Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Amherst | 1,425.6411 | 1,468.8472 | 1,447.0829 | 57.28 | 64.38 | 0.208 |
2nd | Bowdoin | 1,422.8641 | 1,458.8672 | 1,440.7532 | 56.47 | 65.00 | 0.207 |
3rd | Williams | 1,398.5653 | 1,418.4741 | 1,408.4845 | 54.00 | 63.56 | 0.170 |
4th | Tufts | 1,388.8265 | 1,399.3450 | 1,394.0758 | 55.78 | 61.66 | 0.172 |
5th | Middlebury | 1,354.6317 | 1,382.2671 | 1,368.3796 | 52.30 | 61.74 | 0.143 |
6th | Connecticut Col. | 1,308.3390 | 1,342.1640 | 1,325.1436 | 48.06 | 58.47 | 0.110 |
7th | Colby | 1,257.9226 | 1,296.2009 | 1,276.9183 | 50.61 | 53.72 | 0.063 |
8th | Bates | 1,237.1690 | 1,279.5369 | 1,258.1746 | 47.82 | 53.69 | -0.016 |
9th | Trinity (CT) | 1,213.4234 | 1,259.2134 | 1,236.1064 | 45.16 | 52.02 | -0.006 |
10th | Wesleyan (CT) | 1,201.0947 | 1,232.8297 | 1,216.8588 | 46.18 | 51.96 | -0.007 |
11th | Hamilton | 1,182.9112 | 1,227.0669 | 1,204.7868 | 47.26 | 50.56 | -0.029 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Amherst | 0.2745 | 38.07 | 10.61 | 35.41 | 51.63 | 3.07 | 8.03 |
2nd | Bowdoin | 0.2689 | 38.63 | 11.74 | 35.87 | 50.90 | 3.37 | 10.19 |
3rd | Williams | 0.2590 | 40.42 | 14.52 | 37.85 | 46.84 | 4.26 | 9.38 |
4th | Middlebury | 0.2583 | 38.15 | 12.31 | 34.80 | 49.82 | 4.35 | 9.30 |
5th | Tufts | 0.2431 | 37.90 | 13.59 | 34.86 | 51.58 | 3.18 | 9.44 |
6th | Connecticut Col. | 0.2152 | 35.30 | 13.77 | 32.75 | 54.79 | 3.70 | 7.26 |
7th | Trinity (CT) | 0.1814 | 32.02 | 13.88 | 28.55 | 57.32 | 4.68 | 13.88 |
8th | Colby | 0.1717 | 31.88 | 14.71 | 28.53 | 56.76 | 4.60 | 9.50 |
9th | Hamilton | 0.1666 | 31.97 | 15.31 | 29.08 | 58.59 | 4.42 | 10.28 |
10th | Wesleyan (CT) | 0.1653 | 31.56 | 15.03 | 29.80 | 57.44 | 4.63 | 7.68 |
11th | Bates | 0.1532 | 32.21 | 16.89 | 30.35 | 54.22 | 4.38 | 9.65 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Bowdoin | 0.0616 | 23.47 | 17.31 | 22.25 | 64.79 | 5.13 | 4.84 |
2nd | Amherst | 0.0663 | 24.29 | 17.65 | 23.20 | 60.39 | 4.85 | 6.64 |
3rd | Tufts | 0.0707 | 25.41 | 18.33 | 23.51 | 59.09 | 6.35 | 6.62 |
4th | Williams | 0.0893 | 26.34 | 17.41 | 24.16 | 62.11 | 4.05 | 6.15 |
5th | Connecticut Col. | 0.1050 | 27.51 | 17.01 | 25.06 | 57.51 | 4.52 | 7.66 |
6th | Colby | 0.1090 | 29.01 | 18.11 | 26.68 | 58.24 | 5.96 | 7.13 |
7th | Middlebury | 0.1151 | 28.97 | 17.47 | 26.74 | 56.66 | 5.62 | 6.49 |
8th | Bates | 0.1693 | 32.18 | 15.25 | 29.80 | 54.79 | 4.01 | 8.05 |
9th | Wesleyan (CT) | 0.1721 | 33.89 | 16.68 | 32.07 | 50.47 | 4.87 | 10.17 |
10th | Trinity (CT) | 0.1876 | 32.78 | 14.02 | 29.16 | 54.19 | 3.06 | 8.09 |
11th | Hamilton | 0.1954 | 34.20 | 14.66 | 31.01 | 53.36 | 4.69 | 13.75 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,325.1604 | 1,324.9883 | 1,323.8976 | 1,324.5384 | 1,324.6462 |
Difference | -0.1721 | -1.2629 | -0.6220 | -0.6857 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Amherst | 100 | 2,029 | 1,087 | 168 | 117 | 53.57 | 12.1 | 17.3 | 1,614 | 657 | 135 | 171 | 59.29 | 12.0 | 9.4 |
Bowdoin | 109 | 2,265 | 1,178 | 231 | 264 | 52.01 | 9.8 | 8.6 | 1,863 | 759 | 129 | 178 | 59.26 | 14.4 | 10.5 |
Williams | 112 | 2,294 | 1,098 | 191 | 199 | 47.86 | 12.0 | 11.5 | 2,112 | 911 | 166 | 200 | 56.87 | 12.7 | 10.6 |
Tufts | 89 | 1,759 | 871 | 176 | 165 | 49.52 | 10.0 | 10.7 | 1,614 | 726 | 143 | 169 | 55.02 | 11.3 | 9.6 |
Middlebury | 94 | 1,545 | 724 | 180 | 165 | 46.86 | 8.6 | 9.4 | 1,468 | 647 | 144 | 153 | 55.93 | 10.2 | 9.6 |
Hamilton | 91 | 459 | 232 | 161 | 142 | 50.55 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 446 | 216 | 194 | 160 | 51.57 | 2.3 | 2.8 |
Connecticut Col. | 83 | 862 | 393 | 143 | 201 | 45.59 | 6.0 | 4.3 | 904 | 423 | 142 | 135 | 53.21 | 6.4 | 6.7 |
Colby | 98 | 1,113 | 536 | 187 | 227 | 48.16 | 6.0 | 4.9 | 1,181 | 603 | 184 | 185 | 48.94 | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Wesleyan (CT) | 71 | 1,281 | 599 | 111 | 99 | 46.76 | 11.5 | 12.9 | 1,354 | 680 | 176 | 128 | 49.78 | 7.7 | 10.6 |
Bates | 90 | 1,612 | 760 | 188 | 139 | 47.15 | 8.6 | 11.6 | 1,711 | 867 | 166 | 187 | 49.33 | 10.3 | 9.1 |
Trinity (CT) | 79 | 546 | 249 | 196 | 198 | 45.60 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 597 | 304 | 148 | 134 | 49.08 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Conference Average | 92 | 1,433 | 702 | 176 | 174 | 48.51 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 1,351 | 618 | 157 | 164 | 53.48 | 8.9 | 8.2 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
72.85 |
2015-11-07 | Brunswick, Maine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
69.53 |
2015-10-16 | Amherst, Mass. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
68.67 |
2015-11-08 | Brunswick, Maine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
68.20 |
2015-09-19 | Amherst, Mass. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
67.62 |
2015-10-09 | Middlebury, Vt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
65.27 |
2015-10-10 | Middlebury, Vt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
65.04 |
2015-10-17 | Williamstown, MA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
64.84 |
2015-10-31 | Middlebury, Vt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
64.53 |
2015-11-07 | Brunswick, Maine |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
64.09 |
2015-09-23 | Williamstown, MA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Christy Jewett | Bowdoin | A |
Maddie Kuppe | Tufts | A |
Sydney Salle | Bowdoin | A |
Erika Sklaver | Bowdoin | A |
Katie Doherty | Bowdoin | D |
Tori Jasuta | Williams | D |
Quincy Leech | Bowdoin | S |
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Maggie Danner | Amherst | A |
Mckenzie Humann | Tufts | A |
Becca Raffel | Middlebury | A |
Eliana Schaefer | Middlebury | A |
Ally Ostrow | Williams | D |
Katie Warshaw | Amherst | D |
Ryan Farley | Williams | S |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Maddie Kuppe | Tufts |
2 | Quincy Leech | Bowdoin |
3 | Katie Doherty | Bowdoin |
4 | Tori Jasuta | Williams |
5 | Ally Ostrow | Williams |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Maddie Kuppe | Tufts |
2 | Christy Jewett | Bowdoin |
3 | Becca Raffel | Middlebury |
4 | Maggie Danner | Amherst |
5 | Erika Sklaver | Bowdoin |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Quincy Leech | Bowdoin |
2 | Ryan Farley | Williams |
3 | Hannah Blackburn | Middlebury |
4 | Nicole Carter | Amherst |
5 | Katia Elisman | Connecticut Col. |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Katie Doherty | Bowdoin |
2 | Tori Jasuta | Williams |
3 | Katie Warshaw | Amherst |
4 | Caitie Benell | Williams |
5 | Carolina Berger | Tufts |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Quincy Leech | Bowdoin | 20.3507 |
2 | Tori Jasuta | Williams | 19.4756 |
3 | Ally Ostrow | Williams | 18.5216 |
4 | Ryan Farley | Williams | 18.4621 |
5 | Katie Doherty | Bowdoin | 17.9271 |
6 | Christy Jewett | Bowdoin | 17.7312 |
7 | Maddie Kuppe | Tufts | 17.0545 |
8 | Hannah Blackburn | Middlebury | 15.4816 |
9 | Becca Raffel | Middlebury | 15.1586 |
10 | Katie Warshaw | Amherst | 13.9509 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ryan Farley | Williams | 13.1328 |
2 | Quincy Leech | Bowdoin | 12.5750 |
3 | Hannah Blackburn | Middlebury | 9.7126 |
4 | Becca Raffel | Middlebury | 9.6668 |
5 | Maddie Kuppe | Tufts | 9.6390 |
6 | Christy Jewett | Bowdoin | 8.9830 |
7 | Maggie Danner | Amherst | 8.7967 |
8 | Nicole Carter | Amherst | 8.2385 |
9 | Erika Sklaver | Bowdoin | 7.8409 |
10 | Ally Ostrow | Williams | 7.7074 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Katie Doherty | Bowdoin | 15.9679 |
2 | Katie Warshaw | Amherst | 13.0047 |
3 | Tori Jasuta | Williams | 12.9422 |
4 | Caitie Benell | Williams | 10.9508 |
5 | Ally Ostrow | Williams | 10.8142 |
6 | Laryssa Schepel | Bates | 8.7707 |
7 | Christy Jewett | Bowdoin | 8.7482 |
8 | Rachel Savage | Wesleyan (CT) | 8.5909 |
9 | Emily Kolodka | Middlebury | 8.0983 |
10 | Quincy Leech | Bowdoin | 7.7757 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Maddie Kuppe | Tufts | 0.2244 |
2 | Hannah Blackburn | Middlebury | 0.2244 |
3 | Becca Raffel | Middlebury | 0.2197 |
4 | Quincy Leech | Bowdoin | 0.2120 |
5 | Katie Doherty | Bowdoin | 0.1949 |
6 | Tori Jasuta | Williams | 0.1909 |
7 | Ally Ostrow | Williams | 0.1890 |
8 | Christy Jewett | Bowdoin | 0.1809 |
9 | Ryan Farley | Williams | 0.1792 |
10 | Sam Hunter | Connecticut Col. | 0.1635 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hannah Blackburn | Middlebury | 0.1408 |
2 | Becca Raffel | Middlebury | 0.1401 |
3 | Quincy Leech | Bowdoin | 0.1310 |
4 | Ryan Farley | Williams | 0.1275 |
5 | Maddie Kuppe | Tufts | 0.1268 |
6 | Maggie Danner | Amherst | 0.1047 |
7 | Nicole Carter | Amherst | 0.0936 |
8 | Christy Jewett | Bowdoin | 0.0917 |
9 | Sam Hunter | Connecticut Col. | 0.0848 |
10 | Erika Sklaver | Bowdoin | 0.0834 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Katie Doherty | Bowdoin | 0.1736 |
2 | Katie Warshaw | Amherst | 0.1478 |
3 | Rachel Savage | Wesleyan (CT) | 0.1386 |
4 | Tori Jasuta | Williams | 0.1269 |
5 | Emily Kolodka | Middlebury | 0.1191 |
6 | Caitie Benell | Williams | 0.1165 |
7 | Laryssa Schepel | Bates | 0.1124 |
8 | Ally Ostrow | Williams | 0.1103 |
9 | Carolina Berger | Tufts | 0.1050 |
10 | Natalie Roy | Colby | 0.1046 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.