Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

WCC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st San Diego 1,750.1808 1,719.5428 1,734.7942 53.12 66.02 0.205
2nd BYU 1,737.3167 1,705.6151 1,721.3930 56.51 63.57 0.199
3rd Pepperdine 1,694.8269 1,659.6375 1,677.1399 48.80 66.57 0.113
4th Santa Clara 1,632.4747 1,602.3132 1,617.3236 49.44 58.36 0.098
5th LMU (CA) 1,630.0321 1,603.3607 1,616.6414 47.17 58.76 0.064
6th Saint Mary's (CA) 1,611.9379 1,581.2807 1,596.5357 47.89 57.13 0.059
7th Pacific 1,578.0149 1,550.4022 1,564.1476 46.87 56.74 0.011
8th San Francisco 1,563.0831 1,529.3139 1,546.1063 46.86 53.70 0.003
9th Gonzaga 1,560.2317 1,528.2353 1,544.1507 49.64 52.40 -0.004
10th Portland 1,546.6232 1,522.5426 1,534.5357 45.26 56.70 -0.018

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st San Diego 0.3422 46.44 12.21 43.07 37.13 5.87 7.39
2nd BYU 0.3169 44.09 12.40 40.19 41.97 5.67 8.10
3rd Pepperdine 0.2872 41.89 13.17 38.75 43.14 5.48 8.53
4th LMU (CA) 0.2600 40.83 14.83 38.14 41.00 6.25 7.69
5th Santa Clara 0.2502 37.99 12.97 34.88 48.06 4.26 7.97
6th Saint Mary's (CA) 0.2300 36.82 13.82 33.76 47.28 8.08 8.74
7th Gonzaga 0.2141 35.48 14.08 32.18 49.61 5.58 9.02
8th Pacific 0.2110 36.95 15.85 34.03 44.47 7.22 7.64
9th San Francisco 0.2027 34.43 14.16 32.24 49.27 6.67 6.75
10th Portland 0.1892 35.12 16.20 32.90 47.57 7.10 8.64

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st BYU 0.1178 31.08 19.30 29.22 51.33 7.81 4.71
2nd San Diego 0.1374 29.62 15.88 27.28 55.40 6.72 4.74
3rd Santa Clara 0.1518 32.05 16.87 29.96 52.58 7.02 5.34
4th Saint Mary's (CA) 0.1710 34.29 17.19 31.57 49.29 7.05 4.86
5th Pepperdine 0.1739 32.47 15.09 30.82 53.83 6.53 3.74
6th LMU (CA) 0.1963 34.64 15.01 31.77 50.34 5.82 5.42
7th San Francisco 0.1998 34.20 14.22 32.06 52.62 5.17 4.94
8th Pacific 0.2005 32.90 12.85 30.02 54.81 3.95 4.83
9th Portland 0.2069 34.63 13.94 32.50 53.01 5.10 5.82
10th Gonzaga 0.2182 36.22 14.40 33.60 50.63 4.96 6.23

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,615.2768 1,610.4298 1,602.9824 1,598.6621 1,606.8378
Difference -4.8470 -12.2944 -16.6147 -11.2520

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
San Diego 112 2,407 1,260 149 220 52.35 16.2 10.9 1,950 756 128 245 61.23 15.2 8.0
Pepperdine 114 2,474 1,239 192 274 50.08 12.9 9.0 2,054 778 110 231 62.12 18.7 8.9
BYU 112 2,442 1,268 173 214 51.93 14.1 11.4 2,090 858 115 241 58.95 18.2 8.7
Santa Clara 124 2,861 1,437 194 334 50.23 14.7 8.6 2,601 1,165 158 244 55.21 16.5 10.7
Portland 107 2,332 1,115 178 240 47.81 13.1 9.7 2,302 1,081 152 230 53.04 15.1 10.0
Pacific 128 2,542 1,168 194 303 45.95 13.1 8.4 2,586 1,192 156 257 53.91 16.6 10.1
LMU (CA) 115 2,336 1,020 164 246 43.66 14.2 9.5 2,288 1,042 159 257 54.46 14.4 8.9
Gonzaga 110 2,268 1,082 175 232 47.71 13.0 9.8 2,410 1,230 169 207 48.96 14.3 11.6
San Francisco 108 2,273 1,029 129 235 45.27 17.6 9.7 2,447 1,211 145 205 50.51 16.9 11.9
Saint Mary's (CA) 106 1,852 844 141 205 45.57 13.1 9.0 2,634 1,710 164 194 35.08 16.1 13.6
Conference Average 114 2,379 1,146 169 250 48.06 14.2 9.6 2,336 1,102 146 231 53.35 16.2 10.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the WCC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

82.98

2019-10-01 San Diego, CA
San Diego
Pepperdine
3
2
21
25
25
19
26
24
25
27
15
13
GAME

80.27

2019-10-11
LMU (CA)
Pepperdine
1
3
23
25
28
26
22
25
23
25
GAME

78.10

2019-11-16
LMU (CA)
Saint Mary's (CA)
3
1
21
25
25
20
26
24
25
23
GAME

76.40

2019-11-15 San Diego, CA
San Diego
BYU
3
2
18
25
25
23
24
26
25
16
15
9
GAME

76.00

2019-11-07 Santa Clara, Calif.
Santa Clara
BYU
1
3
22
25
25
20
23
25
18
25
GAME

75.90

2019-10-24 Malibu, Calif.
Pepperdine
San Diego
3
0
25
19
27
25
25
22
GAME

75.37

2019-11-09 Santa Clara, Calif.
Santa Clara
San Diego
0
3
17
25
21
25
25
27
GAME

75.27

2019-10-12
Gonzaga
Pacific
1
3
27
25
27
29
22
25
20
25
GAME

75.25

2019-10-31
Gonzaga
Pepperdine
2
3
14
25
25
22
27
25
22
25
6
15
GAME

75.12

2019-10-05
Saint Mary's (CA)
BYU
0
3
12
25
22
25
27
29

HuskerGeek WCC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.7968
2 20.5873
3 20.3529
4 20.1420
5 19.8234
6 19.4024
7 18.9654
8 18.7322
9 18.3992
10 17.1107

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.0195
2 12.5336
3 12.4988
4 12.0219
5 11.8152
6 11.3610
7 10.6341
8 10.2952
9 9.8717
10 9.7293

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.4964
2 14.7275
3 14.5142
4 14.1604
5 10.8987
6 10.7615
7 10.6644
8 10.4184
9 10.2980
10 10.2921

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2101
2 0.1902
3 0.1900
4 0.1892
5 0.1841
6 0.1819
7 0.1797
8 0.1736
9 0.1724
10 0.1720

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1323
2 0.1214
3 0.1150
4 0.1135
5 0.1104
6 0.1052
7 0.1051
8 0.1042
9 0.1019
10 0.0958

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1505
2 0.1364
3 0.1311
4 0.1200
5 0.1050
6 0.1028
7 0.0997
8 0.0995
9 0.0986
10 0.0978


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek