Nerdly Nebraska.

2018-2019 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,750.6919
BPR D1 NCAAWBB Baylor 0.7877

Football clemson 12.6021
Men's Basketball duke 12.9757
Women's Basketball baylor 13.5441
Baseball vanderbilt 10.1036
Softball oklahoma 13.3516
Ice Hockey st cloud st 10.4909
Men's Lacrosse penn st 7.8422
Women's Lacrosse maryland 11.2186
Men's Soccer palm beach atl 10.6001
Women's Soccer usc 12.7949
Men's Volleyball hawaii 9.4513
Women's Volleyball stanford 12.9947
Field Hockey north carolina 12.5324

ASC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Texas-Dallas 1,555.4928 1,564.5941 1,560.0368 59.08 69.85 0.257
2nd Mary Hardin-Baylor 1,525.9765 1,538.5104 1,532.2306 58.62 68.08 0.256
3rd Texas-Tyler 1,521.2167 1,531.5441 1,526.3716 56.96 69.18 0.248
4th Concordia (TX) 1,448.8669 1,452.9343 1,450.8992 54.14 62.96 0.162
5th McMurry 1,438.1994 1,451.3996 1,444.7845 52.47 66.17 0.190
6th East Tex. Baptist 1,411.6006 1,433.0426 1,422.2812 54.13 60.73 0.150
7th Hardin-Simmons 1,401.3018 1,417.3396 1,409.2979 55.57 58.00 0.116
8th LeTourneau 1,285.1162 1,304.0585 1,294.5527 47.57 55.27 0.040
9th Belhaven 1,278.7941 1,300.7934 1,289.7468 45.55 55.97 0.035
10th Sul Ross St. 1,250.7225 1,281.9876 1,266.2585 46.23 53.93 -0.008
11th Howard Payne 1,249.6118 1,267.0228 1,258.2872 46.13 52.24 -0.006
12th Louisiana Col. 1,213.5391 1,248.4781 1,230.8846 44.40 52.22 -0.034

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Mary Hardin-Baylor 0.3268 43.47 10.79 40.23 46.34 3.76 9.16
2nd Texas-Tyler 0.3169 44.05 12.35 41.46 43.14 2.93 8.89
3rd Texas-Dallas 0.2958 40.05 10.47 37.32 47.75 1.93 9.39
4th McMurry 0.2602 39.05 13.02 35.65 49.61 3.19 7.15
5th Concordia (TX) 0.2495 38.85 13.90 36.24 49.13 3.37 9.13
6th East Tex. Baptist 0.2466 37.19 12.53 34.11 50.68 2.30 7.20
7th Hardin-Simmons 0.2095 37.33 16.39 34.50 49.05 3.55 11.13
8th Belhaven 0.2053 32.98 12.45 30.55 50.44 4.26 7.20
9th Howard Payne 0.1680 33.43 16.63 30.93 54.27 4.41 7.91
10th LeTourneau 0.1542 32.30 16.87 29.95 55.02 4.26 7.84
11th Louisiana Col. 0.1537 32.29 16.93 29.51 54.22 3.42 7.97
12th Sul Ross St. 0.1402 31.45 17.43 29.24 58.00 4.48 6.13

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Texas-Dallas 0.0389 22.28 18.39 20.98 63.90 6.20 4.13
2nd Texas-Tyler 0.0687 25.28 18.41 23.64 60.93 5.97 6.10
3rd McMurry 0.0700 25.10 18.10 23.83 59.83 6.31 5.26
4th Mary Hardin-Baylor 0.0706 24.42 17.36 23.05 61.83 7.09 6.47
5th Concordia (TX) 0.0877 25.84 17.07 23.88 61.16 5.61 7.35
6th Hardin-Simmons 0.0937 27.18 17.80 25.17 59.69 4.74 6.52
7th East Tex. Baptist 0.0966 25.46 15.80 24.14 61.30 4.37 6.38
8th LeTourneau 0.1139 28.69 17.30 27.20 56.91 5.15 6.71
9th Sul Ross St. 0.1485 32.07 17.23 30.35 55.65 3.19 7.91
10th Belhaven 0.1699 32.10 15.11 29.68 50.00 4.07 8.68
11th Howard Payne 0.1745 34.16 16.72 31.96 51.80 5.96 10.21
12th Louisiana Col. 0.1881 31.87 13.05 29.65 56.50 3.57 8.15

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,390.4693 1,389.4710 1,388.0240 1,385.2604 1,388.3062
Difference -0.9983 -2.4453 -5.2089 -2.8842

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Texas-Tyler 96 2,239 1,144 154 159 51.09 14.5 14.1 1,810 690 116 160 61.88 15.6 11.3
Texas-Dallas 115 2,689 1,360 201 151 50.58 13.4 17.8 2,234 880 108 167 60.61 20.7 13.4
McMurry 104 2,242 1,078 141 139 48.08 15.9 16.1 1,955 776 108 145 60.31 18.1 13.5
Mary Hardin-Baylor 119 1,970 973 182 116 49.39 10.8 17.0 1,731 713 155 160 58.81 11.2 10.8
Concordia (TX) 109 2,374 1,168 184 189 49.20 12.9 12.6 2,142 923 166 154 56.91 12.9 13.9
East Tex. Baptist 96 2,088 1,024 117 104 49.04 17.8 20.1 1,949 886 128 128 54.54 15.2 15.2
Hardin-Simmons 95 1,887 957 194 163 50.72 9.7 11.6 1,768 840 130 143 52.49 13.6 12.4
Belhaven 85 1,661 700 101 167 42.14 16.4 9.9 1,880 931 168 144 50.48 11.2 13.1
LeTourneau 91 1,815 768 118 163 42.31 15.4 11.1 2,084 1,055 140 140 49.38 14.9 14.9
Sul Ross St. 68 1,245 517 61 102 41.53 20.4 12.2 1,492 775 123 131 48.06 12.1 11.4
Howard Payne 80 1,430 600 96 127 41.96 14.9 11.3 1,762 945 184 137 46.37 9.6 12.9
Louisiana Col. 89 1,567 623 113 193 39.76 13.9 8.1 1,981 1,057 176 151 46.64 11.3 13.1
Conference Average 96 1,934 909 139 148 46.32 14.7 13.5 1,899 873 142 147 53.87 13.9 13.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the ASC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.05

2018-09-21 Belton, TX
Mary Hardin-Baylor
Texas-Dallas
3
2
20
25
25
23
21
25
25
22
15
11
GAME

74.96

2018-10-27 Austin, Texas
Concordia (TX)
McMurry
2
3
23
25
15
25
34
32
25
20
15
17
GAME

74.73

2018-11-03 Belton, Texas
Mary Hardin-Baylor
Texas-Dallas
3
2
25
17
18
25
25
20
22
25
15
13
GAME

74.40

2018-11-02 Belton, Texas
Mary Hardin-Baylor
Texas-Dallas
3
1
26
24
19
25
25
23
25
21
GAME

74.12

2018-10-12 Tyler, Texas
Texas-Tyler
Mary Hardin-Baylor
3
1
25
20
26
24
24
26
25
23
GAME

69.85

2018-10-23 Richardson, Texas
Texas-Dallas
Texas-Tyler
3
0
25
16
25
20
25
21
GAME

69.60

2018-09-25 Tyler, Texas
Texas-Tyler
Texas-Dallas
3
1
25
21
25
17
20
25
25
18
GAME

68.56

2018-10-13 Tyler, Texas
East Tex. Baptist
Mary Hardin-Baylor
0
3
18
25
22
25
23
25
GAME

68.46

2018-11-02 Belton, Texas
Mary Hardin-Baylor
McMurry
3
1
25
16
25
17
22
25
25
22
GAME

67.95

2018-10-02 Abilene, Texas
Hardin-Simmons
Mary Hardin-Baylor
1
3
25
22
23
25
17
25
13
25

HuskerGeek ASC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 18.8410
2 18.8017
3 17.9506
4 17.4316
5 16.7875
6 16.6823
7 16.5712
8 15.8226
9 15.3168
10 15.0600

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.7646
2 10.7467
3 9.8505
4 9.3596
5 9.2493
6 9.0890
7 8.4167
8 8.1289
9 8.0702
10 7.9531

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 14.0355
2 13.6552
3 12.4143
4 11.7595
5 11.1784
6 9.9449
7 9.5798
8 9.4814
9 9.4785
10 9.0663

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2212
2 0.2191
3 0.1940
4 0.1851
5 0.1823
6 0.1821
7 0.1802
8 0.1709
9 0.1662
10 0.1649

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1250
2 0.1200
3 0.1159
4 0.1088
5 0.1088
6 0.1011
7 0.0995
8 0.0964
9 0.0945
10 0.0937

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1461
2 0.1432
3 0.1397
4 0.1334
5 0.1313
6 0.1193
7 0.1188
8 0.1182
9 0.1164
10 0.1156


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek