | 1,643.7578 | 50.80 | 57.90 | 0.087 |
6th | North Carolina | 1,645.2170 | 1,608.5202 | 1,626.7652 | 47.19 | 60.06 | 0.059 |
7th | Syracuse | 1,639.4005 | 1,604.7685 | 1,621.9920 | 48.53 | 56.10 | 0.087 |
8th | Clemson | 1,621.5649 | 1,591.7843 | 1,606.6056 | 46.75 | 58.43 | 0.053 |
9th | Miami (FL) | 1,604.2910 | 1,570.2000 | 1,587.1539 | 49.23 | 55.10 | 0.047 |
10th | Boston College | 1,603.3245 | 1,570.8888 | 1,587.0238 | 46.29 | 58.39 | 0.029 |
11th | NC State | 1,592.6774 | 1,559.1447 | 1,575.8219 | 48.85 | 53.81 | 0.022 |
12th | Virginia | 1,582.3472 | 1,549.3005 | 1,565.7366 | 48.43 | 52.25 | 0.036 |
13th | Duke | 1,571.9529 | 1,539.1374 | 1,555.4586 | 45.53 | 52.27 | 0.025 |
14th | Wake Forest | 1,555.5959 | 1,526.2150 | 1,540.8354 | 43.80 | 55.48 | 0.020 |
15th | Virginia Tech | 1,534.3065 | 1,504.6129 | 1,519.3872 | 46.56 | 51.66 | -0.036 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Pittsburgh | 0.3215 | 45.52 | 13.37 | 42.09 | 38.96 | 6.69 | 7.37 |
2nd | Georgia Tech | 0.3119 | 44.76 | 13.57 | 41.07 | 40.53 | 5.00 | 7.05 |
3rd | Florida St. | 0.2933 | 41.02 | 11.70 | 37.84 | 48.59 | 3.99 | 6.36 |
4th | Louisville | 0.2776 | 41.81 | 14.05 | 38.56 | 43.61 | 4.99 | 7.42 |
5th | Syracuse | 0.2697 | 42.70 | 15.72 | 39.85 | 42.73 | 5.08 | 7.43 |
6th | Notre Dame | 0.2445 | 37.57 | 13.11 | 34.90 | 48.05 | 4.77 | 6.96 |
7th | Boston College | 0.2430 | 39.09 | 14.79 | 36.67 | 44.02 | 6.45 | 6.95 |
8th | Clemson | 0.2383 | 39.55 | 15.72 | 36.39 | 45.70 | 5.97 | 6.94 |
9th | North Carolina | 0.2379 | 38.64 | 14.84 | 35.46 | 47.31 | 5.24 | 6.60 |
10th | Miami (FL) | 0.2368 | 39.69 | 16.01 | 37.48 | 43.79 | 6.38 | 8.18 |
11th | Virginia | 0.2343 | 38.29 | 14.86 | 35.82 | 46.85 | 5.83 | 6.36 |
12th | Duke | 0.2334 | 37.11 | 13.77 | 33.70 | 48.56 | 5.41 | 5.83 |
13th | NC State | 0.2323 | 37.33 | 14.10 | 34.70 | 47.28 | 6.08 | 5.71 |
14th | Wake Forest | 0.2145 | 36.91 | 15.46 | 33.34 | 49.16 | 5.62 | 6.51 |
15th | Virginia Tech | 0.1872 | 33.35 | 14.63 | 31.07 | 51.41 | 4.53 | 5.87 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Pittsburgh | 0.0910 | 27.57 | 18.47 | 26.51 | 56.38 | 7.83 | 3.54 |
2nd | Louisville | 0.1265 | 31.08 | 18.43 | 29.72 | 51.28 | 8.18 | 4.19 |
3rd | Florida St. | 0.1375 | 31.38 | 17.62 | 29.93 | 52.12 | 8.26 | 6.14 |
4th | Notre Dame | 0.1579 | 30.95 | 15.16 | 29.78 | 53.10 | 6.28 | 3.74 |
5th | Georgia Tech | 0.1783 | 32.93 | 15.11 | 30.93 | 53.51 | 5.49 | 5.36 |
6th | North Carolina | 0.1793 | 34.51 | 16.58 | 32.82 | 49.45 | 8.10 | 4.18 |
7th | Syracuse | 0.1822 | 34.39 | 16.17 | 31.91 | 50.63 | 7.22 | 5.08 |
8th | Clemson | 0.1850 | 34.82 | 16.31 | 32.20 | 50.76 | 6.39 | 5.43 |
9th | Miami (FL) | 0.1900 | 35.72 | 16.72 | 33.47 | 48.01 | 6.33 | 6.89 |
10th | Wake Forest | 0.1946 | 35.15 | 15.68 | 32.49 | 48.03 | 6.20 | 6.82 |
11th | Virginia | 0.1983 | 35.52 | 15.69 | 33.18 | 48.62 | 7.16 | 6.24 |
12th | Duke | 0.2089 | 35.03 | 14.15 | 32.16 | 48.70 | 6.64 | 5.07 |
13th | NC State | 0.2101 | 34.61 | 13.60 | 31.28 | 51.40 | 6.16 | 4.95 |
14th | Boston College | 0.2136 | 36.03 | 14.67 | 33.47 | 49.61 | 6.12 | 4.80 |
15th | Virginia Tech | 0.2228 | 36.39 | 14.11 | 33.92 | 49.21 | 4.59 | 6.05 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,618.1048 | 1,615.5940 | 1,614.1180 | 1,610.9003 | 1,614.6793 |
Difference | -2.5108 | -3.9868 | -7.2045 | -4.5674 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Pittsburgh | 111 | 2,552 | 1,254 | 156 | 238 | 49.14 | 16.4 | 10.7 | 2,079 | 724 | 85 | 200 | 65.18 | 24.5 | 10.4 |
Florida St. | 100 | 2,358 | 1,179 | 117 | 142 | 50.00 | 20.2 | 16.6 | 2,031 | 830 | 131 | 239 | 59.13 | 15.5 | 8.5 |
Georgia Tech | 123 | 2,827 | 1,445 | 170 | 219 | 51.11 | 16.6 | 12.9 | 2,416 | 1,017 | 128 | 264 | 57.91 | 18.9 | 9.2 |
Louisville | 121 | 2,262 | 1,107 | 157 | 207 | 48.94 | 14.4 | 10.9 | 2,032 | 909 | 138 | 253 | 55.27 | 14.7 | 8.0 |
Boston College | 128 | 2,688 | 1,239 | 170 | 171 | 46.09 | 15.8 | 15.7 | 2,581 | 1,130 | 131 | 228 | 56.22 | 19.7 | 11.3 |
North Carolina | 107 | 2,371 | 1,060 | 133 | 211 | 44.71 | 17.8 | 11.2 | 2,339 | 1,021 | 98 | 215 | 56.35 | 23.9 | 10.9 |
Notre Dame | 118 | 2,634 | 1,253 | 148 | 271 | 47.57 | 17.8 | 9.7 | 2,567 | 1,201 | 105 | 266 | 53.21 | 24.4 | 9.7 |
Wake Forest | 105 | 2,232 | 1,027 | 132 | 227 | 46.01 | 16.9 | 9.8 | 2,259 | 1,034 | 151 | 200 | 54.23 | 15.0 | 11.3 |
Clemson | 111 | 2,415 | 1,081 | 145 | 196 | 44.76 | 16.7 | 12.3 | 2,427 | 1,093 | 134 | 242 | 54.97 | 18.1 | 10.0 |
Syracuse | 94 | 2,037 | 921 | 124 | 247 | 45.21 | 16.4 | 8.2 | 2,037 | 960 | 106 | 168 | 52.87 | 19.2 | 12.1 |
Virginia | 107 | 2,310 | 1,088 | 132 | 223 | 47.10 | 17.5 | 10.4 | 2,346 | 1,160 | 140 | 197 | 50.55 | 16.8 | 11.9 |
Miami (FL) | 102 | 2,165 | 1,005 | 148 | 236 | 46.42 | 14.6 | 9.2 | 2,284 | 1,117 | 157 | 184 | 51.10 | 14.5 | 12.4 |
NC State | 123 | 2,432 | 1,131 | 126 | 217 | 46.51 | 19.3 | 11.2 | 2,580 | 1,273 | 130 | 240 | 50.66 | 19.8 | 10.8 |
Virginia Tech | 125 | 2,461 | 1,135 | 125 | 213 | 46.12 | 19.7 | 11.6 | 2,694 | 1,365 | 159 | 250 | 49.33 | 16.9 | 10.8 |
Duke | 110 | 2,188 | 965 | 105 | 220 | 44.10 | 20.8 | 9.9 | 2,444 | 1,248 | 143 | 213 | 48.94 | 17.1 | 11.5 |
Conference Average | 112 | 2,395 | 1,126 | 139 | 216 | 46.92 | 17.4 | 11.4 | 2,341 | 1,072 | 129 | 224 | 54.39 | 18.6 | 10.6 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
80.56 |
2019-11-08 | Pittsburgh, Pa. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
80.24 |
2019-11-22 | Pittsburgh, Pa. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
78.88 |
2019-09-29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
78.15 |
2019-10-13 | Chapel Hill, N.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
77.63 |
2019-09-27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
77.54 |
2019-11-17 | Tallahassee, Fla. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
77.50 |
2019-11-01 | Chapel Hill, N.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.95 |
2019-10-18 | Clemson, S.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.54 |
2019-11-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.35 |
2019-09-29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Payton Caffrey | Florida St. | A |
Kayla Lund | Pittsburgh | A |
Chinaza Ndee | Pittsburgh | A |
Sabrina Starks | Pittsburgh | A |
Stephanie Williams | Pittsburgh | A |
Hali Hillegas | Pittsburgh | D |
Zoe Nunez | Notre Dame | S |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Kayla Lund | Pittsburgh |
2 | Payton Caffrey | Florida St. |
3 | Zoe Nunez | Notre Dame |
4 | Stephanie Williams | Pittsburgh |
5 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Kayla Lund | Pittsburgh |
2 | Payton Caffrey | Florida St. |
3 | Stephanie Williams | Pittsburgh |
4 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech |
5 | Polina Shemanova | Syracuse |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Zoe Nunez | Notre Dame |
2 | Lexis Akeo | Pittsburgh |
3 | Matti McKissock | Georgia Tech |
4 | McKenna Slavik | Clemson |
5 | Elena Karakasi | Syracuse |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Hali Hillegas | Pittsburgh |
2 | Mia Fradenburg | North Carolina |
3 | Alexis Hamilton | Louisville |
4 | Madison Cruzado | Notre Dame |
5 | Maddie Tippett | Georgia Tech |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Zoe Nunez | Notre Dame | 26.0910 |
2 | Charley Niego | Notre Dame | 23.9318 |
3 | Polina Shemanova | Syracuse | 21.8437 |
4 | Julia Bergmann | Georgia Tech | 21.5921 |
5 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech | 20.7481 |
6 | Kayla Lund | Pittsburgh | 20.5579 |
7 | Payton Caffrey | Florida St. | 20.1316 |
8 | Matti McKissock | Georgia Tech | 19.6969 |
9 | Nina Sharpton | NC State | 19.6500 |
10 | Jade Parchment | NC State | 19.3576 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Zoe Nunez | Notre Dame | 16.0876 |
2 | Matti McKissock | Georgia Tech | 13.4850 |
3 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech | 12.9347 |
4 | Polina Shemanova | Syracuse | 12.4117 |
5 | Lexis Akeo | Pittsburgh | 12.3310 |
6 | McKenna Slavik | Clemson | 12.0522 |
7 | Payton Caffrey | Florida St. | 11.9367 |
8 | Savannah Vach | Miami (FL) | 11.9318 |
9 | Nina Sharpton | NC State | 11.7313 |
10 | Charley Niego | Notre Dame | 11.7298 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Logan Mosley | Virginia Tech | 16.3437 |
2 | Madison Cruzado | Notre Dame | 15.4494 |
3 | Kaylee Frazier | NC State | 14.3731 |
4 | Mackenzie Cole | Duke | 13.4623 |
5 | Hali Hillegas | Pittsburgh | 12.7485 |
6 | Charley Niego | Notre Dame | 12.2019 |
7 | Alexis Hamilton | Louisville | 12.1236 |
8 | Mia Fradenburg | North Carolina | 11.8184 |
9 | Caitlin Clarke | Wake Forest | 11.7543 |
10 | Maddie Tippett | Georgia Tech | 11.5797 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Polina Shemanova | Syracuse | 0.2324 |
2 | Zoe Nunez | Notre Dame | 0.2269 |
3 | Payton Caffrey | Florida St. | 0.2188 |
4 | Charley Niego | Notre Dame | 0.2081 |
5 | Kayla Lund | Pittsburgh | 0.1958 |
6 | Morgan Chacon | Florida St. | 0.1922 |
7 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech | 0.1903 |
8 | Julia Bergmann | Georgia Tech | 0.1755 |
9 | McKenna Slavik | Clemson | 0.1743 |
10 | Jewel Strawberry | Boston College | 0.1688 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Zoe Nunez | Notre Dame | 0.1399 |
2 | Polina Shemanova | Syracuse | 0.1320 |
3 | Payton Caffrey | Florida St. | 0.1297 |
4 | Savannah Vach | Miami (FL) | 0.1218 |
5 | Mariana Brambilla | Georgia Tech | 0.1187 |
6 | Lexis Akeo | Pittsburgh | 0.1163 |
7 | Lauren Harrison | North Carolina | 0.1130 |
8 | Kayla Lund | Pittsburgh | 0.1114 |
9 | Matti McKissock | Georgia Tech | 0.1096 |
10 | McKenna Slavik | Clemson | 0.1096 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kaylee Frazier | NC State | 0.1423 |
2 | Kelsey Miller | Virginia | 0.1404 |
3 | Aliah Bowllan | Syracuse | 0.1344 |
4 | Madison Cruzado | Notre Dame | 0.1343 |
5 | Logan Mosley | Virginia Tech | 0.1329 |
6 | Mackenzie Cole | Duke | 0.1307 |
7 | Mia Fradenburg | North Carolina | 0.1285 |
8 | Alexis Hamilton | Louisville | 0.1263 |
9 | Hali Hillegas | Pittsburgh | 0.1203 |
10 | Amanda Falck | Miami (FL) | 0.1165 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.